HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Matas, A. J. Articles by Niklas, K. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Matas, A. J. Articles by Niklas, K. J. Agricola Articles by Matas, A. J. Articles by Niklas, K. J.

Biomechanics and anatomy of Lycopersicon esculentum fruit peels and enzyme-treated samples¹

²Department of Horticulture, Estación Experimental La Mayora (CSIC), Algarrobo-Costa 29750, Malaga, Spain; ³Department of Plant Breeding, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA; ⁴Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA; ⁵Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA

We report the biomechanics and anatomy of fruit wall peels (before and after cellulase/pectinase treatment) from two Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars (i.e., Inbred 10 and Sweet 100 cherry tomatoes). Samples were tested before and after enzyme treatment in uniaxial tension to determine their rate of creep, plastic and instantaneous elastic strains, breaking stress (strength), and work of fracture. The fruit peels of both cultivars exhibited pronounced viscoelastic and strain-hardening behavior, but differed significantly in their rheological behavior and magnitudes of material properties, e.g., Inbred 10 peels crept less rapidly and accumulated more plastic strains (but less rapidly), were stiffer and stronger, and had a larger work of fracture than Sweet 100 peels. The cuticular membrane (CM) also differed; e.g., Sweet 100 CM strain-softened at forces that caused Inbred 10 to strain-harden. The mechanical behavior of peels and their CM correlated with anatomical differences. The Inbred 10 CM develops in subepidermal cell layers, whereas the Sweet 100 CM is poorly developed below the epidermis. Based on these and other observations, we posit that strain-hardening involves the realignment of CM fibrillar elements and that this phenomenon is less pronounced for Sweet 100 because fewer cell walls contribute to its CM compared to Inbred 10.

Key Words: cellulose microfibrils • epidermis • fruit cracking • plant biomechanics • Solanaceae • strain-hardening • tomato fruit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Guillon, S. Philippe, B. Bouchet, M.-F. Devaux, P. Frasse, B. Jones, M. Bouzayen, and M. Lahaye Down-regulation of an Auxin Response Factor in the tomato induces modification of fine pectin structure and tissue architecture J. Exp. Bot., February 10, 2008; (2008) erm323v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Lopez-Casado, A. J. Matas, E. Dominguez, J. Cuartero, and A. Heredia Biomechanics of isolated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit cuticles: the role of the cutin matrix and polysaccharides J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2007; (2007) erm233v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Saladie, A. J. Matas, T. Isaacson, M. A. Jenks, S. M. Goodwin, K. J. Niklas, R. Xiaolin, J. M. Labavitch, K. A. Shackel, A. R. Fernie, et al. A Reevaluation of the Key Factors That Influence Tomato Fruit Softening and Integrity Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 1012 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Matas, G. Lopez-Casado, J. Cuartero, and A. Heredia Relative humidity and temperature modify the mechanical properties of isolated tomato fruit cuticles Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2005; 92(3): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Bargel and C. Neinhuis Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit growth and ripening as related to the biomechanical properties of fruit skin and isolated cuticle J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2005; 56(413): 1049 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]