HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schwilk, D. W. Articles by Ackerly, D. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schwilk, D. W. Articles by Ackerly, D. D. Agricola Articles by Schwilk, D. W. Articles by Ackerly, D. D.

Is there a cost to resprouting? Seedling growth rate and drought tolerance in sprouting and nonsprouting Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae)¹

Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 USA

ABSTRACT

Many woody plant species that depend upon fire-cued seed germination lack the ability to resprout. As the ability to resprout is widely assumed to be the ancestral condition in most plant groups, the failure to sprout is an evolutionary derived trait. Models for the evolutionary loss of sprouting assume a trade-off between seedling success and vegetative resprouting ability of adults. Such models require higher seedling success rates in nonsprouters than in sprouters. On the other hand, there seem to be few a priori reasons why a strong sprouter might not also have highly competitive post-fire seedlings. To test the hypothesis that nonsprouting plants have higher growth rates and/or drought survival, we grew seedlings of Ceanothus tomentosus from sprouting and nonsprouting populations in a common garden experiment. Each of these C. tomentosus populations was paired with a sympatric Ceanothus species that differed in resprouting ability. Sprouters exhibited greater allocation to root carbohydrate storage than did nonsprouters, but overall relative growth rates did not differ. Nonsprouters had earlier onset of flowering. These results provide mixed support for models of a sprouting/nonsprouting allocation trade-off.

Key Words: allocation • carbon storage • fire • iteroparity • nonsprouters • sprouters

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Fisher Anatomy of axis contraction in seedlings from a fire prone habitat Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2008; 95(11): 1337 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Climent, M{a}. A. Prada, R. Calama, M{a}. R. Chambel, D. S. de Ron, and R. Alia To grow or to seed: ecotypic variation in reproductive allocation and cone production by young female Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis, Pinaceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2008; 95(7): 833 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Tierney and G. M. Wardle The relative fitness of parental and hybrid Kunzea (Myrtaceae): The interaction of reproductive traits and ecological selection Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2008; 95(2): 146 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]