Am. J. Bot. Join the BSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, D. D.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:583-587.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.

Comparative evaluation of vessel elements in S alix spp. (Salicaceae) endemic to the Athabasca sand dunes of northern Saskatchewan, Canada1

Ranessa L. Cooper2 and David D. Cass

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9

Received for publication December 21, 1999. Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Vessel element (VE) characters, including density, lumen diameter, length, and clustering, were evaluated using light and scanning electron microscopy in four endemic Salix taxa from the Lake Athabasca sand dunes in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. These data were compared with the widespread putative sister species for each endemic. Endemic taxa exhibited similar VE densities as compared to their associated sister species. Salix brachycarpa var. brachycarpa and its derived endemic, var. psammophila, had the highest VE density values of all endemic–progenitor pairs in this study. Values for VE lumen diameter and VE length were significantly different in some of the species pairs. Lumen diameter of the endemic S. planifolia ssp. tyrrelli was significantly less than that of its widespread sister species, ssp. planifolia. Salix turnorii had significantly greater values for both VE lumen diameter and length than its progenitor, S. lutea. Vessel element clustering did not differ significantly between endemic and progenitor taxa with the exception of S. silicicola and its arctic progenitor, S. alaxensis. Structural differences for these endemic willows appear related to their open sand habitat, and taxonomic implications for endemic–progenitor pairs are discussed.

Key Words: Lake Athabasca • Salix • sand dune • vessel element • willow • wood anatomy


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The Athabasca sand dunes are located on the south shore of Lake Athabasca in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada (Fig. 1). These are the largest northern dune systems in the world and were formed after deglaciation ~10 000 yr ago (Raup and Argus, 1982 ). Lake Athabasca's south shore has been an interesting study site for sand dune formation (Hermesh, 1972 ), dune terrain and potential land usage (Smith, 1978 ), and detailed descriptions are available for both land and vegetation (Raup and Argus, 1982 ). Although over 200 plant taxa occupy this boreal sand dune region (Hermesh, 1972 ), only 40 of these occur on the open sands (Hermesh, 1972 ; Smith, 1978 ; Raup and Argus, 1982 ). Ten endemic taxa were first described by Raup (1936) , of which four are Salix species.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the Lake Athabasca sand dunes in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Dunes are noted with cross-hatch shading. (Map courtesy of Brett Purdy.)

 
Several studies have examined the origin and evolution of genetic variation within these endemics (Purdy, Bayer, and Macdonald, 1994 ; Purdy and Bayer, 1995a, b, 1996 ). Only one study has critically evaluated the taxonomic relationship of Salix planifolia Pursh ssp. tyrrellii (Raup) Argus and its progenitor, S. planifolia Pursh ssp. planifolia, from the Athabasca sand dunes (Argus and Steele, 1979 ). Purdy and Bayer (1995a) examined allozyme variation in the endemic S. silicicola Raup and its widespread arctic progenitor, S. alaxensis (Anderss.) Coville. Morphological similarities shared within endemic–progenitor pairs indicate close taxonomic associations (Argus and Steele, 1979 ).

There have been no detailed structural investigations of Lake Athabasca's endemic willows. Structural information may provide insight into functional strategies of these endemic sand dune species. The habitat of the Athabasca sand dunes can be described as desert-like, with endemic willows occurring on large expanses of open, actively blowing sand. Dune slacks are critical areas for establishment of endemic willows (Raup and Argus, 1982 ). If a willow seedling survives sand accretion, it eventually becomes a woody shrub on the open sands. Endemic willows are rooted in the water table, which may be several metres below the sand surface (G. Argus, personal communication). Overall, the open sand habitat can be described as xerophytic, although these endemic shrubs have access to water from the water table and precipitation. Weather data extrapolated from Uranium City, Saskatchewan indicate that the Athabasca sand dune region receives ~36–40 cm of precipitation annually, of which ~12.5 cm is rain during the growing season (Raup and Argus, 1982 ).

