Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haston, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haston, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haston, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, J. A.
(American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1359-1371.)
© 2005 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Systematics

A phylogenetic reappraisal of the Peltophorum group (Caesalpinieae: Leguminosae) based on the chloroplast trnL-F, rbcL and rps16 sequence data1

Elspeth M. Haston2,4, Gwilym P. Lewis3 and Julie A. Hawkins2

2The School of Plant Sciences, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK; 3The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW 9 3AB, UK

ABSTRACT

The monophyly of the Peltophorum group, one of nine informal groups recognized by Polhill in the Caesalpinieae, was tested using sequence data from the trnL-F, rbcL, and rps16 regions of the chloroplast genome. Exemplars were included from all 16 genera of the Peltophorum group, and from 15 genera representing seven of the other eight informal groups in the tribe. The data were analyzed separately and in combined analyses using parsimony and Bayesian methods. The analysis method had little effect on the topology of well-supported relationships. The molecular data recovered a generally well-supported phylogeny with many intergeneric relationships resolved. Results show that the Peltophorum group as currently delimited is polyphyletic, but that eight genera plus one undescribed genus form a core Peltophorum group, which is referred to here as the Peltophorum group sensu stricto. These genera are Bussea, Conzattia, Colvillea, Delonix, Heteroflorum (inedit.), Lemuropisum, Parkinsonia, Peltophorum, and Schizolobium. The remaining eight genera of the Peltophorum group s.l. are distributed across the Caesalpinieae. Morphological support for the redelimited Peltophorum group and the other recovered clades was assessed, and no unique synapomorphy was found for the Peltophorum group s.s. A proposal for the reclassification of the Peltophorum group s.l. is presented.

Key Words: Bayesian analysis • Caesalpinioideae • cladistic analysis • classification • Fabacaceae • molecular data • parsimony • phylogeny




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Nyffeler
The closest relatives of cacti: insights from phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast and mitochondrial sequences with special emphasis on relationships in the tribe Anacampseroteae
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2007; 94(1): 89 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. J. McKenzie, E. M. Muller, A. K. W. Skinner, P. O. Karis, and N. P. Barker
Phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation in subtribe Arctotidinae (Asteraceae: Arctotideae) inferred by DNA sequence data from ITS and five chloroplast regions
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1222 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Botanical Society of America, Inc.