Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzbach, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rieseberg, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzbach, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rieseberg, L. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzbach, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rieseberg, L. H.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:270-277.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Transgressive character expression in a hybrid sunflower species1

Andrea E. Schwarzbach3,2, Lisa A. Donovan4 and Loren H. Rieseberg2

2 Indiana University, Department of Biology, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA; 4 University of Georgia, Department of Botany, Athens, Georgia 30602 USA

Received for publication October 14, 1999. Accepted for publication April 20, 2000.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Diploid hybrid lineages often are ecologically distinct from their parental species. However, it is unclear whether this niche divergence is typically achieved via hybrid intermediacy, a mixture of parental traits, and/or the evolution of extreme (transgressive) morphological and ecophysiological features. Here we compare an extensively studied hybrid sunflower species, Helianthus anomalus, with its putative parents, H. annuus and H. petiolaris, for 41 morphological and 12 ecophysiological traits. Helianthus anomalus was morphologically intermediate for one trait (2.4%), parental-like for 23 traits (56.1%), and transgressive for 17 traits (41.5%). For ecophysiological traits, H. anomalus was not significantly different from one or both parents for nine traits (75%), and was transgressive for the remaining three (25%). Thus, H. anomalus appears to be a mosaic of parental-like and transgressive phenotypes. Although the fitness effects of the transgressive characters are not yet known, many of these characters are consistent with adaptations reported for other sand dune plants. Genetic studies are currently underway to ascertain whether these extreme characters arose as a direct byproduct of hybridization or whether they evolved via mutational divergence.

Key Words: adaptations • carbon isotope ratios • Helianthus • hybridization • photosynthesis • speciation • transgressive segregation • water-use efficiency


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
A requirement for a new diploid hybrid species to survive and not be outperformed by its parental species is niche separation between parent and hybrid lines (Lewontin and Birch, 1966 ; Grant, 1981 ; Templeton, 1981 ; Schluter, 1998 ; Buerkle et al., in press). Empirical data support this hypothesis and identify most stabilized hybrids as ecologically different from their parents (Abbott, 1992 ; Arnold, 1997 ; Rieseberg, 1997 ). A major question that has not yet been studied in detail concerns the origin of the adaptations that allow derived hybrid lineages to colonize new habitats.

Four possibilities have been suggested. First, it is possible that the habitats are intermediate between those of the parental species and thus most easily colonized by hybrids. Even habitats that appear divergent relative to those of the parental species may actually be intermediate with respect to the morphological and ecophysiological parameters required. Second, it may be that a mixture of parental traits is required to colonize the new habitat. For example, a hybrid derivative of a salt-tolerant, shade species and a freshwater, sun species might be able to colonize a saline, sunny habitat. Third, hybridization may somehow generate extreme or transgressive phenotypes that enable colonization of habitats that are truly extreme or novel relative to that of either parent. The latter hypothesis has received recent support from quantitative trait locus (QTL) studies (reviewed in Rieseberg, Archer, and Wayne, 1999 ), which indicate that transgressive phenotypes are an expected consequence of hybridization between genetically divergent lineages. Finally, it may be that the morphological and physiological adaptations required for niche colonization have arisen through mutational divergence following hybrid lineage formation. However, this would require hybrid lineage establishment in the absence of niche divergence—an unlikely scenario according to theoretical models (McCarthy, Asmussen, and Anderson, 1995 ; Buerkle et al., in press).

We have initiated a series of ecological and genetic studies to distinguish among these explanations with respect to the colonization of sand dune habitats by a well-characterized hybrid sunflower species, Helianthus anomalus. This paper reports on the results of the first of these studies, in which we quantified morphological and ecophysiological differences that distinguish H. anomalus from its putative parental species, H. annuus and H. petiolaris. We ask whether morphological and ecophysiological traits exhibited by H. anomalus are intermediate, parental-like, or extreme when compared to its parents. We also ask whether extreme characters that are identified are consistent with other known adaptations to sand dune habitats.

Both parental species, H. annuus and H. petiolaris, are widespread taxa (Fig. 1) that mainly grow in disturbed sites. Helianthus petiolaris typically occurs at higher elevations than H. annuus, but there are many locations where they overlap. They appear to have different ecological preferences as well, with H. annuus preferring heavier more mesic soils and H. petiolaris more xeric sandy habitats (Heiser, 1947 ). The two parental species are not sister taxa, but occur in divergent clades (Fig. 2) based on morphological evidence (Schilling and Heiser, 1981), nuclear ribosomal DNA (Rieseberg, 1991 ), and chloroplast DNA (Rieseberg et al., 1991 ).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Distribution map of Helianthus petiolaris, H. annuus, and H. anomalus (redrawn from Rogers, Thompson, and Seiler, 1982)

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree for Helianthus section Helianthus based on combined chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA data (redrawn from Rieseberg, 1991 ). Numbers of character state changes are given above branches, and bootstrap percentages are given below branches

 
Helianthus anomalus is a rare endemic species adapted to sand dune and swale habitats in Utah and northern Arizona (Heiser, 1958 ; Heiser et al., 1969 ; Rieseberg, 1991 ). Based on its occurrence in sand dune habitats, it frequently has been cited as potentially being more drought tolerant than either parental species and thus a candidate to improve cultivated sunflower germplasm (Heiser, 1978 ; Thompson, Zimmerman, and Rogers, 1981 ; Nabhan and Reichhardt, 1983 ). In addition, much work has been done to describe and characterize the two parental species separately or together, although cultivated lines of H. annuus were often used instead of wild accessions (Heiser, 1947, 1961 ; Sobrado and Turner, 1983a, b, 1986 ). However, the rare hybrid species never has been comparatively studied with its parents under controlled conditions.

Hence, we quantified species differences under common greenhouse conditions. We grew the plants under well-watered and fertilized conditions and compared the three wild species for many of the morphological and ecophysiological (photosynthesis, stomatal and cuticular conductance, water-use efficiency) characters that have been known or suggested to differ among them. In addition, to investigate possible differences in drought tolerance, the species were compared for ecophysiological responses to one short-term water stress treatment.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We used achenes from wild populations of Helianthus annuus from Utah, jct. I-15 and Hwy. 6, exit 261, east side (Rieseberg no. 1286); H. petiolaris from Utah 1/4 mi E of Zion park entrance on Hwy. 9 (Rieseberg no. 1287); and H. anomalus from Utah, 26.5 mi S of Hanksville on Hwy. 95 (Rieseberg no. 1273). Achenes were collected from a large number of individuals (>50) for each species and pooled. We only chose one population as a species representative for the following reasons: (1) There are only small genetic differences within species (Rieseberg, Carter, and Zona, 1990 ; Rieseberg and Seiler, 1990 ; Rieseberg, 1991 ). Interspecific genetic identities are at least 96% for chloroplast DNA and isozyme data. (2) Morphological variation within species is also clearly smaller than between species (Heiser 1954, 1961 ; Heiser et al., 1969 ).

The greenhouse study was conducted at the University of Georgia, Athens campus, starting 25 August 1998. About 50 randomly selected achenes from each species were germinated in petri dishes. The fruit wall was incised with a razor blade, and the achenes were placed on moist paper tissue containing 1% (w/v) gibberellic acid in sterilized distilled water. Previous experiments had shown that without any special treatment the percentage of seed germination was low. After 2 d, the fruit wall was removed, and the seeds kept at 4°C in the dark. The paper substrate was changed daily to avoid fungal growth. The cold treatment helped to synchronize the germination of all three species, holding back the seeds that germinated earlier. After 5 d, roots started growing, and the petri dishes were placed in a sunny place for 2 d. After 1 wk, 20 individuals of each species were planted (day 0) in 25 cm diameter plastic pots containing a 3:1 mixture of sand/fritted clay (Turface, Profile Products LLC, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA) and randomly assigned to a randomized block design with four blocks, and five individuals of each species per block. Except for the duration of the drought experiment, the plants were watered twice daily and fertilized every 4th d. High-intensity metal halide lamps supplemented sunlight for 16 h per day. Several plants did not survive the early seedling stage and were subsequently excluded from measurements. In all, 9–15 individuals of each species were analyzed.

Morphological measurements
Starting the 3rd d after planting, total plant height was measured on a 2-d cycle for the first 17 d after planting. Thereafter, height was measured on a 4-d cycle, with the last measurement taken on day 93. Side branches eventually overtop the main stem and in those cases the tallest branch was measured. Leaves were counted on the same days as height measurements until day 57, at which time the last individual had terminated the main stem with the production of a flower head. Only leaves along the main stem, including the cotyledons, were counted, and we used this measurement as one indicator for early plant growth. Growth curves were plotted for plant height and leaf number.

Under well-watered conditions, a mature leaf of each individual was chosen and measurements were taken of its wet mass, length and width of leaf blade, leaf petiole length, and leaf area (LI-COR 3100 area meter, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). The leaves were dried at 60°C, weighed again, and then used for chemical analyses (see below). When the first signs of a terminal flower head appeared, the time (in days after planting) was recorded. All of the study species produced multiple flower heads, and the number of heads was counted on day 62. When all disk flowers of a head had opened, the first three heads per individual were measured for head diameter and phyllary (bracts surrounding the head) number, length, width, and area. Leafy phyllaries, which are larger and more leaf-like than the rest, and present in some individuals, were also counted. Additionally, the number of ray flowers per head and ligule lengths and widths were measured.

Disk flowers were hand-pollinated daily (with a bulked mix of pollen from all individuals of the same species) until all flowers had opened, and the heads were harvested and dried at the end of the season. The number of disk flowers and achenes were counted, and seed set was calculated as a proportion of the total number of disk flowers. The achenes were weighed and measured for length, thickness, and width. The ratio of width and thickness was used as an index for shape where a value of 1 indicates a round cross section and a value <1 indicates a more flattened shape.