Endemic willows (S. brachycarpa Nutt. var. psammophila Raup, S. planifolia ssp. tyrrellii, S. silicicola, and S. turnorii Raup) are confined to open sand areas on the dune interiors. However, S. planifolia ssp. tyrrellii is also found along the shoreline of Lake Athabasca, occurring sympatrically with its putative sister species, S. planifolia Pursh ssp. planifolia. Thomson Bay is a site on Lake Athabasca's shoreline where these two willows co-occur, and collections were taken from this site, while other endemics were collected from the Yakow Lake dune (see Fig. 1). The progenitor taxa are thought to be S. brachycarpa Nutt. var. brachycarpa, S. planifolia ssp. planifolia, S. alaxensis, and S. lutea Nutt., respectively.

The primary objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively vessel element (VE) characters in endemic willows, (2) to compare VE structure in endemic willows with that of their associated boreal or arctic progenitors, (3) to relate VE structural information in endemic willows to functional significance in this northern, open sand habitat, and (4) to address taxonomic implications of structural data in each endemic–progenitor pair.

This study is the first extensive investigation of internal structure of the Lake Athabasca sand dune endemic willows as compared with their closely related boreal or arctic putative sister species. The evaluation of adaptive VE characters in endemic willows will lead to a greater understanding of the role they play in survival in a northern, open sand habitat. The open sand habitat may be more suited to specialization in water conduction than the habitats occupied by progenitors. In particular, we chose to examine VE characters correlated with water conduction (Carlquist, 1988 ). The Lake Athabasca sand dune habitat provides a unique opportunity to investigate structural adaptation in recently derived plant taxa.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Stem cuttings from endemic willows and one sympatric progenitor were collected from the Lake Athabasca sand dunes in Saskatchewan, Canada, while stem cuttings for widespread progenitor taxa were collected from riparian and peatland sites in central and southern Alberta. Twenty-five to 35 stem cuttings were collected for each species. Stems ranged from 1 to 10 yr in age, but endemic cuttings were primarily 1–3 yr old.

Ten or more stems from each species were softened in boiling water. Cross-sectional and radial-longitudinal sections were made using fresh razor blades. Sections were air-dried, coated with gold-palladium, and observed using a JEOL JSM-6301FXV scanning electron microscope.

Stems were also prepared for light microscopy (LM). After boiling, at least five stems per taxon were cut in cross section and stored in 70% ethanol. Sections (15–24 µm in thickness) were prepared using a sliding microtome, mounted on glass slides, and stained with Safranin O/Light Green using a protocol modified from Johansen (1940) .

General observations of VE characters were made. Fields of view (at 300x magnification) were examined from at least ten stems of each species. One to three fields of view (per stem) from electron micrographs were used to obtain quantitative VE data, as well as qualitative observations. Values for VE density (number of VE/mm2) and VE clustering (number of VE/group) were obtained from electron micrographs.

For measuring VE lumen diameter and VE length, LM was employed. Vessel element lumen diameter data were obtained from cross sections. Lumen diameter values were determined from early wood vessels in the most recent growth increment in at least five stems from each willow species. Measurements were taken at the widest region of the lumen.

Jeffrey's method (Johansen, 1940 ) for wood macerations was used to obtain VE length measurements. Five stems from each taxon were macerated, and at least 25 vessel elements were measured per stem. Macerations were viewed using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy.

Statistical t tests and ANOVA were used to analyze quantitative VE data in endemic–progenitor pairs.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
General observations
All willows examined in this study are diffuse-porous. Vessel elements (VEs) have simple perforations on both end walls, and some VEs have narrow tails on their end walls while others are blunt. Vessel elements from all species exhibit primarily alternate intervascular pitting patterns. Some transitional and scalariform lateral wall pittings were observed. Vessel element density, VE lumen diameter, VE length, and VE clustering were evaluated within each endemic–progenitor pair, and these data are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Vessel element (VE) characters (mean ± 1 SD) for Lake Athabasca sand dune endemic Salix spp. and their putative sister taxa. Statistical comparisons were made within each endemic–progenitor pair

 
Vessel element density
Vessel element density values vary both within endemic–progenitors pairs and among pairs. However, no significant differences were detected within any of the endemic–progenitor pairs. Salix brachycarpa var. brachycarpa and the derived endemic var. psammophila had the highest density values of all willows examined (Figs. 2–3). Salix silicicola and S. turnorii had smaller VE density values compared with their respective widespread sister species. Salix planifolia ssp. tyrrellii also had a VE density value less than that of its progenitor, ssp. planifolia. However, the sympatric ssp. planifolia from Thomson Bay had more VEs/mm2 than the widespread allopatric ssp. planifolia.



View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 2–14. Scanning electron and light micrographs of vessel element (VE) characters in Salix spp. Figs. 2–3 . Scanning electron micrographs of stem cross sections depicting VE density. 2. S. brachycarpa var. brachycarpa. 3. S. brachycarpa var. psammophila. Figs. 4–8 . Light micrographs of stem cross sections comparing VE lumen diameter of early wood vessels in the most recent growth increment. 4. S. planifolia ssp. planifolia. 5. S. planifolia ssp. planifolia from Thomson Bay dune shore. 6. S. planifolia ssp. tyrrellii. 7. S. lutea. 8. S. turnorii. Figs. 9–10 . Light micrographs of stem cross sections comparing VE clustering. 9. S. alaxensis. 10. S. silicicola. Figs. 11–14 . Light micrographs of wood macerations using DIC to compare VE length. 11. S. brachycarpa var. brachycarpa. 12. S. brachycarpa var. psammophila. 13. S. lutea. 14. S. turnorii. Bars = 100 µm

 
Vessel element lumen diameter
Vessel element lumen diameter varied among endemic–progenitor pairs, and in some cases, significant differences were noted between an endemic and its putative sister species. Salix brachycarpa var. psammophila and its progenitor had the smallest VE lumen diameters (Table 1).

Lumen diameters for S. planifolia ssp. planifolia were significantly greater than the endemic ssp. tyrrellii, but there was no significant difference in lumen diameter between the endemic ssp. tyrrellii and the sympatric ssp. planifolia from Thomson Bay. In addition, the widespread ssp. planifolia was significantly greater in VE lumen diameter than the Thomson Bay ssp. planifolia (Figs. 4–6).

Salix alaxensis had greater VE lumen diameters than that of the derived endemic, S. silicicola, although this was not statistically significant. Lumen diameter, however, for VEs of S. lutea was significantly less than that of the closely related endemic, S. turnorii (Figs. 7, 8).

Vessel element clustering
Vessel element clustering varied among all willow taxa in this study. The S. brachycarpa endemic–progenitor pair had similar clustering values, although the endemic var. psammophila had more VEs per group than its associated putative sister species, var. brachycarpa.

The number of VEs per group was greater in the endemic, S. planifolia ssp. tyrrellii, than in the sympatric ssp. planifolia. Clustering values for the endemic ssp. tyrrellii and the sympatric progenitor ssp. planifolia were greater than that of the widespread ssp. planifolia, but no statistical significance was detected.

A significant statistical difference was observed between S. alaxensis and its derived endemic, S. silicicola, as the progenitor had a greater VE clustering value than the endemic (Figs. 9, 10). Salix lutea had a smaller VE clustering value than the endemic S. turnorii, but this difference was not statistically significant.

Vessel element length
Vessel element length varied within endemic–progenitor pairs, and some of these differences were significant. Salix brachycarpa var. brachycarpa had an average VE length value that was significantly less than that of the endemic var. psammophila (Figs. 11, 12). In the S. planifolia endemic–progenitor group, both the endemic ssp. tyrrellii and the widespread ssp. planifolia had similar values for VE length. The sympatric progenitor S. planifolia ssp. planifolia from Thomson Bay had the smallest average VE length. No significant difference was observed between the VE length values of S. silicicola and its progenitor, but the average value was greater in S. silicicola. Average VE length for the progenitor S. lutea was significantly less than that of its derived endemic, S. turnorii (Figs. 13, 14).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This study is the first to address internal anatomy of the Lake Athabasca sand dune endemic willows, as vessel elements (VEs) were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively for each species. Endemic willows occur primarily in open sand areas of dune interiors. The desert-like property of this habitat is also characterized by high light intensity and actively blowing sand. Although one might presume this to be a xerophytic environment, the endemic willows are rooted in the water table. Thus, access to available water allows for a more mesic situation for these endemics. We chose to evaluate VEs to see whether VE characters were more correlated with a xerophytic or mesic environment. Quantitative data for VE density, lumen diameter, clustering, and length in all four endemic willows were compared to that of the associated boreal or arctic putative progenitors. Density values varied within endemic–progenitor pairs, as well as among them. Statistical analysis revealed some significant differences within endemic–progenitor pairs for VE lumen diameter, VE clustering, and VE length (Table 1). We interpret these significant differences as being linked with habitat or growth habit. Although statistical manipulations did not show more variation within endemic–progenitor pairs, differences were noted and are discussed below. The minor degrees of variation in VE characters examined reflect the taxonomic affinity of the progenitor willows and their associated derived endemics.

