Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orr, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sundberg, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Orr, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sundberg, M. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Orr, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sundberg, M. D.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:165-173.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Development and Morphogenesis

Inflorescence development in a new teosinte: Zea nicaraguensis (Poaceae)1

Alan R. Orr2,4 and Marshall D. Sundberg3

2Department of Biology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa 50614 USA; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Emporia State University, Emporia, Kansas 66801 USA

Inflorescence development in a newly discovered teosinte, Zea nicaraguensis (Poaceae), from Nicaragua has been investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM examination revealed that the pattern of both male and female inflorescence development was similar to previously described inflorescence in other Zea taxa. Branch primordia were initiated acropetally in a distichous pattern along the rachis of male and female inflorescences. Spikelet pair primordia bifurcated into pedicellate and sessile spikelet primordia. Predictably, pedicellate spikelet development was arrested and aborted in the female teosinte inflorescence. Organogenesis of functional spikelets and florets was similar to that previously described in maize and teosintes. The results were consistent with our hypothesis that both femininity and masculinity share a common mechanism of inflorescence development in Zea and Tripsacum and are in accord with a putative common mechanism of sex determination in the Andropogoneae. Interestingly, this population of teosinte, unique in its ability to grow in water-logged soils, showed a stable pattern of early inflorescence development. Our results also revealed the uncharacteristic presence of inflorescence polystichy in this population of Zea nicaraguensis. We propose this novel phenotypic variation raises the possibility that a domestic evolution of polystichy in maize was enabled by an occasional polystichous phenotypic in teosinte.

Key Words: development • evolution • inflorescence • maize • organogenesis • Poaceae • teosinte • Zea






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.