On day 93, stem diameter 2 cm above the ground and the distance between the ground and the first branch were measured. After harvesting on day 100, soil was gently removed from the roots by washing. The length and width of the total root system were used to estimate volume explored, and the angle of lateral roots relative to horizontal was determined. The taproot, if present, was measured for length. Since the plants were not pot bound, these root measurements provide an approximate descriptor of root morphology.

Ecophysiological measurements
On day 50 the photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), and internal CO2 concentrations (ci) of one fully mature leaf of comparable age (at about the same height of plant) were measured with a LI-COR 6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR Inc.; ambient CO2 concentration 350 ppm, air temperature 26°C, photosynthetically active radiation 1500 µmol·m-2·sec-1). The difference between leaf and air temperature in the cuvette was also recorded. Measurements were made on well-watered plants between 0930 and 1400, and preliminary measurements indicated no midday stomatal closure during this time. Instantaneous ci was used as a comparative estimate of instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE) since ambient CO2 concentration, leaf temperature, and {Delta}w (leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit) were similar for all individuals (Ehleringer, Phillips, and Comstock, 1992 ; Donovan and Ehleringer, 1994 ). A higher ci reflects lower or less conservative instantaneous WUE. Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE) was calculated from A, leaf nitrogen (by micro-Dumas combustion technique, Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) and specific leaf area (Field, Merino, and Mooney, 1983 ; Field and Mooney, 1986 ).

Leaf carbon isotope ratios ({delta}13C) were measured using continuous flow mass spectrometry (University of Georgia Stable Isotope/Soil Biology Laboratory) in order to estimate leaf-lifetime integrated ci and WUE (Farquhar, Ehleringer, and Hubick, 1989 ; Donovan and Ehleringer, 1994 ). A more negative {delta}13C reflects a lower or less conservative integrated WUE.

Cuticular conductance was measured on day 85 for well-watered plants. Starting at 0800 one fully expanded leaf per plant was harvested, weighed immediately, placed with its petiole in beakers of water, and kept in a dark room to reach full hydration. After 3 h the leaves were removed from the beaker, petioles sealed with parafilm, and the leaves were weighed. Leaves were then placed in a dark box filled with silica gel desiccant to induce complete stomatal closure. Weight measurements were repeated every 30 min for the next 270 min to determine cuticular conductance, calculated as the rate of water loss per unit leaf area of leaf blade.

The plants were subjected to a short-term drought by withholding water starting on day 56. When each plant reached leaf wilting point (visible turgor loss), we measured A, gs, and ci of a wilted leaf (leaves of comparable age were chosen), and excised leaf water potential (pressure chamber; PMS, Corvallis, Oregon, USA). The plants were watered immediately after the measurements were taken to avoid fatal water stress situations.

Data analysis
Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with block and species as independent variables. Significant mean differences between species were determined with an LSD multiple range test. We corrected for the unequal sample sizes by reducing power based on the smaller sample size. We did not find any block effects and therefore block statistics are not further reported. When a character differed significantly among species, the character was reported as transgressive (negative or positive) if the value for H. anomalus significantly exceeded the parental values. Otherwise the character pattern of H. anomalus relative to the parental species was reported as intermediate, H. petiolaris-like, or H. annuus-like.

A mean growth curve for each species was plotted and one-way ANOVA was used to detect differences between the means for each measuring date. Since multiple tests were conducted, P values were Bonferroni corrected (Rice, 1989 ). Differences for cuticular conductances were calculated by comparing the mean slope for the water loss curves for each species using one-way ANOVA.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Morphological characters
We compared H. annuus, H. petiolaris, and the hybrid species H. anomalus for 41 morphological characters: 31 single characters and ten combined characters. Our study revealed significant species differences for 40 of the 41 characters (Table 1). The only character that did not show any species effect was the length of the taproot.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Morphological character expression in H. annuus, H. petiolaris, and in the hybrid derivative H. anomalus (mean ± 1 SE).1

 
Although H. anomalus comprised morphological characters from both parents, only one character (2.4% of all morphological characters) was intermediate, achene thickness (Table 1). H. anomalus was H. petiolaris-like (i.e., not significantly different from H. petiolaris) for 17 characters (41.5%), and H. annuus-like for five characters (12.2%). One character did not differ for all three species (2.4%). A total of 17 characters (41.5%) were transgressive: 12 negatively transgressive and five positively transgressive.

Plant growth, measured as increase in height and leaf number, differed with developmental stage (Fig. 3a, b, c). Helianthus annuus had the greatest height for a large part of the entire season, but did not significantly differ from H. petiolaris between days 37 and 77. Helianthus anomalus did not initially differ from H. petiolaris, but between days nine and 17 it was significantly taller than H. petiolaris (Fig. 3a; P < 0.01). All three species terminate their main stem with a flower head before the plants branch, so branches eventually overtop the main stem. Helianthus petiolaris produced side branches earlier than the other two species, resulting in an increase in growth rate starting at ~day 34 vs. ~day 44 in H. anomalus and H. annuus (Fig. 3b). Eventually, H. annuus outgrew H. petiolaris and was the tallest species by the end of the experiment, while H. anomalus was clearly the shortest (height at day 93; Table 1).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (a) Growth curves (mean ± 1 SE) measured as plant height for the three species during the first 30 d after planting, (b) growth curves measured as plant height for the entire season, and (c) growth curves measured as leaf number along the main stem

 
Helianthus annuus produced more leaves along the main stem than the other two species (Table 1, Fig. 3c). This is in accordance with the overall faster growth rates of H. annuus. However, H. petiolaris produced a terminal inflorescence earlier and grew more side branches with additional heads than H. annuus (Table 1), however, all three species show the same overall branching pattern.

Helianthus anomalus was positively transgressive for water content per leaf area, indicating more succulent leaves (Table 1).

Almost all individuals produced a taproot, but the extent of lateral roots did vary, with H. anomalus producing the fewest and shortest lateral roots, and H. annuus displaying a well-developed and extended lateral root system. H. petiolaris was very similar to H. annuus, but differed by overall volume of soil explored by roots (Table 1).

Ecophysiological characters
We compared H. annuus, H. petiolaris and the hybrid species H. anomalus for 12 ecophysiological characters: eight during well-watered conditions, and four during short-term drought. There were significant species differences for eight of the ecophysiological characters (Table 2). Helianthus anomalus was H. petiolaris-like for five characters (41.7% of all ecophysiological characters) and three characters (25.0%) were positively transgressive.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Ecophysiological trait expression in H. annuus, H. petiolaris, and H. anomalus (mean ± 1 SE)1

 
Under well-watered conditions, there were no species differences for leaf A, gs, nitrogen content, and PNUE (Table 2). Instantaneous WUE (from instantaneous ci) was positively transgressive for H. anomalus and leaf-lifetime integrated WUE (from {delta}13C) was H. petiolaris-like. The differences between air and leaf temperature (leaf < air) and cuticular conductance were also positively transgressive for H. anomalus (Table 2). When plants were subjected to a short-term drought and reached leaf wilting point, the H. anomalus characters of A, gs, ci, and leaf water potential were all H. petiolaris-like (Table 2).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Morphological and ecophysiological character expression
As alluded to in the introduction to this paper, there are several possible explanations for the ability of a hybrid species to colonize a habitat different from that preferred by either parental species. These include the possibility that (1) the new habitat is intermediate between that of the parental species in terms of critical morphological and ecophysiological parameters and thus favorable to intermediate hybrids, (2) that hybridization has created new combinations of parental traits and/or (3) extreme phenotypes that facilitate adaptation to novel or extreme habitats, or (4) that habitat divergence has evolved gradually via the fixation of favorable mutations. Therefore, one major question to be answered by this paper was whether morphological and ecophysiological traits displayed by the hybrid species H. anomalus are intermediate, parental-like, or extreme when compared to its parents. The answer is clear. Helianthus anomalus is a mosaic of parental-like and transgressive phenotypes, of which a considerable proportion is transgressive. However, our data cannot discriminate between hybridization and mutational divergence as explanations for the origin of the extreme traits.

The proportion of transgressive traits reported for H. anomalus (~38% for morphological and ecophysiological traits combined) is considerably higher than the average reported for nine hybrid species (16%) in a recent review of morphological character expression in hybrids (Rieseberg and Ellstrand, 1993 ). Likewise, a higher proportion of characters in H. anomalus are parental-like (~60%) than that generally reported for hybrid species (48.7%). In contrast, most other hybrid species express a larger proportion of intermediate phenotypes (35.3%) than reported here for H. anomalus (~2%). One possible reason for this difference is that many of the "hybrid species" included in the Rieseberg and Ellstrand (1993) review were experimentally synthesized; perhaps natural selection is most likely to favor the establishment of only the most divergent hybrid phenotypes. Clearly, more data for naturally occurring hybrid species will be needed to decide whether this is a general outcome of hybrid speciation.

One interesting aspect of our study concerns the fact that more morphological/ecophysiological characters are H. petiolaris-like and likewise most transgressive characters exceed the values for H. petiolaris and not H. annuus. This is even more remarkable since the genetic composition of the hybrid species does not differ significantly from a ~1:1 ratio of H. petiolaris and H. annuus genetic material (Ungerer et al., 1998 ). Possibly, ecological selection has driven H. anomalus in the direction of H. petiolaris with respect to morphological and ecophysiological traits (H. anomalus is most similar to H. petiolaris with respect to habitat preference), whereas fertility selection may have favored genetic material from H. annuus (Rieseberg et al., 1996 ).

Ecological interpretation of traits
A second major question is whether the transgressive characters as well as the new parental-like character combinations displayed by H. anomalus can be considered adaptations to sand dune habitats. Below we provide arguments in favor of adaptive function for many of these characters or character combinations, fully realizing that in the absence of comparative fitness data for different habitat/trait combinations these arguments are speculative. Nonetheless, by using the available literature on sand dune adaptation to interpret the morphological and ecophysiological characteristics of H. anomalus, we believe that some valuable, albeit preliminary, conclusions can be made.

Morphological traits
Helianthus anomalus is most similar to H. petiolaris in terms of leaf characters (Table 1). However, H. anomalus leaves have a tendency toward succulence and store much more water per leaf area than both parental species (Table 1). Increased leaf thickness previously has been associated with an increased vigor of buried plant parts in a dune grass species (Yuan, Maun, and Hopkins, 1993 ). Helianthus anomalus often can be found partially buried in its natural habitat. The succulent leaves might be able to better withstand sand abrasions as was shown for the grass species, although this remains to be tested. Helianthus anomalus also maintains a larger temperature difference between air and leaf than its parents. Thus it appears to be able to more effectively keep its leaves cool, possibly avoiding the high sand and air temperatures characteristic of sand dunes (Hegazy and El Amry, 1998 ).

The hybrid species has some of the largest achenes of all wild annual sunflower species (Heiser et al., 1969 ) and large size correlated with large internal nutrient storage can facilitate rapid early root growth (Wulff, 1986 ; Chen and Maun, 1999 ) and the tapping of water reservoirs. Dittmer (1959) comparatively studied the root system of 13 sand dune plants and found that most have dominant taproots and few lateral roots. Our crude root data indicate that H. anomalus had fewer lateral roots (measured as volume of soil explored by roots) than its parents, but differences in taproot length were not significant (Table 1). However, in wild populations H. anomalus does tend to have a more well-developed taproot and fewer lateral roots than the parental species (Schwarzbach, personal observation).

In regard to dispersal strategies dune plants behave largely like island endemics and often exhibit adaptations that reduce the possibility of long-distance dispersal. The relatively high rate of endemism on active dunes suggests that dune endemics are likely to be propagated by dispersal units that are not easily blown off the dunes, but remain in the habitat to which they are best adapted (Bowers, 1982 ; Keddy and Keddy, 1984 ). The dispersal units typically are relatively large and heavy (Bowers, 1996 ) and often have a shape that allows them to roll on the sand or be dragged by the wind over small distances (Danin, 1991 ). Consistent with these predictions, H. anomalus has heavy seeds that are nearly cylindrical in shape with an almost round cross section, which may allow them to roll on the sand. In contrast, both parents have flattened achenes (achene shape; Table 1). This adaptive interpretation of seed size and shape is also supported by the fact that the only other annual Helianthus species on dunes, H. niveus subsp. tephrodes (Fig. 2), has achenes that approach those of H. anomalus in size and shape (Heiser et al., 1969 ). This observation led Heiser et al. (1969) to suggest that these two taxa might be closely related. However, phylogenetic work (Fig. 2) did not support this hypothesis, and the similarities are more parsimoniously interpreted as resulting from parallel evolution.

Ecophysiological traits
All three southwestern annual sunflower species examined in this study share characteristics common to many annual species in arid environments: high photosynthetic rates, relatively high stomatal conductances, and adaptations for optimal regulation of their energy budget (Toft and Pearcy, 1982 ; Gibson, 1998 ). Although H. anomalus has often been described as a xerically adapted species that might exceed the drought tolerance performance of its parents (e.g., Thompson, Zimmerman, and Rogers, 1981 ), this description presents two challenges. First, tolerance to drought is a complex trait, making it difficult to decipher which traits may be contributing to greater avoidance or tolerance of water stress (Blum, 1996 ). Second, water limitation may not be the major limiting factor for sand dune habitats where H. anomalus is found. We will discuss each of these factors in turn.

Plant traits involved in adaptation to water limitations can be related to either drought avoidance or drought tolerance at less negative or more negative water potentials (Blum, 1996 ; Nilsen and Orcutt, 1996; Gibson, 1998 ). Given the available data on Helianthus (wild and cultivated) and other desert and sand dune annuals, it is likely that greater drought tolerance of H. anomalus would fall into the category of drought tolerance at less negative water potentials and involve traits that reduce water loss or enhance water accumulation (Pavlik, 1980 ; Sobrado and Turner, 1983a, c, 1986 ; Gibson, 1998 ; Garciá-Mora, Gallego-Fernandez, and Garciá-Novo, 1999 ). One trait related to water loss is WUE (photosynthetic carbon gain per unit transpirational water loss), which is under strong genetic control (Guy, Warne, and Reid, 1989 ; Martin et al., 1989 ; Donovan and Ehleringer, 1994 ; Handley et al., 1997 ). Plants adapted to prolonged water limitations generally have a higher or more conservative WUE (Nilsen and Orcutt, 1996; Gibson, 1998 ). Estimating WUE at two different time scales, the species ranked as H. anomalus < H. petiolaris = H annuus for instantaneous WUE, and H. anomalus = H. petiolaris < H. annuus for leaf-lifetime integrated WUE. Thus, under well-watered conditions, H. anomalus has a less conservative water-use strategy that is inconsistent with greater tolerance of prolonged water limitation.

Low leaf cuticular conductance is also thought to be an adaptation to more xeric habitats because it minimizes water loss through the cuticle when stomata are closed (Quisenberry, Roark, and McMichael, 1982 ; Hamerlynck and Knapp, 1996 ). However, H. anomalus had a cuticular conductance much higher than that of either parental species (Table 2).

The ability to close stomata and conserve water in response to declining leaf water potentials may prolong survival through short-term drought episodes (Pezeshki and Chambers, 1986 ; Sparks and Black, 1999 ). When exposed to severe short-term water limitation, as indicated by reaching wilting point, H. anomalus and H. petiolaris closed their stomata to a much greater extent than H. annuus (Table 2), potentially indicating a greater ability to tolerate short-term water deficits likely associated with sandy habitats. However, H. anomalus did not exceed H. petiolaris in this capacity. Thus, the water loss characters examined to date fail to support the suggestion that H. anomalus is more drought tolerant than its parental species.

Although xeric in appearance, dune habitats may not be more xeric than the habitats of the parental species as has been suggested previously. Water is usually not the limiting factor for growth in dunes if the plants can manage to tap belowground water resources. The ecological literature suggests that the primary environmental factors limiting plant growth and existence on dunes are moving sand and low nutrient levels (Pemadasa and Lovell, 1975 ; Pavlik, 1980 ; Bowers, 1982 ; Moreno-Casasola, 1986 ; Danin, 1991 ; Maun, 1998 ). This is a paradoxical situation since the fast growth would be advantageous for outgrowing the disturbance of sand burial, whereas slow growth is more often advantageous in nutrient-limited habitats (Grime, 1977 ; Chapin, 1991; Chapin, Autumn, and Pugnaire, 1993). We found that under well-watered high-nutrient conditions, H. anomalus grew more slowly and was shorter than the parental species (Fig. 3) even though it did not differ from its parents for A, gs, PNUE, and leaf nitrogen content (Table 2). These growth data are consistent with the average field heights of these species, H. annuus > H. petiolaris > H. anomalus (Heiser et al., 1969 ; Thompson, Zimmerman, and Rogers, 1981 ). We are currently exploring the hypothesis that the inherently slower growth rate of H. anomalus is associated with greater ability to tolerate low-nutrient conditions (Grime, 1977 ; Chapin, 1991; Chapin, Autumn, and Pugnaire, 1993).

Conclusions
We were able to identify many characters that were transgressive for H. anomalus and that may have allowed this hybrid species to quickly adapt to its new and unique habitat. Surprisingly, the bulk of these differences were found for morphological characters rather than ecophysiological characters. However, measurements in the natural habitat of these taxa are required to verify our greenhouse results. For example, soil nutrient composition and carbon isotope ratios for wild populations are currently under study. Additionally, a greenhouse experiment that includes stress factors other than water stress will be conducted in the near future.

Furthermore, we found that a larger number of parental-like and transgressive characters are petiolaris-like or are exceeding values for petiolaris, although the genomic composition for H. anomalus does not significantly differ from a 1:1 ratio of H. annuus and H. petiolaris genome parts (Ungerer et al., 1998 ). As described above, we believe that the selection for morphological and ecophysiological characters is possibly largely driven by ecological habitat requirements, whereas genomic composition is a result of a combination of ecological and fertility selection.

We are currently mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for a large number of the ecophysiological and morphological traits that were included in this comparative study and hope to get some insights about the genetic bases of transgressive characters in this species. We also plan to examine experimental hybrids between H. annuus and H. petiolaris to determine whether they exhibit transgression for the same traits that are transgressive in H. anomalus. This comparison will allow us to distinguish between the possibility that some differences between the hybrid and its parents stem from selection acting on variation generated by transgressive segregation vs. variation generated by mutation since the origin of H. anomalus. Additionally, these artificial hybrids will be raised in the natural habitat of H. anomalus to determine the selective value of individual QTLs and transgressive genotypes. Then the genomic composition of the most fit artificial hybrid could be compared with the natural hybrid, and we shall determine whether the most transgressive phenotypes for a specific trait provide the greatest selective advantage. Although we are currently not able to predict the outcome of these projected studies, the experiments mentioned do represent an important step toward understanding the possible role of transgressive segregation in adaptation and speciation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank Michele Arntz, Diana Wolf, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript; Andy Tull and Mark Zimmerman for excellent plant care; and Meredith Phillips for help with the measurements. This work was supported by NSF grant DEB-9806290. Back

3 Author for correspondence (aschwarz{at}bio.indiana.edu ). Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Abbott, R. J. 1992 Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 401–404[CrossRef]

Arnold, M. L. 1997 Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

Blum, A. 1996 Crop responses to drought and the interpretation to adaptation. Plant Growth Regime 20: 135–148

Bowers, J. E. 1982 The plant ecology of inland dunes in western North America. Journal of Arid Environment 5: 199–220

———. 1996 Seedling emergence on Sonoran desert dunes. Journal of Arid Environments 33: 63–72[CrossRef][ISI]

Buerkle, C. A., R. J. Morris, M. A. Asmussen, and L. H. Rieseberg. In press The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity.

Chapin III, F. S. 1991 Integrated responses of plants to stress. BioScience 41: 29–37

———, K. Autumn, and F. Pugnaire. 1993 Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. American Naturalist 142: S78–S92[CrossRef][ISI]

Chen, H., and M. A. Maun. 1999 Effects of sand burial depth on seed germination and seedling emergence of Cirsium pitcheri. Plant Ecology 140: 53–60

Danin, A. 1991 Plant adaptations in desert dunes. Journal of Arid Environments 21: 193–212

Dittmer, H. J. 1959 A study of the roots systems of certain sand dune plants in New Mexico. Ecology 40: 265–273[CrossRef][ISI]

Donovan, L. A., and J. R. Ehleringer. 1994 Potential for selection on plants for water-use efficiency as estimated by carbon isotope discrimination. American Journal of Botany 81: 927–935[CrossRef][ISI]

Ehleringer, J. R., S. L. Phillips, and J. P. Comstock. 1992 Seasonal variation in the carbon isotopic composition of desert plants. Functional Ecology 6: 396–404[CrossRef][ISI]

Farquhar, G. D., J. R. Ehleringer, and K. T. Hubick. 1989 Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 9: 121–137

Field, C., J. Merino, and H. A. Mooney. 1983 Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens. Oecologia 60: 384–389[CrossRef][ISI]

———, and H. A. Mooney. 1986 The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In T. J. Givnish [ed.], On the economy of plant form and function, 25–56. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA

Garciá-Mora, M. R., J. B. Gallego-Fernandez, and F. Garciá-Novo. 1999 Plant functional types in coastal foredunes in relation to environmental stress and disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 27–34

Gibson, A. C. 1998 Photosynthetic organs of desert plants. BioScience 48: 911–920[CrossRef][ISI]

Grant, V. 1981 Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Grime, J. P. 1977 Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Midwest Naturalist 111: 1169–1194

Guy, R. D., P. G. Warne, and D. M. Reid. 1989 Stable carbon isotopes ratio as an index of water-use efficiency in C3 halophytes-possible relationships to strategies for osmotic adjustment. In P. W. Rundel, J. R. Ehleringer, and K. A. Nagy [eds.], Stable isotopes in ecological research, 55–75. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA

Hamerlynck, E. P., and A. K. Knapp. 1996 Early season cuticular conductance and gas exchange in two oaks near the western edge of their range. Trees 10: 403–409

Handley, L. L., D. Robinson, C. M. Scrimgeour, D. Gordon, B. P. Forster, R. P. Ellis, and E. Nevo. 1997 Correlation molecular markers with physiological expression in Hordeum, a developing approach using stable isotopes. New Phytologist 137: 159–163[CrossRef][ISI]

Hegazy, A. K., and M. I. El Amry. 1998 Leaf temperature of desert sand dune plants: perspectives on the adaptability of leaf morphology. African Journal of Ecology 36: 34–43

Heiser, C. B. 1947 Hybridization between the sunflower species Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris. Evolution 1: 249–262

———. 1954 Variation and subspeciation in the common sunflowers. American Midland Naturalist 51: 287–305[CrossRef][ISI]

———. 1958 Three new annual sunflowers (Helianthus) from the southwestern United States. Rhodora 60: 272–283

———. 1961 Morphological and cytological variation in Helianthus petiolaris with notes on related species. Evolution 15: 247–258[CrossRef][ISI]

———. 1978 Taxonomy of Helianthus and origin of domesticated sunflower. In J. F. Carter [ed.], Sunflower science and technology, 31–53. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

———, D. M. Smith, S. B. Clevenger, and W. C. Martin. 1969 The North American sunflowers (Helianthus). Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 22: 1–218

Keddy, C. J., and P. A. Keddy. 1984 Reproductive biology and habitat of Cirsium pitcheri. Michigan Botanist 23: 57–67

Lewontin, R. C., and L. C. Birch. 1966 Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20: 315–336[CrossRef][ISI]

Martin, B., J. Nienhuis, G. King, and A. Schaefer. 1989 Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water-use efficiency in tomato. Science 243: 1725–1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maun, M. A. 1998 Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 713–738[CrossRef]

McCarthy, E. M., M. A. Asmussen, and W. W. Anderson. 1995 A theoretical assessment of recombinational speciation. Heredity 74: 502–509[ISI]

Moreno-Casasola, P. 1986 Sand movement as a factor in the distribution of plant communities in a coastal dune system. Vegetatio 65: 67–76[CrossRef][ISI]

Nabhan, G. P., and K. L. Reichhardt. 1983 Hopi protection of Helianthus anomalus, a rare sunflower. Southwestern Naturalist 28: 231–235[CrossRef][ISI]

Nilsen, E. T., and D. M. Orcutt. 1996 The physiology of plants under stress. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA

Pavlik, B. M. 1980 Patterns of water potential and photosynthesis of desert sand dune plants, Eureka Valley, California. Oecologia 46: 147–154[CrossRef][ISI]

Pemadasa, M. A., and P. H. Lovell. 1975 Factors controlling germination of some dune annuals. Journal of Ecology 63: 41–59[CrossRef][ISI]

Pezeshki, S. R., and J. L. Chambers. 1986 Stomatal and photosynthetic response of drought-stressed cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodaefolia) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 841–846

Quisenberry, J. E., B. Roark, and B. L. McMichael. 1982 Use of transpiration decline curves to identify drought-tolerant cotton germplasm. Crop Science 22: 918–922[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rice, W. R. 1989 Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225[CrossRef][ISI]

Rieseberg, L. H. 1991 Homoploid reticulate evolution in Helianthus (Asteraceae): evidence from ribosomal genes. American Journal of Botany 78: 1218–1237[CrossRef][ISI]

———. 1997 Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 28: 359–389[CrossRef]

———, M. A. Archer, and R. K. Wayne. 1999 Transgressive segregation, adaptation, and speciation. Heredity 83: 363–372

———, S. M. Beckstrom-Sternberg, A. Liston, and D. M. Arias. 1991 Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from chloroplast DNA and isozyme variation in Helianthus sect. Helianthus (Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 16: 50–76

———, R. Carter, and S. Zona. 1990 Molecular tests of the hypothesized origin of two diploid Helianthus species (Asteraceae). Evolution 44: 1498–1511[CrossRef][ISI]

———, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1993 What can morphological and molecular marker tell us about plant hybridization? Critical Reviews in Plant Science 12: 213–214[CrossRef]

———, and G. J. Seiler. 1990 Molecular evidence and the origin and development of the domesticated sunflower (Helianthus annuus, Asteraceae). Economic Botany 44: 79–91[ISI]

———, B. Sinervo, C. R. Linder, M. C. Ungerer, and D. M. Arias. 1996 Role of gene interaction in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272: 741–745[Abstract]

Rogers, C. E., T. E. Thompson, and G. J. Seiler 1982 Sunflower species of the United States. National Sunflower Association, Bismarck, North Dakota, USA

Schilling, E. E., and C. B. Heiser. 1981 Infrageneric classification of Helianthus (Compositae). Taxon 30: 393–403

Schluter, D. 1998 Ecological causes of speciation. In D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher [eds.], Endless forms—species and speciation, 114–129. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA

Sobrado, M. A., and N. C. Turner. 1983a A comparison of the water relations characteristics of Helianthus annuus and Helianthus petiolaris when subjected to water deficits. Oecologia 58: 309–313[CrossRef][ISI]

———, and ———. 1983b Influence of water deficits on the water relations characteristics and productivity of wild and cultivated sunflowers. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 10: 195–203

———, and ———. 1986 Photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and distribution in the wild sunflower Helianthus petiolaris and the cultivated Helianthus annuus as influenced by water deficit. Oecologia 69: 181–187[CrossRef][ISI]

Sparks, J. D., and R. A. Black. 1999 Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa: the role of stomatal control in preventing cavitation. Tree Physiology 19: 453–459[ISI]

Templeton, A. R. 1981 Mechanisms of speciation—a population genetic approach. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 12: 23–48

Thompson, T. E., D. C. Zimmerman, and C. E. Rogers. 1981 Wild Helianthus as a genetic resource. Field Crops Research 4: 333–343[CrossRef][ISI]

Toft, N. L., and R. W. Pearcy. 1982 Gas exchange characteristics and temperature relations of two desert annuals: a comparison of a winter-active and summer-active species. Oecologia 55: 170–177[CrossRef][ISI]

Ungerer, M. C., S. Baird, J. Pan, and L. H. Rieseberg. 1998 Rapid hybrid speciation in wild sunflowers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 11757–11762[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wulff, R. D. 1986 Seed size variation in Desmodium paniculatum II. Effects on seedling growth and physiological performance. Journal of Ecology 74: 99–114[CrossRef][ISI]

Yuan, T., M. A. Maun, and W. G. Hopkins. 1993 Effects on sand accretion on photosynthesis, leaf-water potential and morphology of two dune grasses. Functional Ecology 7: 676–682[CrossRef][ISI]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. A. Wu and D. R. Campbell
Leaf physiology reflects environmental differences and cytoplasmic background in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrids
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1804 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Lihova, J. Kucera, M. Perny, and K. Marhold
Hybridization between Two Polyploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) Species in North-western Spain: Discordance Between Morphological and Genetic Variation Patterns
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2007; 99(6): 1083 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
L. C. Brouillette, D. M. Rosenthal, L. H. Rieseberg, C. Lexer, R. L. Malmberg, and L. A. Donovan
Genetic Architecture of Leaf Ecophysiological Traits in Helianthus
J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 142 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. A. Church and D. R. Taylor
Speciation and hybridization among Houstonia (Rubiaceae) species: the influence of polyploidy on reticulate evolution
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2005; 92(8): 1372 - 1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. B. Langlade, X. Feng, T. Dransfield, L. Copsey, A. I. Hanna, C. Thebaud, A. Bangham, A. Hudson, and E. Coen
Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space
PNAS, July 19, 2005; 102(29): 10221 - 10226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
B. L. Gross and L. H. Rieseberg
The Ecological Genetics of Homoploid Hybrid Speciation
J. Hered., May 1, 2005; 96(3): 241 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. E. Welch and L. H. Rieseberg
Habitat divergence between a homoploid hybrid sunflower species, Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae), and its progenitors
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2002; 89(3): 472 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzbach, A. E.
Right arrow