|
|
||||||||
a Instituto Fitotécnico de Santa Catalina (FCAF, UNLP)-Centro de Investigaciones Genéticas (UNLP-CONICET-CIC), C.C. 4, 1836 Llavallol, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and b Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: B chromosome B transmission rate control maize maize native races Poaceae Zea mays ssp. mays
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Variation in B transmission rate (B-TR) is a common feature of B inheritance, in such a way that the Bs tend to be lost in some progenies and to increase in number in others, compared to Mendelian expectation. The genetic control of this transmission rate has been demonstrated in some animal species, i.e., Myrmeleotettix maculatus (grasshopper; Shaw and Hewitt, 1985; Shaw, Hewitt, and Anderson, 1985), Pseudococcus affinis (mealybug; Nur and Brett, 1987, 1988), Eyprepocnemis plorans (grasshopper; Herrera et al., 1996), and in some plants, i.e., Hypochoeris maculata (Parker, Taylor, and Ainsworth, 1982), Secale cereale (Romera, Jiménez, and Puertas, 1991; Jiménez et al., 1995, 1997), Aegilops speltoides (Cebriá, Navarro, and Puertas, 1994), and Allium schoenoprassum (Bougourd and Plowman, 1996).
We have investigated the existence of genetic control of B-chromosome transmission rate (B-TR) selecting H and L B-TR genotypes on the male and female side, from a population of the maize native race Pisingallo. First, we obtained one generation (G0) from f.0B x m.1B (G0m) and f.1B x m.0B (G0f) crosses within a random sample of seeds collected from the original population. Second, we made crosses selecting individuals showing the highest and the lowest B-TR values (G1m and G1f). Selection gain was obtained demonstrating the presence of genotypes controlling B-TR on both male and female sides (Rosato et al., 1996).
The objectives of this paper were: (a) to continue the selection for H and L B-TR in two new generations (G2 and G3) and (b) to locate the genes that control B-TR by making 0B female x 2B male (G3) crosses between selected individuals from G2 with the highest and the lowest B-TR.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the experimental crosses carried out with population VAV 6313 involving three generations of selection for high (H) or low (L) B-TR on the male side. B-TR was estimated as the quotient between the mean number of Bs transmitted to the progeny and the number of Bs of the parental plant that carried them. To score for B number, primary root tips were pretreated with 0.002 mol/L 8-hydroxyquinoleine for 3 h at 20°-22°C and subsequently fixed in ethanol:acetic acid (3:1). Root tips were then squashed in propionic haematoxilin (2%) with ferric citrate as a mordant (Núñez, 1968).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test. | RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
= 57.619, P < 0.00001). G2 progeny resulting from f.0B x m.2B crosses within the L B-TR group was B-TRL ± SE = 0.48 ± 0.01 (Table 2). The frequency of individuals with 2B was not significantly lower than the Mendelian expectation (
= 0.588, P = 0.443). The L B-TR and H B-TR obtained in G2 were significantly different according to the results from the Kruskal-Wallis test (F = 10.691, df = 1, 13, P = 0.0011).
The mean B-TR of the G3 progeny resulting from f.0B (H) x m.2B (H) crosses was: B-TRH ± SE = 0.71 ± 0.04 (Table 3). The frequency of individuals with 2B was significantly higher than the Mendelian expectation (
= 23.04, P < 0.00001).
The mean B-TR of the G3 progeny resulting from f.0B (L) x m.2B (L) crosses was: B-TRL ± SE = 0.48 ± 0.04 (Table 4). The frequency of individuals with 2B was not significantly lower than the Mendelian expectation (
= 0.286, P = 0.593).
Mean B-TR values of both H (F = 0.3680, df = 1, 10, P = 0.5576) and L (F = 0.0753, df = 1, 11, P = 0.7888) selected lines did not show significant differences between G2 and G3 generations.
The mean B-TR of the G3 progeny resulting from f.0B (H) x m.2B (L) crosses was: B-TR ± SE = 0.70 ± 0.05 (Table 5); this value does not significantly differ from the B-TR from f.0B (H) x m.2B (H) (P = 0.99882). The frequency of individuals with 2B was also significantly different from Mendelian expectation (
= 21.893, P < 0.00001).
The mean male B-TR of the G3 progeny resulting from f.0B (L) x m.2B (H) crosses was: B-TR ± SE= 0.48 ± 0.04 (Table 6); this value does not significantly differ from the B-TR from f.0B (L) x m.2B (L) (P = 0.99906). The frequency of individuals with 2B was not significantly higher than the Mendelian expectation (0.5) (
= 0.39, P < 0.532).
In all cases most individuals were 0B or 2B, and the frequency of 1B or 4B plants was very low (Tables 16![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
).
There were significant differences in the B-TR between groups (1 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 4; Table 7) when H and L B-TR female progenitors were considered (F = 26.453, df = 1, 18, P < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference was found between H and L B-TR groups (1 vs. 2 and 3 vs. 4; Table 7) when male mean B-TR progenitors were considered (F = 0.040, df = 1, 18, P = 0.8436) (Table 7).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, B-TR values of G2 and both f.0B (L) x m.2B (L) and f.0B(L) x m.2B (H) crosses of G3 were close to 0.5, indicating that in this group the B-TR is Mendelian. On the contrary, the B-TR values in the H B-TR group in G2 and both f.0B (H) x m.2B (H) and f.0B (H) x m.2B (L) crosses of G3 were significantly higher than the Mendelian expectation of 0.5. We therefore conclude that in the L genotype the Bs are randomly transmitted to the progeny in f.0B x m.2B crosses, whereas in the H genotype they show a strong accumulation.
Localization of genes controlling B-TR
The mean B-TR resulting from f.0B (H) x m.2B (H) and f.0B (H) x m.2B (L) crosses was significantly higher than the mean B-TR from f.0B (L) x m.2B (L) and f.0B (L) x m.2B (H) crosses. However, crosses of f.0B (H) x m.2B (H) and f.0B (H) x m.2B (L) on one hand, and f.0B (L) x m.2B (H) and f.0B (L) x m.2B (L) on the other were not significantly different. These results indicate that the genetic control of B-TR is independent of which genotype (H or L B-TR) the 2B male progenitor possesses. On the contrary, the genotype of the 0B female progenitor seems to determine the resulting B-TR.
According to Carlson (1986) the preferential fertilization mechanism is partially understood. This phenomenon is not due to either B migration to a certain pole during the process of nondisjunction at the second pollen grain mitosis or to a determinate position of the sperm nuclei with and without Bs in the pollen tube during its germination (Shi et al., 1996). Carlson (1986) suggests that the Bs confer a certain competitive ability during fertilization to the sperm nucleus that carries them, but the nature of this competitive ability is still unknown. However, a female effect on preferential fertilization was found in a maize line that inhibits preferential fertilization when used as female progenitor (Carlson, 1969). Our results indicate, for the Pisingallo maize population (VAV 6313), that the B-TR genotype of the receptor f.0B plant determines the rate by which the egg is fertilized by the sperm nucleus carrying 2B. In addition, since in our experimental design the female progenitor has no Bs, we conclude that these genes are located on the regular A chromosome set.
Carlson (1978, 1986) considered that there are two possible hypotheses to explain the ability of Bs to undergo preferential fertilization. The first assumes that a specific effect of the proximal region of the B chromosome occurs. The second assumes a nonspecific effect of extra chromatin in the sperm nucleus. Our results suggest that the detection of differences between sperm with and without Bs is controlled by the female genotype. Thus, some genotypes increase the frequency of fertilization by B-carrying sperm, whereas other genotypes do not. The latter result in a random fertilization of the 0B or 2B sperm nucleus results in a Mendelian B-TR. All these results indicate that the presence of B chromosomes determines the sperm phenotype which would be accepted by the egg cell.
On the other hand, Rosato et al. (1996) determined by crosses f.1B x m.0B that B-TR is also genetically controlled on the female side. They also obtained two groups: a H B-TR group (Mendelian B-TR = 0.5), and a L B-TR (B-TR = 0.4). Considering these results of Rosato et al. (1996) and those of the present paper, it could be concluded that there is an equilibrium that keeps the frequency of individuals with Bs in the population. This equilibrium would be kept by the balance among "anti-B" genes, causing a reduction in female B-TR, and "pro-B" genes causing an increase in male B-TR, but controlled by the female progenitor genotype.
It was recently determined that genes controlling B-TR in rye act on the meiotic behavior of the Bs and that they are located on the B chromosomes (Jiménez et al., 1997; Puertas et al., 1998). The difference between H and L B-TR lines in rye is due to a different ability of 2B individuals to form univalents (L line) or bivalents (H line) at metaphase l. When the Bs form univalents, they are eliminated as micronuclei and most pollen grains have no Bs. On the contrary, in maize, the meiotic behavior of 1B and 2Bs individuals belonging to either the H and L B-TR groups indicates that L B-TR is independent from pairing frequency or meiotic loss of the B chromosome (Chiavarino et al., 1997b). Also, the results here show an effect of the female parent that is not controlled by pairing. The contrasting results in maize and rye show that their B-TR is genetically controlled in a different manner. It is interesting to note that the basic mechanism of B accumulation in all Poaceae consists of nondisjunction in the pollen, whereas the mechanisms controlling the B-TR to the progeny seem to be species specific.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
4 Author for correspondence (phone-FAX: 541-2981566). ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bougourd, S. M., and A. B. Plowman.1996The inheritance of B chromosomes in Allium schoenoprassum L. Chromosome Research 4: 151158. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Carlson, W. R.1969Factors affecting preferential fertilization in maize. Genetics 62: 543554.
.1978The B chromosome of corn. Annual Review of Genetics 12: 523. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
.1986The B chromosome of maize. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 3: 201226.
, and T-S. Chou.1981B chromosome nondisjunction in corn: Control by factors near the centromere. Genetics 97: 379389.
and R. Roseman.1992A new property of the maize B chromosome. Genetics 131: 211223. [Abstract]
Cebriá,A., M. L. Navarro, and M. J. Puertas.1994Genetic control of B chromosome transmission in Aegilops speltoides (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 15021507. [CrossRef][ISI]
Chiavarino, A. M., M. Rosato, J. Cámara Hernández, C. A. Naranjo, and L. Poggio.1997aB chromosomes in native races of maize from Argentina. I. Populational frequency and altitude. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter (USA) 71: 4547.
, , C. A. Naranjo, J. Cámara Hernández, and L. Poggio.1995B chromosome polymorphism in N. Argentine populations of maize. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter (USA) 69: 94.
, , P. Rosi, C. A. Naranjo, and L. Poggio.1997bB chromosomes in native races of maize from Argentina. III. Selection of H and L transmission genotypes and meiotic behavior of Bs. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter (USA) 71: 4849.
Jiménez, M. M., F. Romera, A. Gallego, and M. J. Puertas.1995Genetic control of the rate of transmission of rye B chromosomes II. 0B x 2B crosses. Heredity 74: 518523. [ISI]
, , M. González-Sanchez, and M. J. Puertas.1997Genetic control of the rate of transmission of rye B chromosomes III. Male meiosis and gametogenesis. Heredity 78: 636644. [CrossRef][ISI]
Herrera, J. A., M. D. López-León, J. Cabrero, M. W. Shaw, and J. P. M. Camacho.1996Evidence for B chromosome drive suppression in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Heredity 76: 633639. [ISI]
Longley, A. E.1938Chromosomes of maize from North American Indians. Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 177195.
McClintock, B., T. A. Kato-Y, and A. Blumenschein.1981Constitución cromosómica de las razas de maíz. Su significado en la interpretación de relaciones entre las razas y variedades en las Américas. Colegio de Postgraduados. Chapingo, México.
Naranjo, C. A., A. M. Chiavarino, M. Rosato, E. Quintela Fernández, and L. Poggio.1995Tamaño del genoma y polimorfismo para cromosomas B en razas nativas Argentinas y Bolivianas de maíz. Proceeding of III Latin American and XVI Andean Zone of Maize Researchers Meeting (Bolivia) Tomo II: 969980.
Núñez, O.1968An acetic haematoxylin squash method for small chromosomes. Caryologia 21: 115119. [ISI]
Nur, U., AND B. L. H. Brett.1987Control of meiotic drive of B chromosomes in the mealybug Pseudococcus affinis (obscurus). Genetics 115:499510.
, and .1988Genotypes affecting the condensation and transmission of heterochromatic B chromosomes in the mealybug Pseudococcus affinis. Chromosoma 96: 205212. [CrossRef][ISI]
Parker J. S., S. Taylor, and C. C. Ainsworth.1982The B chromosome system of Hypochoeris maculata. III. variation in B chromosome transmission rates. Chromosoma 85: 299310. [CrossRef][ISI]
Puertas, M. J., M. González-Sanchez, S. Manzanero, F. Romera, and M. M. Jimenez.1998Genetic control of the rate of transmission of rye B chromosomes. IV. Localization of the genes controlling B transmission rate. Heredity 80: 209213. [CrossRef][ISI]
Randolph, L. F.1941Genetic characteristics of the B chromosomes in maize. Genetics 26: 608631.
Roman, H.1947Mitotic nondisjunction in the case of interchanges involving of the B type chromosome in maize. Genetics 32: 391409.
.1948Directed fertilization in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 34: 3642. [CrossRef]
Romera, F., M. M. Jimenez, and M. J. Puertas.1991Genetic control of the rate of transmission of rye B chromosomes. I. Effects in 2B x 0B crosses. Heredity 66: 6165. [ISI]
Rosato, M., A. M. Chiavarino, C. A. Naranjo, J. Cámara Hernández, and L. Poggio.1998Genome size and numerical polymorphism for the B chromosome in races of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays, Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 168174. [Abstract]
, , , M. J. Puertas, and L. Poggio.1996Genetic control of B chromosome transmission rate in Zea mays ssp. mays (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 11071112. [CrossRef][ISI]
Shaw, M. W., and D. A. Anderson.1985Polymorphism in rates of meiotic drive acting on the B-chromosome of Myrmeleotettix maculatus. Heredity 55: 6168. [ISI]
, and G. M. Hewitt.1985The genetic control of meiotic drive acting on the B-chromosome of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Heredity 54: 187194. [ISI]
Shi, L., T. Zhu, H. L. Mogensen, and P. Keim.1996Sperm identification in maize by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Plant Cell 8: 815821. [Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. V. Lia, V. A. Confalonieri, and L. Poggio B Chromosome Polymorphism in Maize Landraces: Adaptive vs. Demographic Hypothesis of Clinal Variation Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |