|
|
||||||||
Reproductive Biology |
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Calle 43, No. 130, Col. Chuburná de Hidalgo, CP 97200, Mérida, Yucatán, México
Received for publication November 7, 2000. Accepted for publication April 3, 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Agavaceae anther embryo sac henequén megasporogenesis microsporogenesis ovule pollen
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 yr, after which they die. Throughout its life span, henequén propagates mainly by means of its rhizomes whose apical meristems emerge at a distance from the parent plant, giving rise to new individuals. The flowers develop at the top of large inflorescences that can reach 38 m high and, after flowering, bulbils originate from buds beneath bracteoles on the inflorescence. However, in spite of their potential utility, bulbils and seeds are not usually used for commercial propagation and have not been used for breeding processes (Eastmond, Herrera, and Robert, 2000)
Fruits develop abnormally because carpels remain empty, probably due to insufficient pollination, and the few seeds that mature show low germination less than 10%. Both phenomena could be due to the pentaploid chromosome level of the species (5x = 150; Castorena-Sánchez, Escobedo, and Quiroz, 1991), which may be responsible for the low fertility of the species. Conversely, in the wild species A. angustifolia, which is a fertile hexaploid (6x = 180; Castorena-Sánchez, Escobedo, and Quiroz, 1991), seed germination is as high as 73% (Colunga-García Marín et al., 1999
). This led us to include it in this study for comparative purposes. In spite of its economic importance, conventional breeding techniques have never been applied to henequén, probably because its long life span and low fertility have made it almost impossible to carry out genetic improvement. No attempts have been made to cross henequén with other agave species and no natural hybrids have been reported. The only successful program to hybridize hard fiber-producing agaves was started by Doughty in Tanzania in 1931 (Doughty, 1936
) and culminated in the release of hybrid 11648 (A. angustifolia x A. amaniensis) x A. amaniensis (Lock, 1962
).
In order to develop alternative methods for the improvement of henequén, Robert et al. (1987, 1992)
used in vitro culture to micropropagate high-yielding individuals and to form a germplasm collection. The micropropagated plants that originated in vitro by shoot multiplication are genetically stable and are performing satisfactorily in the field. However, the genetic homogeneity in the vegetatively propagated plantations is still a problem, and the generation of new genetic variability would be highly desirable in order to prevent susceptibility to microbial diseases and other threats to the plantations. Sexual reproduction offers the best alternative to generate the variability needed for improvement programs. Nevertheless, until reliable knowledge of the sexual reproductive process of agaves in general and of henequén in particular is available, this will remain a difficult task.
This is the first report of morphological and histological studies of the sexual reproductive system of A. fourcroydes and its wild relative A. angustifolia. We analyzed male gametophyte (pollen or microgametophyte) and female gametophyte (embryo sac or megagametophyte) development in both species to understand how gametes are formed and what causes the differences in fertility.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
9201000 J/m2 during the year.
Histological studies
The collected flower buds were measured and cut into two parts: the upper part, with the anthers, was used to study microsporogenesis and the lower part, containing the ovaries, was used for the analysis of megasporogenesis. Samples were fixed for 48 h in a solution of FAA (Berlin and Miksche, 1976
) consisting of 40% formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid, 95% ethanol and distilled water, 10 : 5 : 50 : 35 parts, respectively, and then dehydrated through a graded ethanol series before being infiltrated and embedded in plastic resin (JB-4 Glycol Methacrylate, Polysciences, Los Angeles, California, USA). Transverse and longitudinal sections (710 µm) were cut with a microtome, stained with toluidine blue, and mounted in Permount (SPI5500, Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA). Series of sections of the flower buds, anthers, and ovaries were studied and photographed using a Zeiss compound microscope. A total of 100 anthers and ovaries from different plants were studied.
Estimation of pollen fertility
Pollen fertility was evaluated in two different ways: by acetocarmine staining and through in vitro germination. Apparently "good" pollen is spherical and deeply stained. In order to determine the viability of the pollen grains, in vitro germination by the hanging-drop method was tested on two media: (1) 2% sucrose, 0.05% boric acid, and 0.10.2% agar; (2) 2% glucose, 200 mg/L calcium chloride, 0.06% boric acid, 2 mg/L glycine, and vitamins: 0.05 mg/L folic acid, 0.5 mg/L thiamine, 0.5 mg/L nicotinic acid, 0.5 mg/L pyridoxine, and 0.05 mg/L biotin. A pollen grain was considered viable if it produced a tube longer than the diameter of the grain (Roberts et al., 1983
). To determine the statistical difference in pollen fertility/sterility between the two species, a standard t test was carried out using the Sigma Stat package (Jandel Scientific Software, Chicago, USA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollen morphology and fertility
The morphology of the pollen of A. fourcroydes is very similar to that of A. angustifolia. The pollen grains are binuclear with vegetative and generative nuclei, monosulcate with two distal pores, and have a reticulate exine (Figs. 19, 20). A few differences between the two species can be observed in the pollen ornamentation and apertures (Ludlow-Wiechers and Ojeda, 1983
; Ojeda, Ludlow, and Orellana, 1984
). The proportion of spherical, mature pollen grains ("good pollen") differs between the two species:
48.9 ± 1.5% for A. angustifolia and
33.6 ± 0.08% for A. fourcroydes (Figs. 19, 20). This difference is statistically significant (t = 8.98 with 4.00 degrees of freedom at P
0.005, 95% confidence interval). The sterility of the pollen grains was also different: a very high frequency (66.4 ± 0.8%) of abnormal pollen grains was observed in henequén (Fig. 18) and 51.1 ± 1.5% for A. angustifolia. The difference between means is statistically significant (t = 6.65 with 2.00 degrees of freedom at P
0.022, 95% confidence interval). The percentage of germinated pollens that produced only short pollen tubes was very low (0.5 ± 0.08%). Occasionally, it was observed that in media 2, adjusted with vitamins, there was a slight increase in germination (1%) and in the length of the pollen tubes (Figs. 21, 22). On the other hand, pollen viability in A. angustifolia was
3 ± 0.8% but the difference was not statistically significant. During germination the generative cells formed two sperm cells after another mitotic division (Fig. 22).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both species have the same vegetative and sexual reproductive strategies and are remarkably similar at the morphological and biochemical levels (Colunga-García Marín and May-Pat, 1997
; Colunga-García Marín et al., 1999
). However, A. angustifolia is a hexaploid species that produces a high percentage of fertile seeds. It is interesting to note that there is very little information regarding the development of the reproductive system of the Agavaceae (Wunderlich, 1950
; Gentry, 1982
), and these studies are limited to some aspects of pollination (Arizaga et al., 2000
; Slauson, 2000)
, nectar production, and seed viability (Schaffer and Schaffer, 1977, 1979
; Freeman and Reid, 1985
), while little is known about other aspects such as gametogenesis. In this paper we discuss the stages of anther and ovary development in henequén related to flower growth, compare them to those of A. angustifolia, and discuss the possible causes of the low fertility of the former.
Principal stages of gametophyte development
Flower development and maturation begin at the lowermost buds in the inflorescence and proceed upwards. The principal stages of gametophyte development are described in Table 2 and show the correlation of anther ontogeny and ovary differentiation with flower bud length. Both processes may be divided into three phases. Phase I (premeiosis) encompasses the early proliferative stages, the differentiation of the locules as well as the establishment of the PMC, and the formation of MMC. Phase II (meiotic stage) extends from the onset of the PMC and MMC meiosis to the appearance of the microspores and functional megaspores. Phase III (postmeiosis) begins at microspore mitosis and extends to the maturation of pollen grains of the male gametophyte and the formation of the embryo sac.
The results in Table 2 show that some important events of male and female gametogenesis are asynchronous. Microsporogenesis starts before megasporogenesis and, as a result, pollen maturity and anther dehiscence occur before the stigma becomes receptive. This pattern (protandria) is similar for both A. fourcroydes and A. angustifolia and has been described for other species such as A. sisalana (Lock, 1962
) and A. lechugilla (Freeman and Reid, 1985
). This asynchrony of gametophyte development might be a common pattern for the genus Agave. Self-pollination is therefore unlikely within the same flower, but mature pollen could fall on receptive flowers developing on lower parts of the scape.
Male gametophyte development
Microsporogenesis in A. angustifolia and A. fourcroydes with the "successive type" of meiosis was recognized because cell walls formed after the first cell division (Fig. 16). Although most stages of the process of male gamete formation in both agaves are apparently normal, pollen grains showed a very low in vitro germination rate: 3% for A. angustifolia and 0.5% for A. fourcroydes. This could reflect some meiotic and mitotic aberrations during microsporogenesis, due to their polyploid nature. Alternatively, it could be due to the influence of tapetal malfunction (Fig. 14), since it is widely assumed that the tapetum plays an important role during microsporogenesis and the maturation of the pollen grains (Chapman, 1987
).
Although in vitro germination cannot reproduce exact in vivo conditions (Roberts et al., 1983
), we believe it can be a useful tool to relate pollen quality (viability) to normal male gametophyte development, as previously discussed by Janssen and Hermsen (1976)
.
Female gametophyte: ovule and embryo sac development
According to Dahlgren, Clifford, and Yeo (1985)
, the female gametophyte of the Agavoideae is generated from the only functional megaspore via megagametogenesis (Polygonum type). However, in A. fourcroydes and A. angustifolia, we found a bisporic type of megasporogenesis (similar to Allium) but not the Polygonum type. The female gametophyte in henequén develops directly into an embryo sac from the two viable megaspores. These megaspores divide mitotically twice resulting in the migration of the nuclei and in the maturation of the embryo sac. Failures in meiosis might have resulted in the formation of abortive megaspores with a distorted chromosome balance that lead to the degradation of the nuclei and the occurrence of numerous empty embryo sacs (Fig. 25). It is apparent from the anatomy of the carpels and ovaries that structural maturation of the embryo sacs is not regular in some parts of the locules, and this could be the reason for the low fertility of the female gametophyte.
The results so far show that the formation of male and female gametophyte in henequén is abnormal at the meiotic and postmeiotic stages and that these alterations might be responsible for the low fertility shown by this species. These results should be useful for future henequén breeding research using pollination, fertilization, and zygotic embryo rescue.
|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Author for correspondence and reprint requests (npiven{at}cicy.mx
). ![]()
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Berlin G. P. J. P. Miksche 1976 Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. 3rd ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA
Castorena-Sanchez I. R. M. Escobedo A. Quiroz 1991 New cytotaxonomical determinants recognized in six taxa of Agave in the sections Rigidae and Sisalanae. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1257-1264
Chapman G. P. 1987 The tapetum. In K. L. Giles and J. Pracash [eds.], Pollen: cytology and development. International Review of Cytology 107: 111-125[CrossRef]
Colunga-GarcÍa Marin P. J. Coello-Coello L. E. Eguiarte D. Piñero 1999 Isozymatic variation and phylogenetic relationships between henequén (Agave fourcroydes) and its wild ancestor A. angustifolia (Agavaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 115-123
Colunga-GarcÍa Marin P. F. May-Pat 1993 Agave studies in Yucatan, Mexico. I. Past and present germplasm diversity and uses. Economic Botany 47: 312-327[ISI]
Colunga-GarcÍa Marin P. F. May-Pat 1997 Morphological variation of henequén (Agave fourcroydes, Agavaceae) germplasm and its wild ancestor (A. angustifolia) under uniform growth conditions: diversity and domestication. American Journal of Botany 84: 1449-1465[Abstract]
Cruz C. R. Orellana M. L. Robert 1985 Agave research progress in Yucatan. Desert Plants 7: 71-73, 80, 8992
Dahlgren R. M. T. H. T. Clifford P. F. Yeo 1985 The families of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution and taxonomy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Doughty L. R. 1936 Chromosome behavior in relation to genetics of Agave. 1. Seven species of fibre Agaves. Journal of Genetics 33: 197-205[ISI]
Eastmond A. J. L. Herrera M. L. Robert 2000 La biotecnología aplicada al henequén: alternativas para el futuro. CICY (Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C.), Mérida, Yucatán, México
Freeman C. E. W. H. Reid 1985 Aspects of the reproductive biology of Agave lechuguilla Torr. Desert Plants 7: 75-80
Gentry H. S. 1982 Agaves of continental North America. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Janssen A. W. B. J. G. Th. Hermsen 1976 Estimating pollen fertility in Solanum species and haploids. Euphytica 25: 577-586[CrossRef][ISI]
Lock G. W. 1962 Sisal. Longmans, Green, London, UK
Ludlow-Wiechers B. L. Ojeda 1983 El pollen del genero Agave de la Península de Yucatán. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 44: 29-42
Ojeda L. B. Ludlow-Wiechers R. Orellana 1984 Palinología de la familia Agavaceae para la Península de Yucatán. Biótica 9: 379-398
Robert M. L. J. L. Herrera J. L. Chan F. Contreras 1992 Micropropagation of Agave spp. In Y. P. S. Bajaj [ed.], Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 19, High-tech and micropropagation III, 306309. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Robert M. L. J. L. Herrera F. Contreras K. N. Scorer 1987 In vitro propagation of Agave fourcroides Lem. (Henequen). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 8: 37-48
Roberts I. N. T. C. Gaude G. Harrod H. G. Dickinson 1983 Pollen-stigma interections in Brassica oleracea; a new pollen germination medium and its use in elucidating the mechanism of self incompatibility. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 65: 231-238[CrossRef][ISI]
Schaffer W. M. V. Schaffer 1977 The reproductive biology of Agavaceae: pollen and nectar production in four Arizona agaves. Southwestern Naturalist 22: 157-168
Schaffer W. M. V. Schaffer 1979 The adaptive significance of variations in reproductive habit in the Agavaceae II: pollinator foraging behavior and selection for increased reproductive expenditure. Ecology 60: 1051-1069[CrossRef][ISI]
Slauson L. A. 2000 Pollination biology of two chripterophilous agaves in Arizona. American Journal of Botany 87: 825-836
Wunderlich R. 1950 Die Agavaceae Hutchinsons im Lichte ihrer Embryologie, ihres Gynözeuim-Staubblatt-Blattbaues. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 97: 437-502[CrossRef]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |