Am. J. Bot. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibarra-Cerdeña, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Cordero, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ibarra-Cerdeña, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Cordero, V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ibarra-Cerdeña, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Cordero, V.
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:503-509.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Reproductive Biology

Pollination ecology of Stenocereus queretaroensis (Cactaceae), a chiropterophilous columnar cactus, in a tropical dry forest of Mexico1

Carlos N. Ibarra-Cerdeña2, Luis I. Iñiguez-Dávalos3,4 and Víctor Sánchez-Cordero2

2Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-153, 04510, Mexico, D. F., Mexico; 3Instituto Manantlán de Ecología y Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Universidad de Guadalajara, Av. Independencia Nacional 151, 48900, Autlán, Jalisco, Mexico

ABSTRACT

Flowers of columnar cacti are animal-pollinated, often displaying a chiropterophylic syndrome. This study examined if the columnar cactus Stenocereus queretaroensis, a tropical species endemic to western Mexico, is bat-pollinated, by studying its pollination biology and the foraging behavior of potential pollinators. Flowers were produced in winter through spring, peaking in April. Anthesis was nocturnal, and stigma and anther turgidity began around 2200 hours. Production of nectar secretion and highest sugar concentration and energy supply were nocturnal, peaking between 2200 and 2400 hours. Manual auto-pollination and exclusion experiments showed that self-pollination yielded no fruits, while nocturnal pollinators resulted in high fruit set and seed set compared to diurnal pollination treatments. The nectar-feeding bat Leptonycteris curasoae (Phyllostomidae) was the main nocturnal pollinator with the highest effective pollination. Peak bat visitation coincided with peaks in nectar production. The high abundance of L. curasoae throughout the 4-yr study, suggests that it is a seasonally reliable pollinator for this columnar cactus. While pollination syndromes have been increasingly called into question in recent years, this study suggests that at least for this system, there is a fairly close fit between pollinator and pollination syndrome.

Key Words: Cactaceae • columnar cacti • Leptonycteris curasoae • mutualism • nectar-feeding bat • pollination ecology • Stenocereus queretaroensis • west central Mexico




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. Bustamante and A. Burquez
Effects of Plant Size and Weather on the Flowering Phenology of the Organ Pipe Cactus (Stenocereus thurberi)
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2008; 102(6): 1019 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. Arias-Coyotl, K. E. Stoner, and A. Casas
Effectiveness of bats as pollinators of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in wild, managed in situ, and cultivated populations in La Mixteca Baja, central Mexico
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1675 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.