Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Blanca, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nuez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Blanca, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nuez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Blanca, J. M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:86-99.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics

Relationships, origin, and diversity of Galápagos tomatoes: implications for the conservation of natural populations1,,2

Fernando Nuez3, Jaume Prohens and José M. Blanca

Centro de Conservación y Mejora de la Agrodiversidad Valenciana, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Endemic Galápagos tomatoes (Lycopersicon cheesmanii) are of great value for cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) breeding, and therefore their conservation is of significance. Although within L. cheesmanii there is heterogeneity for many traits and formal infraspecific classification is not justified, here we distinguish three forms, without taxonomic significance, of L. cheesmanii that are of interest to breeders because of their distinctive morphology and habitat preferences: L. cheesmanii short’ (one- to two-pinnate leaves, short internodes, and coastal habitats), L. cheesmaniilong’ (one- to two-pinnate leaves, long internodes, and inland habitats), and L. cheesmanii forma minor (three- to four-pinnate leaves, short internodes, and coastal habitats). In a recent survey of tomato populations in the Galápagos Islands, we found that several populations of L. cheesmanii reported 30–50 years earlier had disappeared, mostly as a consequence of human activity. In addition, a previously unreported invasive wild red-fruited form, which we named L. esculentum ‘Gal cer,’ was found on the island of Santa Cruz. The total diversity (estimated with amplified fragment length polymorphisms [AFLPs]) within L. cheesmanii (HT = 0.051) is almost as high as that for the mainland wild species L. pimpinellifolium (HT = 0.072). Lycopersicon esculentum ‘Gal cer,’ on the other hand, has a much lower diversity (HT = 0.014). Comparison of AFLP fragments shared by L. esculentum ‘Gal cer’ with other species showed that it is closely related to weedy tomato L. esculentum var. cerasiforme and, therefore, likely of recent origin. Genetic differentiation among the three native L. cheesmanii forms is low (GST = 0.235), indicating that they share a common genetic background. Nonetheless, L. cheesmaniishort’ is about twice as diverse as L. cheesmaniilong’ or L. cheesmanii f. minor. UPGMA cluster and principal components analysis distinguish four groups within Eulycopersicon: L. pimpinellifolium, cultivated L. esculentum, L. esculentum var. cerasiforme including L. esculentum ‘Gal cer,’ and L. cheesmanii. The geographic distance and genetic distance in the wild forms of Galápagos tomatoes were not correlated. Apart from the pressure of humans, some native L. cheesmanii populations, especially L. cheesmaniilong,’ might be displaced by invasive L. esculentum ‘Gal cer’ because they share a similar habitat. We did not find evidence of intercrossing of L. cheesmanii with introduced L. esculentum, but occasional hybridization that contributes to loss of genetic integrity of L. cheesmanii cannot be ruled out. Establishment of reserves of L. cheesmanii to protect this species from introduced herbivorous animals and from hybridization with L. esculentum ‘Gal cer would help to conserve L. cheesmanii. Furthermore, accessions collected by C. M. Rick and others in the 1950s–1970s and now stored in germplasm banks could be used to reinstate some extinct populations.

Key Words: amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) • endangered species • Galápagos Islands • genetic resources • Lycopersicon cheesmaniiLycopersicon esculentum • Solanaceae • tomato




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. E. Ghanem, A. Albacete, C. Martinez-Andujar, M. Acosta, R. Romero-Aranda, I. C. Dodd, S. Lutts, and F. Perez-Alfocea
Hormonal changes during salinity-induced leaf senescence in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 3039 - 3050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. M. Blanca, J. Prohens, G. J. Anderson, E. Zuriaga, J. Canizares, and F. Nuez
AFLP and DNA sequence variation in an Andean domesticate, pepino (Solanum muricatum, Solanaceae): implications for evolution and domestication
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1219 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. E. Hinkle
Population structure of Pacific Cordyline fruticosa (Laxmanniaceae) with implications for human settlement of Polynesia
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2007; 94(5): 828 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.