Am. J. Bot. UCP ad
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kalisz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kalisz, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kalisz, S.
(American Journal of Botany. 2002;89:1021-1023.)
© 2002 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Brief Communications

A method to estimate pollen viability from pollen size variation1

John K. Kelly4, Aaron Rasch5 and Susan Kalisz

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1200 Sunnyside Ave., Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 USA

The mean diameter of viable pollen grains is approximately 13 µm greater than the mean diameter of inviable grains in Mimulus guttatus. We show that this difference is large enough to be detected by particle counters and that these machines can be used to obtain a rapid estimate of pollen viability. While requiring a separate calibration, a size-based statistic is also strongly correlated with pollen viability in Collinsia verna. These results suggest that statistics derived from the size distribution of pollen grains may provide an alternative to more labor-intensive methods for estimating pollen viability, particularly in cases where inviability results from inbreeding depression or hybrid failure.

Key Words: Collinsia • inbreeding • Mimulus • particle counters • pollen viability




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. GOODWILLIE and M. C. KNIGHT
Inbreeding Depression and Mixed Mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: A Comparison of Three Populations
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2006; 98(2): 351 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. K. Kelly
Epistasis in Monkeyflowers
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1917 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. N. Hayes, J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson
A comparison of male and female responses to inbreeding in Cucurbita pepo subsp. texana (Cucurbitaceae)
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. L. Parachnowitsch and E. Elle
Variation in sex allocation and male-female trade-offs in six populations of Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae s.l.)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2004; 91(8): 1200 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. K. Kelly
Deleterious Mutations and the Genetic Variance of Male Fitness Components in Mimulus guttatus
Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1071 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.