Correlations with habitat
In mesic habitats, tension is lower in conductive systems, so VEs tend to be longer and wider; in xeric environments, VEs are generally shorter and narrower (Carlquist, 1975 ). In our study, results do not reveal distinct trends when comparing VEs from endemic willows with those of the respective boreal or arctic putative progenitor. Overall, endemics had longer VEs than their progenitors, with the exception of the allopatric widespread S. planifolia ssp. planifolia. The widespread progenitor ssp. planifolia had a similar VE length value compared to the endemic ssp. tyrrellii. Based solely on VE length data, the belowground environment of the open sands may be considered mesic as willows are rooted in the water table.

Endemics appear to have greater VE clustering than the progenitors, with the exception of Salix silicicola. This endemic had significantly fewer VEs per group than its widespread progenitor, S. alaxensis. As many of the progenitors were collected from peatlands and riparian sites, the significant difference in VE length between S. silicicola and S. alaxensis may be due to growth habit rather than habitat. Salix alaxensis has a rather prostrate growth form (at its collection site by a stream), while the habit of S. silicicola is upright.

Studies have shown that VE diameter can decrease due to water stress (Vitis; Lovisolo and Schubert, 1998 ), as well as low-watering and low-nutrient regimes (Cereus; Arnold and Mauseth, 1999 ). The sandy substrate does not hold a lot of water; the only standing water on the open sands is that of the exposed water table. Thus, one might expect the endemic willows to have narrower vessels than their putative progenitors due to this sandy substrate, which is also low in nutrients (S. E. Macdonald, personal communication, University of Alberta). This hypothesis can be supported by data from two of the four Lake Athabasca endemic willows. Both Salix planifolia ssp. tyrrellii and S. silicicola had narrower VE lumen diameters than their widespread sister species. In contrast, the endemic S. brachycarpa var. psammophila had a greater average VE lumen diameter than its sister taxon, but no statistical significance was detected. Salix turnorii had a significantly greater VE lumen diameter than its progenitor, S. lutea. For the endemic S. turnorii, a wider lumen may be a structural adaptation to the open sand environment.

Three endemic willows had VE densities less than that of their associated sister species; however, none of these differences was statistically significant. The only endemic to have a greater VE density than its progenitor was Salix brachycarpa var. psammophila, but the density values were quite similar for each.

Interestingly, the sympatric progenitor from Thomson Bay, S. planifolia ssp. planifolia, had a greater VE density than both the endemic ssp. tyrrellii and the allopatric widespread ssp. planifolia. The sympatric ssp. planifolia also had the smallest VE length of the three subspecies. During collection of the sympatric ssp. planifolia from Thomson Bay, stem cuttings were taken from shrubs that had fewer stomata on adaxial leaf surfaces. The endemic ssp. tyrrellii is amphistomatic (Argus and Steele, 1979 ; Cooper and Cass, unpublished data), but ssp. planifolia has few to no stomata on the adaxial leaf surface. At this site, it may be possible that we collected stem cuttings from hybrids as well as ssp. planifolia. The two subspecies are quite similar morphologically, and the stomatal character has been useful in elucidating the identity of each (Argus and Steele, 1979 ; R. L. Cooper and J. Gould, personal observation). Furthermore, Orians et al. (1999) suggested that increased water availability may enhance relative performance of Salix hybrids. We feel that we collected pure ssp. planifolia from this shoreline site; however, the structural data from hybrid stem cuttings may explain the variation seen in the data sets for VE density and VE length. If the latter is true, additional morphological characters need to be evaluated to properly identify the subspecies of S. planifolia at the shore of Thomson Bay.

