Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szalanski, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szalanski, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Szalanski, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:177-180.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Origin and conservation genetics of the threatened Ute ladies'-tresses, Spiranthes diluvialis (Orchidaceae)1

Allen L. Szalanski2,1, Gerry Steinauer3, Richard Bischof1 and Jessica Petersen1

1 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583 USA; 3 Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, Nebraska 68503 USA

Received for publication July 13, 2000. Accepted for publication October 12, 2000.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The Ute ladies'-tresses, Spiranthes diluvialis, is listed as a threatened orchid in west-central United States by the Federal government. Information on its origin and patterns of genetic variation is needed to develop effective conservation strategies for this species. DNA sequencing and polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used to evaluate genetic variation and structure of 23 populations of S. diluvialis. In addition, four congeneric species were analyzed to determine possible origins of the putative allotetraploid S. diluvialis. DNA sequencing and PCR-RFLP analysis of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA noncoding regions revealed no genetic variation within or among populations of S. diluvialis. DNA sequencing revealed that S. diluvialis has rDNA of both S. magnicamporum and S. romanzoffiana, supporting the proposed origin of the allotetraploid. Parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses of cpDNA and mtDNA sequences revealed that these S. diluvialis organellar sequences were most closely related to those of S. romanzoffiana, providing evidence that the latter species is the maternal parent of S. diluvialis. The lack of genetic diversity is significant for the development of a long-term conservation strategy for S. diluvialis.

Key Words: phylogenetics • population genetics • Orchidaceae • Spiranthes • threatened species


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The Ute ladies'-tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis Sheviak) (Orchidaceae) is a terrestrial, insect-pollinated orchid (Sipes and Tepedino, 1995 ), with scattered populations throughout west-central United States (Dressler, 1981 ; Heidel, 1997 ; Hildebrand, 199 8). Sheviak (1984) suggested that, based on morphological and cytological data, S. diluvialis (2n = 74) originated as the allopolyploid offspring of a cross between S. magnicamporum Sheviak (2n = 30) and S. romanzoffiana Chamisso (2n = 44). In 1992, S. diluvialis was listed as a federally threatened species because of relatively low population numbers, fluctuations in monitored population size, loss of the species' riparian habitat through urban development, stream channelization, recreational development, and exotic species invasion (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992 ).

Comparative population studies using both biochemical (allozyme) and molecular genetic methods are needed to obtain information on the levels and patterns of genetic diversity in wild orchids (Wong and Sun, 1999 ). Several aspects of conservation biology, such as determining the extent of genetic diversity in conservation programs and restoration of threatened populations, can only be addressed by detailed population genetic studies (Hamrick and Godt, 1995 ).

A previous allozyme study by Arft and Ranker (1998) revealed high levels of genetic variation within but low levels of genetic differentiation among 12 populations of S. diluvialis from Utah and Colorado. In recent years, several new and widely distributed Ute ladies'-tresses populations have been found that have not been subjected to genetic analyses. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent and distribution of genetic variation within and among populations of S. diluvialis representing its entire geographical range. This information may be valuable for conservation and recovery planning efforts for the species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife, 1995 ). DNA sequence variation analysis of nuclear and maternally inherited chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA was conducted to test the hypothesis that S. maginicamporum and S. romanzoffiana are the parental species of S. diluvalis. We employed DNA sequencing and polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphims (PCR-RFLP) of nuclear and maternally inherited noncoding DNA regions for this study. PCR-RFLP is a relatively simple, reliable, repeatable, and inexpensive technique that uses dried specimens unlike allozyme analysis and provides discreet character states that can be used for phylogenetic analyses and diagnostics (Taylor and Szalanski, 1999 ).


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Plant materials
Leaf samples were collected from 22 populations of S. diluvialis throughout its geographical range in full compliance with a permit issued to G.S. by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Table 1). Populations of S. magnicamporum, S. romanzoffiana, S. cernua (L.) L.C. Richard, and S. vernalis Engelman and Gray were also sampled (Table 1). Western prairie fringed orchid, Platanthera praeclara Sheviak and Bowles, was collected to act as the outgroup taxon. Individual leaf samples, 10 x 60 mm, were stored in plastic bags with silica gel prior to analysis. Whole-plant vouchers of each species were deposited in the Charles E. Bessey Herbarium, University of Nebraska State Museum, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. Voucher leaf samples from each sampled orchid were deposited in the plant materials collection of the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Summary of the species sampled, their location, and the number of individuals analyzed from each population

 
DNA analysis
DNA was isolated from individual 5 x 30 mm leaf tissue samples using the Puregene DNA isolation kit D-5000A (Gentra, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). The nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS1 and ITS2 regions were amplified using the primers ITS5 and ITS4 (Baldwin, 1992 ). The cpDNA tRNA-Ser to tRNA-fMET noncoding region was amplified with the universal primers trnS and trnfM (Demesure, Sodzi, and Petit, 1995 ). A portion of the mtDNA NAD 7 gene noncoding region was amplified with the universal primers NAD7–1 and NAD7–2 (Demesure, Sodzi, and Petit, 1995 ). PCR was conducted using 1.0 µL of isolated DNA per Szalanski et al. (2000) with the thermocycler conditions outlined by Baldwin (1992) for the ITS marker and Demesure, Sodzi, and Petit (1995) for the cpDNA and mtDNA markers.

For DNA sequencing of the rDNA, mtDNA, and cpDNA markers, amplified DNA from five S. diluvialis (Boulder County, Colorado; Madison County, Idaho; Jefferson County, Montana; Unitah County, Utah; and Sioux County, Nebraska), one S. vernalis (Lancaster County, Nebraska), one S. magnicamporum (Pottawattamie County, Iowa), one S. romanzoffiana (Boulder County, Colorado), one S. cernua (Garfield County, Nebraska) and one P. Praeclara was purified following Szalanski et al. (2000) and sent to the DNA Sequencing Facility, Iowa State University (Ames, Iowa, USA) for direct sequencing in both directions. Consensus sequences for each individual were derived using GCG (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) GAP program. The GenBank accession numbers for each sequence are GBAN-AF243329–AF243333, GBAN-AF301440–AF301445, and GBAN-AF301464–AF301469.

For PCR-RFLP analysis of the specimens that were not subjected to DNA sequencing, restriction sites were predicted from the DNA sequence data using Webcutter 2.0 (Heiman, 1997 ). Amplified DNA was digested according to manufacturer's (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Massachusetts) recommendations per Cherry et al. (1997) using the restriction enzymes Hha I, Hinf I, Msp I, and Scrf I for the ITS amplicon, Alu I, Apo I, and Dpn II for the cpDNA amplicon, and Alu I, Rsa I, and ScrF I for the mtDNA amplicon. Fragments were separated by vertical polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) following Taylor et al. (1997) .

Data analysis
Ribosomal, chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA sequences were aligned with GCG PILEUP program (with a gap weight of 5.0 and a gap length weight of 1.0) and adjusted manually using Platanthera praeclara as the outgroup taxon. Maximum likelihood and unweighted parsimony analysis on the alignments was conducted with PAUP* 4.0b2 (Swofford, 1999 ). Gaps were treated as missing characters for all analysis. The reliability of trees was tested with a bootstrap test (Felsenstein, 1985), which included 1000 resamplings. For the maximum likelihood analysis, rates were assumed to follow a gamma distribution with shape parameter estimated via maximum likelihood based on the general-time-reversible reversible model (GTR) (Yang, 1994). A total of 73 distinct data patterns were used under this model for the rDNA ITS1 data set, 150 for the mtDNA data set, and 31 for the cpDNA data set. The starting branch lengths were obtained using the Rogers-Swofford approximation method.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
LITERATURE CITED
 
The ITS amplicon was 746 bp in size for S. diluvialis, S. magnicamporum, and S. romanzoffiana. The cpDNA amplicon was 947 bp in size for S. diluvialis and ranged from 921 to 965 bp among the other four Spiranthes species. The mtDNA amplicon was 1147 bp for all of the S. diluvialis and varied from 1085 to 1153 among the other Spiranthes taxa. PCR-RFLP analysis of the rDNA ITS marker from 116 S. diluvialis using four restriction enzymes detected 22 sites and screened 98 bp or 13% of the 746 bp amplicon. Analysis of the cpDNA marker detected 12 sites and screened 6% of the amplicon and PCR-RFLP of the mtDNA marker detected 15 sites and screened 67 bp. No genetic variation was observed among the 116 S. diluvialis subjected to RFLP analysis. PCR-RFLP did not detect any intraspecific genetic variation in the other sampled Spiranthes taxa using the restriction enzymes used for S. diluvialis, bud did differentiate the five Spiranthes taxa

