Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taneda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taneda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taneda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, M.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:1949-1959.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

The criteria for biomass partitioning of the current shoot: water transport versus mechanical support1

Haruhiko Taneda2 and Masaki Tateno

Nikko Botanical Garden, Graduated School of Science, University of Tokyo. Nikko Botanical Garden, Graduated School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Nikko, Tochigi, 321-1435

In this study, we determine the theoretical criteria for biomass partitioning into the leaf and stem of the current shoot, using two quantitative models. The water transport model, based on the biochemical model of CO2 assimilation, predicts the relationship between the water transport capacity per biomass investment in the stem (stem mass specific conductivity) and the partitioning of biomass that maximizes shoot productivity. The mechanical support model, based on Euler's buckling formula, predicts the relationship between the mechanical strength per biomass investment in the stem (the inverse relationship of stem mass density) and the partitioning of biomass to avoid mechanical failures such as lodging. These models predict the stem properties of mass specific conductivity and stem mass density that result in optimum partitioning just sufficient to provide adequate water transport and static mechanical support. In reality, the stem properties of plants differ from those predicted for optimum partitioning: the partitioning of biomass in the current shoot of both angiosperms and gymnosperms is mainly governed by the mechanical support criterion, although gymnosperms are probably more affected by the water transport criterion. This tendency is supported by actual measurements of biomass partitioning in plants.

Key Words: Angiosperms • gymnosperms • hydraulic conductivity • mechanical stability • tree architecture




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Jagels and G. E Visscher
A synchronous increase in hydraulic conductive capacity and mechanical support in conifers with relatively uniform xylem structure
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2006; 93(2): 179 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.