Taxonomic implications
The similarities of VE character data values within endemic–progenitor pairs illustrate the close taxonomic relationships between the Lake Athabasca sand dune endemics and their widespread boreal or arctic putative sister species. However, there were some notable differences among endemic–progenitor pairs. Salix brachycarpa var. psammophila and its progenitor had the highest VE density values of all willows in this study. In our opinion, this is most likely indicative of the taxonomic position of the S. brachycarpa endemic–progenitor pair. In a recent classification of New World Salix, Argus (1999) divided Salix into four subgenera. Salix brachycarpa var. psammophila and var. brachycarpa were placed in Salix subgenus Chamaetia (Dumort.) Nasarov, while the other three endemic–progenitor pairs were placed in Salix subgenus Vetrix (Dumort.) Dumort (Argus, 1999 ). We believe that little to no detectable variation in VE characters reflects the close taxonomic relationships within endemic–progenitor pairs. Furthermore, internal structural similarities support the putative evolutionary relationship between derived, endemic willows from the Athabasca sand dunes and their widespread sister species.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank Stefan Little for assistance with data collection and analysis; Joyce Gould, Patsy Cotterill, and Brett Purdy for assisting with plant collection and identification; Pat Crane and Ruth Stockey for providing comments on the manuscript; and Steven Williams, George Braybrook, Randy Mandryk, Rakesh Bhatnagar, and DiTRL at the University of Alberta for technical advice, assistance, and support. A Canadian Circumpolar Institute C/BAR grant and a Karling Graduate Student Research Award to RLC funded field-related activities, and laboratory work was supported by an NSERC grant to DDC. Back

2 Author for reprint requests. Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Argus, G. W. 1999 Classification of Salix in the New World. Botanical Electronic News ISSN 1188-603X, number 227

———, and J. W. Steele. 1979 A reevaluation of the taxonomy of Salix tyrrellii, a sand dune endemic. Systematic Botany 4: 163–177[CrossRef][ISI]

Arnold, D. H., and J. D. Mauseth. 1999 Effects of environmental factors on development of wood. American Journal of Botany 86: 367–371[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carlquist, S. 1975 Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA

———. 1988 Comparative wood anatomy: systematic, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA

Hermesh, R. 1972 A study of the ecology of the Athabasca sand dunes with emphasis on the phytogenic aspects of dune formation. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Plant Ecology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Johansen, D. A. 1940 Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA

Lovisolo, C., and A. Schubert. 1998 Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulic conductivity in Vitis vinifera L. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 693–700[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Orians, C. M., D. I. Bolnick, B. M. Roche, R. S. Fritz, and T. Floyd. 1999 Water availability alters the relative performance of Salix sericea, Salix eriocephala, and their F1 hybrids. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 514–522[CrossRef]

Purdy, B. G., and R. J. Bayer. 1995a Allozyme variation in the Athabasca sand dune endemic, Salix silicicola, and the closely related widespread, S. alaxensis. Systematic Botany 20: 179–190

———, and ———. 1995b Genetic diversity in the tetraploid sand dune endemic Deschampsia mackenzieana and its widespread progenitor D. cespitosa (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 121–130[CrossRef][ISI]

———, and ———. 1996 Genetic variation in populations of the endemic Achillea millefolium ssp. megacephala from the Athabasca sand dunes and the widespread ssp. lanulosa in western North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 4: 1138–1146

———, ———, and S. E. Macdonald. 1994 Genetic variation, breeding system evolution, and conservation of the narrow sand dune endemic Stellaria arenicola and the widespread S. longipes (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 904–911[CrossRef][ISI]

Raup, H. M. 1936 Phytogeographic studies in the Athabaska-Great Slave Lake region. I. Catalogue of the vascular plants. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 17: 180–315

———, and G. W. Argus. 1982 The Lake Athabasca sand dunes of northern Saskatchewan and Alberta, Canada: I. The land and vegetation. National Museum of Natural Sciences Publication number 12, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Smith, D. G. 1978 The Athabasca sand dunes: a physical inventory. Indian and Northern Affairs National Parks Branch Contract number 77-31, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, D. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS