HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gross, C. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gross, C. L. Agricola Articles by Gross, C. L.

A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes—more monoecy but why?¹

Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351 Australia

ABSTRACT

Rainforests in tropical Australia occupy a very small, discontinuous area (<1% of the continent), yet they are floristically diverse (c. 2800 vascular species) with high endemicity. There is a distinctive Gondwanan and autochthonous element, and some of the world's ancestral links to the basal angiosperms are uniquely found here. The rainforests can be evergreen or deciduous, but there is a distinct dry season with intermittent drought years. With these characters, the evolutionary pressures on species may be very different to that experienced elsewhere. Sexual systems of 1113 tree species (83 families) from northern Australia were compared with published accounts from the paleo- and neotropics. Hermaphroditic systems dominated all tree floras, and within all floras but Australia dioecy was the most common unisexual system. In tropical Australia, however, significantly more monoecy than dioecy occurred at landscape and community levels. Incorporating phylogeny revealed that sex and fruit types are significantly clustered. The Euphorbiaceae and Sapindaceae contributed c. 50% of the monoecious taxa. Inefficient pollinators (e.g., beetles) may have favored the maintenance of monoecy at the expense of dioecy in the Australian tropics although <1% of the flora has been studied for pollinators and none of the monoecious tree species.

Key Words: Australian rainforest • meta-analysis • monoecy • phylogenetic conservatism • pollinator efficiency • supertree

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X.-S. Chen and Q.-J. Li Patterns of plant sexual systems in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests in Ailao Mountains, SW China J Plant Ecol, September 1, 2008; 1(3): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]