DNA sequencing of five S. diluvialis revealed no genetic variation in the rDNA, mtDNA, and cpDNA amplicons. The rDNA sequences of the five Spiranthes species were aligned using Platanthera praeclara as the outgroup taxon. The alignment of the rDNA sequences, resulted in a total of 781 characters, including gaps. Of these characters, 265 (34%) were variable and 18 (2%) were informative. The rDNA data set had only one most parsimonious tree (length = 294, CI = 0.98, CI excluding uninformative sites = 0.76) as documented using the Exhaustive search algorithm of PAUP*, which examined all possible trees of this data set. Bootstrap analysis of the aligned Spiranthes species and P. praeclara rDNA ITS1 sequences revealed that S. vernalis, and S. cernua formed a distinct clade and S. romanzoffiana was the most divergent Spiranthes taxon (Fig. 1). Regardless of whether the starting tree was the most parsimonious tree or was obtained via stepwise addition, the maximum likelihood search found only one tree. This maximum likelihood tree, -Ln likelihood = 2164.37635, was similar to the most parsimonious tree. Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS data matix reveals S. diluvialis and S. magnicamporum as the sister to the S. vernalis–S. cernua clade. Spiranthes romanzoffiana is supported as the sister clade to all of the other species of Spiranthes. The lack of a distinct relationship of S. diluvialis with S. romanzoffiana or S. magnicamporum may be due to heterogeneity at nine nucleotide sites within the S. diluvialis sequences. Analysis of the DNA sequence data in an electropherogram format confirmed that the heterogeneity was from nucleotide polymorphism in S. romanzoffiana and S. magnicamporum being present at the same nucleotide site in S. diluvialis.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Maximum parsimony cladogram generated by PHYLIP from five Spiranthes spp. ITS1 and ITS2 amplicon sequences. Platanthera praeclara is the outgroup taxon. Bootstrap values from 1000 data sets are provided

 
The alignment of the mtDNA sequences resulted in a total of 1275 characters, including gaps. Of these characters, 157 (12%) were variable and 24 (2%) were parsimony informative. Both the parsimony analysis and maximum likelihood analysis (-Ln likelihood = 2712.77886) found only one tree (Fig. 2). Spiranthes diluvialis formed a sister group with S. romanzoffiana, and S. magnicamporum, S. vernalis, and S. cernua formed a distinct clade. All of the phylogenetic relationships were supported by >50% of the bootstraps. Because of a large number of tandem repeats in the 3' end of the cpDNA sequences, the sequences were truncated. The alignment of the truncated cpDNA sequences resulted in a total of 512 characters, including gaps. Of the 512 characters, 39 (8%) were variable and 3 (1%) were parsimony informative. The maximum likelihood tree (-Ln likelihood = 888.01117) found only one tree. Results from the cpDNA data set were similar to those from the mtDNA datset (Fig. 2).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Maximum parsimony cladogram generated by PHYLIP from the cpDNA amplicon sequences of five Spiranthes spp. Platanthera praeclara is the outgroup taxon. Bootstrap values from 1000 data sets are provided

 
Because S. diluvialis is thought to be an allotetraploid between S. romanzoffiana and S. magnicamporum (Sheviak, 1984 ; Arft and Ranker, 1998 ), the most parsimonious explanation of the rDNA heterogeneity of S. diluvialis involves additivity of the rDNA repeat of S. romanzoffiana with those of S. magnicamporum. This additivity in allotetraploids has been observed in other plant species including Tragopogon mirus Ownbey (Soltis and Soltis, 1991 ; Soltis et al., 1995 ).

Phylogenetic analysis of mtDNA and cpDNA, which is maternally inherited, revealed that S. diluvialis was more closely related to S. romanzoffiana than to S. magnicamporum providing evidence that S. romanzoffiana is the maternal parent of S. diluvialis. Our results support previous biochemical (Arft and Ranker, 1998 ) and morphological evidence (Sheviak, 1984 ) that S. romanzoffiana and S. magnicamporum are the parental species of S. diluvialis. In addition, based on cpDNA and mtDNA sequences, S. romanzoffiana appears to be the maternal parent of S. diluvialis.

There is no evidence for phylogeographic differentiation in S. diluvialis based on DNA sequencing and PCR-RFLP analysis of 116 individuals from 23 populations. This finding is supported by a previous allozyme study. Arft and Ranker (1998) concluded that the high level of allozyme diversity observed within populations of S. diluvailis appeared to be the result of its allopolypoloid condition. This is supported by high levels of fixed, or nearly fixed, heterozygosity at several loci. In addition, allozyme divergence among S. diluvailis populations was low relative to other animal-pollinated, outcrossed, diploid species (Arft and Ranker, 1998 ; Hamrick et al., 1991 ). Low levels of genetic variation have been observed in Spiranthes hongkongensis Hu & Barr. (Sun, 1997 ).

The ultimate goal of conservation is to ensure the continuous survival of populations and to maintain their evolutionary potential (Hamrick and Godt, 1995 ). Priority for genetic conservation is based on the level of genetic diversity and the degree of gene differentiation between populations (Coates and Sokolowski, 1992 ).

The present study revealed no genetic differentiation among or within populations representing the known geographical range of S. diluvialis using ITS, cpDNA, and mtDNA noncoding markers. Based on this, no populations of S. diluvialis are presently known that would be conservation priorities because of their genetic uniqueness.


   FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank S. Wessel, W. Fertig, E. Rey-Vizgirdas, T. Naumann, L. Armstrong, L. Riedel, S. Spackman, B. Moseley, B Heidel, L. England, and D. Nelson for collecting plant materials; and David B. Taylor and Richard Peterson II for thoughtful suggestions that improved the presentation of this paper. This work was supported in part by a USFWS section 6 grant, and matching support from the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. This is paper number 13039 of the Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Research Division. Back

2 Author for correspondence (e-mail: aszalans{at}unlserve.unl.edu ). Back


   LITERATURE CITED
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Arft, A. M., and T. A. Ranker. 1998 Allopolyploid origin and population genetics of the rare orchid Spiranthes diluvialis. American Journal of Botany 85: 110–122[Abstract]

Baldwin, B. G. 1992 Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3–16[CrossRef][Medline]

Cherry, T., A. L. Szalanski, T. C. Todd, AND T. O. Powers. 1997 The internal transcribed spacer region of Belonolaimus (Nemata: Belonolaimidae). Journal of Nematology 29: 21–29

Coates, D. J., and R. E. S. Sokolowski. 1992 The mating system and patterns of genetic variation in Bankia cuneta A. S. George (Proteaceae). Heredity 69: 11–20[ISI]

Demesure, B., N. Sodzi, and R. J. Petit. 1995 A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Molecular Ecology 4: 129–131[Medline]

Dressler, R. 1981 The spiranthoid and orchidoid orchids. In The orchids, 166–200. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Felsenstein, J. 1985 PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164–166

Hamrick, J. L., and M. J. W. Godt. 1995 Conservation genetics of endemic species. In J. C. Avise and J. L. Hamrick [eds.], Conservation genetics, 281–304. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA

———, ———, D. A. Murawske, and M. D. Loveless. 1991 Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: implications for conservation biology. In D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger [eds.], Genetics and conservation of rare plants, 75–86. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

Heidel, B. 1997 Interim report on the conservation status of Spiranthes diluvialis Sheviak in Montana. Unpublished report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana, USA

Heiman, M. 1997 Webcutter 2.0. <http://firstmarket.com/firstmarket/cutter/cut2.html>

Hildebrand, T. 1998 1997 inventory for Spiranthes diluvialis Sheviak in western Nebraska. Unpublished report to the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

Sheviak, C. J. 1984 Spiranthes diluvialis (Orchidaceae), a new species from the western United States. Brittonia 36: 8–14[CrossRef][ISI]

Sipes, S. D., and V. J. Tepedino. 1995 Reproductive biology of the rare orchid, Spiranthes diluvialis: breeding system, pollination, and implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 9: 929–938[CrossRef][ISI]

Soltis, P. S., and D. E. Soltis. 1991 Multiple origins of the allotetraploid Tragopogon mirus (Compositae): rDNA evidence. Systematic Botany 16: 407–413[CrossRef][ISI]

———, G. M. Plunkett, S. J. Novak, and D. E. Soltis. 1995 Genetic variation in Tragopogon species: additional origins of the allotetraploids T. mirus and T. miscellus (Compositae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1329–1341[CrossRef][ISI]

Sun, M. 1997 Genetic diversity in three colonizing orchids with contrasting mating systems. American Journal of Botany 84: 224–232[Abstract]

Swofford, D. L. 1999 PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA

Szalanski, A. L., D. S. Sikes, R. Bischof, and M. Fritz. 2000 Population genetics and phylogenetics of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 589–594[CrossRef]

Taylor, D. B., R. D. Peterson II, A. L. Szalanski, and J. J. Petersen. 1997 Mitochondrial DNA variation among Muscidifurax spp. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), pupal parasitoid of filth flies. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90: 814–824

———, and A. L. Szalanski. 1999 Identification of Muscidifurax spp. by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Biological Control 15: 270–273[CrossRef]

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992 Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to list the plant Spiranthes diluvialis (Ute Ladies'-Tresses) as a threatened species. Federal Register 57: 2048–2053

———. 1995 Ute ladies'-tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis) recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado, USA

Wong, K. C., and M. Sun. 1999 Reproductive biology and conservation genetics of Goodyera procera (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1406–1413[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang, Z. 1994 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 306–314[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
I. Avila-Diaz and K. Oyama
Conservation genetics of an endemic and endangered epiphytic Laelia speciosa (Orchidaceae)
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2007; 94(2): 184 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Sun and K. C. Wong
Genetic structure of three orchid species with contrasting breeding systems using RAPD and allozyme markers
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2001; 88(12): 2180 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szalanski, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szalanski, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Szalanski, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS