|
|
||||||||
Systematics |
Centro de Conservación y Mejora de la Agrodiversidad Valenciana, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Endemic Galápagos tomatoes (Lycopersicon cheesmanii) are of great value for cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) breeding, and therefore their conservation is of significance. Although within L. cheesmanii there is heterogeneity for many traits and formal infraspecific classification is not justified, here we distinguish three forms, without taxonomic significance, of L. cheesmanii that are of interest to breeders because of their distinctive morphology and habitat preferences: L. cheesmanii short (one- to two-pinnate leaves, short internodes, and coastal habitats), L. cheesmanii long (one- to two-pinnate leaves, long internodes, and inland habitats), and L. cheesmanii forma minor (three- to four-pinnate leaves, short internodes, and coastal habitats). In a recent survey of tomato populations in the Galápagos Islands, we found that several populations of L. cheesmanii reported 3050 years earlier had disappeared, mostly as a consequence of human activity. In addition, a previously unreported invasive wild red-fruited form, which we named L. esculentum Gal cer, was found on the island of Santa Cruz. The total diversity (estimated with amplified fragment length polymorphisms [AFLPs]) within L. cheesmanii (HT = 0.051) is almost as high as that for the mainland wild species L. pimpinellifolium (HT = 0.072). Lycopersicon esculentum Gal cer, on the other hand, has a much lower diversity (HT = 0.014). Comparison of AFLP fragments shared by L. esculentum Gal cer with other species showed that it is closely related to weedy tomato L. esculentum var. cerasiforme and, therefore, likely of recent origin. Genetic differentiation among the three native L. cheesmanii forms is low (GST = 0.235), indicating that they share a common genetic background. Nonetheless, L. cheesmanii short is about twice as diverse as L. cheesmanii long or L. cheesmanii f. minor. UPGMA cluster and principal components analysis distinguish four groups within Eulycopersicon: L. pimpinellifolium, cultivated L. esculentum, L. esculentum var. cerasiforme including L. esculentum Gal cer, and L. cheesmanii. The geographic distance and genetic distance in the wild forms of Galápagos tomatoes were not correlated. Apart from the pressure of humans, some native L. cheesmanii populations, especially L. cheesmanii long, might be displaced by invasive L. esculentum Gal cer because they share a similar habitat. We did not find evidence of intercrossing of L. cheesmanii with introduced L. esculentum, but occasional hybridization that contributes to loss of genetic integrity of L. cheesmanii cannot be ruled out. Establishment of reserves of L. cheesmanii to protect this species from introduced herbivorous animals and from hybridization with L. esculentum Gal cer would help to conserve L. cheesmanii. Furthermore, accessions collected by C. M. Rick and others in the 1950s1970s and now stored in germplasm banks could be used to reinstate some extinct populations.
Key Words: amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) endangered species Galápagos Islands genetic resources Lycopersicon cheesmanii Lycopersicon esculentum Solanaceae tomato
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Ghanem, A. Albacete, C. Martinez-Andujar, M. Acosta, R. Romero-Aranda, I. C. Dodd, S. Lutts, and F. Perez-Alfocea Hormonal changes during salinity-induced leaf senescence in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 3039 - 3050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Blanca, J. Prohens, G. J. Anderson, E. Zuriaga, J. Canizares, and F. Nuez AFLP and DNA sequence variation in an Andean domesticate, pepino (Solanum muricatum, Solanaceae): implications for evolution and domestication Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1219 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Hinkle Population structure of Pacific Cordyline fruticosa (Laxmanniaceae) with implications for human settlement of Polynesia Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2007; 94(5): 828 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |