Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Rodríguez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by González-Rodríguez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by González-Rodríguez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, K.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:401-409.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Population Biology

Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks1

Antonio González-Rodríguez2,5, Dulce M. Arias3, Susana Valencia4 and Ken Oyama2

2Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro No. 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, 58190 Michoacán, México; 3Centro de Educación Ambiental e Investigación Sierra de Huautla, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, 62210, Morelos, México; 4Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F. 04510, México

Quercus affinis and Q. laurina are two closely related Mexican red oaks with partially overlapping distributions. Within the area of overlap, there are localities where morphological intergradation occurs. A previous hypothesis explained this pattern as a result of secondary contact between the two species, followed by hybridization and introgression. This possibility was analyzed here by examining foliar and genetic variation in 16 localities situated along a macrogeographic gradient, which included morphologically representative populations of both species and populations from within the area of overlap. Maximum-likelihood hybrid index scores calculated from nine semi-diagnostic RAPD markers indicated a shift in the genetic composition of populations from one species to the other along the macrogeographic gradient, with genetically intermediate populations situated in the area of overlap. Foliar variation followed a partially congruent pattern, but Q. laurina-like morphology predominated in some of the genetically intermediate populations. There were several instances of correlated frequency changeovers of single RAPD markers and morphological characters along the macrogeographic gradient and a few cases of markedly parallel patterns between markers. The results were interpreted as consistent with a hypothesis of secondary contact between the two oak species that has resulted in some differential introgression among markers.

Key Words: hybrid zones • hybridization • Quercus affinisQuercus laurina • RAPD markers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. Gugerli, J.-C. Walser, K. Dounavi, R. Holderegger, and R. Finkeldey
Coincidence of Small-scale Spatial Discontinuities in Leaf Morphology and Nuclear Microsatellite Variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a Mixed Forest
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2007; 99(4): 713 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. Tovar-Sanchez and K. Oyama
Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1352 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.