Am. J. Bot. Join BSA Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, E. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, E. B.
(American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:1430-1436.)
© 2001 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Ecology

Response to ammonium and nitrate by a mycorrhizal annual invasive grass and native shrub in southern California1

Lidia C. Yoshida2 and Edith B. Allen

Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0124 USA

Received for publication June 13, 2000. Accepted for publication February 9, 2001.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The goal of this study was to determine the interaction of mycorrhizae and two N sources, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3), on the growth of a coastal sage scrub (CSS) species, Artemisia californica, and an exotic annual grass, Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens. Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition may be influencing the decline of CSS and replacement by exotic grasses, but the extent to which mycorrhizae are involved in shrubland decline is unknown. NO3 is the dominant form of deposition in southern California, although the native, uneutrophied soils have a greater concentration of NH4+. Seeds of each species were germinated in pots of sterile soil, inoculated with native soil containing mycorrhizal spores and infective root fragments, and fertilized with 50 µg/g of either NO3 or NH4+. NH4+ enhanced the growth of both mycorrhizal species, while NO3 did not. Control plants of B. madritensis under low N had a significant response to mycorrhizae, but A. californica did not. Nitrate increased the growth of nonmycorrhizal A. californica as much as the mycorrhizal NH4+-treated plants. There is no evidence in this study to suggest that the decline of A. californica or increase in B. madritensis is due to a mycorrhizal response to NO3. Other life history traits of the two species must be used to explain the invasive behavior of the annual grass. Mycorrhizae may be more important in controlling plant growth in native uneutrophied soils dominated by NH4+ rather than NO3.

Key Words: arbuscular mycorrhizae • Artemisia californicaBromus madritensis ssp. rubens • coastal sage scrub • nitrogen deposition


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Anthropogenic N deposition is a global problem that can cause vegetation-type conversion, such as low diversity grassland where there was once diverse shrubland (Heil et al., 1988 ; Vitousek et al., 1997 ; Bobbink, Horning, and Roelofs, 1998 ), but the mechanisms of vegetation change are not always clear. In this study we examined the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on uptake of soil NO3 vs. NH4+. Elevated NH4+ occurs predominantly in agricultural regions, such as The Netherlands where up to 90 kg N · ha–1 · yr–1 are deposited (Heil et al., 1988 ), while NO3 originates from automobile exhaust, as in southern California with a high of 45 kg N · ha–1 · yr–1 (Lents and Kelly, 1993 ; Fenn and Bytnerowicz, 1997 ; Fenn et al., 1998 ). Originally mycorrhizal fungi were shown to be more important in NH4+ assimilation, a result that was explained by its relatively low solubility compared to NO3 (Ames et al., 1983 ; Smith et al., 1985 ). More recent studies have shown mycorrhizae may also assimilate NO3 (Azcón, Gomez, and Tobar, 1992 ; Johansen, Jakobson, and Jensen, 1993 ; Cuenca and Azcón, 1994 ; Azcón and Tobar, 1998 ). The plant response to N deposition will depend upon the form of N and the ability of the plant and mycorrhizal fungi to take up different N forms. We describe a greenhouse study using plants and soil from a southern California shrubland where NO3 is the predominant form of deposition (Padgett et al., 1999 ). We examined whether the presence of mycorrhizae in the local vegetation was exacerbating the uptake of deposited NO3 or whether the mycorrhizae were having little effect on NO3 uptake, as hypothesized earlier by Ames et al. (1983) .

A major mechanism of vegetation change under N deposition is the enhanced growth of some species compared to others. Studies in a European heathland that has converted to grassland indicate that the competitive ability of the grass Brachypodium pinnatum (L) Beauv. was increased by NH4+ deposition (van Dam et al., 1990 ). Mediterranean annual grasses have been replacing coastal sage scrub (CSS) vegetation in southern California over the last few decades (Freudenberger, Fish, and Keeley, 1987 ; O'Leary, 1995 ; Minnich and Dezzani, 1998 ). A number of causes have been hypothesized, including frequent fire and grazing, but N deposition has only recently been considered (Allen et al., 1998, 2000 ). In areas where exotic grasses have replaced native shrubs, excessive N deposition may maintain grass dominance. Extractable soil N up to 87 µg/g have been observed in southern California, about two-thirds as NO3 (Allen et al., 1998 ; Padgett et al., 1999 ). Plants show great variation in their ability to use either NH4+, NO3, or both (Haynes and Goh, 1978 ; Falkengren-Grerup, 1995 ). Native shrubs and invasive annuals of CSS had plastic responses to both elevated NO3 and NH4+ in the greenhouse (Padgett and Allen, 1999 ), but these experiments were done in sterile soil and were not designed to test a mycorrhizal effect.

Different species of AMF can also show preference for uptake of NH4+ vs. NO3 as shown by isotope applications to plants combined with hyphal transport (Azcón, Gomez, and Tobar, 1992 ; Vaast and Zasoski, 1992 ; Johansen, Jakobsen, and Jensen, 1993 ; Tobar, Azcón, and Barea, 1994 ; George, Marschner, and Jakobsen, 1995 ). Absorption of different forms of N would be promoted by mycorrhizal associations with multiple species of fungi (Chapin, 1980 ), as occurs in CSS vegetation. In a recent study on a N deposition gradient in southern California, AMF spore diversity and abundance were reduced in regions with high N deposition (Egerton-Warburton and Allen, 2000) . Large-spored AMF species declined in high N soils, while many small-spored species became more abundant (Johnson et al., 1991 ; Egerton-Warburton and Allen, 2000 ). Four of the species found in some of the sites of the gradient study, Glomus etunicatum (Becker & Gerdemann), G. mosseae (Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerdemann & Trappe, G. macrocarpum (Tul. & Tul.), and G. fasciculatum (Thaxter sensu Gerdemann) Gerdemann & Trappe, are known to assimilate NO3, NH4+, or both (Ho and Trappe, 1975 ; Smith et al., 1985 ; Cuenca and Azcón, 1994 ; Azcón and Tobar, 1998 ). Nitrate reductase, the enzyme critical for the first step in NO3 assimilation, was detected in AMF spores of Glomus mosseae, indicating a role of AMF in N uptake (Ho and Trappe, 1975 ). Enzymes involved in NH4+ assimilation have also been isolated in AMF (Smith et al., 1985 ).

Since AMF may differ in uptake of NH4+ and NO3, any change in soil N levels or form resulting from increased N deposition may lead to a change in the behavior of mycorrhizal systems. The objective of the study was to determine (1) growth response to NO3 and NH4+ by a dominant native shrub, Artemisia californica Less. (California sagebrush), and an abundant invasive annual grass, Bromus madritensis L. ssp. rubens (foxtail chess), and (2) how AMF influence growth response to NO3 and NH4+ in these two species.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Inoculum
Native mycorrhizal inoculum was collected in December 1996 to a depth of 10 cm with soil corers from beneath A. californica shrubs at Lake Skinner in the Western Riverside County Multispecies Reserve (33°37' W, 117°02' N) California, USA, elevation 450 m. This site was chosen because of its rural location and relatively low levels of atmospheric N deposition (Allen et al., 1998 ; Padgett et al., 1999 ). The inoculum was sieved through a 1-mm screen, thoroughly mixed, sealed, placed in a freezer at –12°C, and used within 4 mo. Spore extraction was done by sucrose flotation (Allen et al., 1979 ), and spores were collected with a Buchner funnel and 0.45-µm mesh membrane filter (GN-6 Grid, Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). The spores were counted with a dissecting microscope, and the inoculum contained >200 mycorrhizal spores per gram of sieved soil.

Soil and potting
Native soil was also collected in the Multispecies Reserve for the greenhouse experiment. Before the experiment, the soil cation exchange capacity was 7.4 µmol/100 g (SE = 1.4, N = 5). P concentration (bicarbonate extractable) was 28.8 (2.7) µg/g. Mean KCl-extractable N was 14.5 µg/g NH4+ and 0.8 µg/g NO3 while total Kjeldahl N was 396 (9.9) µg/g.

The soil was sieved through a 1-cm2 wire sieve and mixed with 50% sterile sand, placed in autoclave bags, and steam-sterilized for at least 2 h at 82°C. Two days later, the steaming process was repeated to kill potential germinating spores. Inoculum (5 g) was buried 4 cm deep in pots (6.4 x 25 cm "Deepots," Steuwe and Sons, Corvallis, Oregon, USA) containing 830 g soil mix. Sterile inoculum was added to controls. A sievate (45-µm mesh) from 5 g soil per pot was added to replace microbial populations in controls. Twenty-five milliliters of a specially formulated nutrient solution (described below) and 10 mL of N treatment were added to pots before the seeds were sown into the pots. Ten replicates per treatment were used in this factorial study resulting in a total of 120 plants (two plant species x two mycorrhizal treatments x three N treatments). To assess AMF colonization sequentially, a preliminary experiment was done using the soils and inoculum described above.

Seeds and planting conditions
Seeds of B. madritensis and A. californica were collected from the Motte Rimrock Reserve, ~15 km northwest of Lake Skinner and stored dry at room temperature until planting. Three B. madritensis and ten A. californica seeds were sown into each pot with a thin soil cover. After germination, the seedlings were thinned to one plant per pot, watered as needed, and maintained in a greenhouse at 21°C from March to May, 1997.

Fertilization and harvesting
All of the plants were fertilized with a specially formulated nutrient solution (minus P and N) based on analyses of native soil (Padgett and Allen, 1999 ). The seedlings initially received 50 mL of one of three N solutions (control, 10 µg/g N from NH4NO3; high NO3 treatment, 50 µg/g NO3 from Ca(NO3)2; high NH4+ treatment, 50 µg/g NH4+ from NH4Cl) at the beginning of the experiment. An additional 50 mL of N solution was added approximately every 2 wk to maintain high N levels in the N treatments, but none to the controls. Five-gram soil samples were collected in the top 5 cm of the pot of A. californica and analyzed for NH4+ and NO3 concentrations by KCl extraction. During the course of the experiment, the soil N levels in the controls were <20 µg/g NH4+ and NO3. Soil N levels in the NO3 treatment rose to ~160 µg/g at harvest, while those in the NH4+ treatment remained between 100 and 120 µg/g. Electrical conductivity was 0.16 dS/m in the control, 0.22 in NO3 treatment, and 0.59 in the NH4+ treatment at harvest. The pH varied from 6.5 to 7.0 but was not significantly different among treatments. Beginning 5 wk after germination, and weekly thereafter, plant height (A. californica and B. madritensis) and width (A. californica only) and numbers of leaves and tillers (B. madritensis only) were recorded.

Bromus madritensis and A. californica were harvested 7 and 8 wk after germination, respectively. Bromus madritensis was harvested 1 wk earlier before it began to fill seeds, as we did not wish to assess reproductive effort in this study. Shoot and root tissue were separated. Roots were washed, and tissue was oven dried at 60°C for 72 h and weighed. A subsample of the roots was prepared for mycorrhizal staining with trypan blue (Koske and Gemma, 1989 ). Percentage root colonization was determined by microscopically examining 100 root intercepts per sample. In addition, three replicates of each species were harvested at 2-wk intervals from control pots in a preliminary experiment to determine dynamics of AMF over time (in the preliminary experiment both plant species were maintained for 8 wk).

Nutrient analyses
Shoot tissue was ground with liquid nitrogen and %N was determined by flash combustion chromatography (Carlo Erba Instruments, Fisons, Dearborn, Michigan, USA). The shoot tissue was prepared for P analysis by microwave digestion (Miller and Sah, 1992 ). P concentration was determined spectrophotometrically with the malachite green method (Ohno and Zibilske, 1991 ).

Statistical analyses
The growth data were analyzed by factorial analysis of variance followed by LSD0.05 (least significant difference). Growth data over time were analyzed by performing a repeated-measures analysis of variance across all three N treatments. Repeated-measures ANOVA was also performed on each individual N treatment to assess the influence of mycorrhizae on nondestructive measures of plant growth (height, volume, and number of leaves) within each treatment. Plant biomass data were (1 + ln)-transformed to reduce kurtosis and subjected to a two-way factorial ANOVA (nitrogen x mycorrhizal treatment). Roots, shoots, and total biomass were analyzed separately.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Mycorrhizal colonization
In the controls that were harvested sequentially the maximum percentage of colonization occurred at ~6 wk following germination (Fig. 1). However, mycorrhizal colonization was very low in the main study (0–6% arbuscules, 0–2% hyphae, 0–4% vesicles) in all treatments in both A. californica and B. madritensis at the time of harvest. Mycorrhizal spores, vesicles, and hyphae were observed on a low percentage of the roots. The uninoculated plants were not mycorrhizal, nor was there evidence of pathogens in the roots.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Progress of mycorrhizal colonization in Bromus madritensis and Artemisia californica over 8 wk in low N treatment (control)

 
Growth
As the plants grew during the experiment, only plants receiving NH4+ had a mycorrhizal response, measured as an increase in volume and height (Fig. 2). By the end of the experiment, the mycorrhizal, NH4+-treated plants were significantly taller and had greater volume than the nonmycorrhizal NH4+ treatments. The growth of the nonmycorrhizal plants in this NH4+ treatment was indistinguishable from the controls. NO3 treatment enhanced growth, but there were no significant differences between mycorrhizal treatments. The plants showed growth responses to the N and mycorrhizal treatments 6 wk after germination.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Weekly measurements of (A) volume and (B) height of mycorrhizal (open circles) and nonmycorrhizal (solid circles) A. californica starting the fifth week after germination. P values in lightface type are results of repeated-measures analysis of variance within treatments. P values in boldface type are repeated-measures analysis of variance between treatments. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between mycorrhizal treatments as tested by the LSD (least significant difference) test are indicated by asterisks (*). Standard errors are indicated by bars at each data point. M, mycorrhizae; W, week measured

 
For B. madritensis, mycorrhizal colonization significantly increased the numbers of leaves, stems, and height (leaf length) in the NH4+ treatment (Fig. 3). However, mycorrhizae did not affect any of these growth measurements in the NO3 treatment, and mycorrhizae increased only stems and height of control plants. The plants that had the overall greatest growth measurements were in the mycorrhizal, NH4+ treatments compared to the other N and mycorrhizal treatments, while the nonmycorrhizal, NH4+ plants tended to be smaller in these measures.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Weekly measurements of (A) number of leaves, (B) number of stems, and (C) height of longest leaf of mycorrhizal (open circles) and nonmycorrhizal (solid circles) B. madritensis starting the fifth week following germination. P values set in lightface type are results of repeated-measures analysis of variance within treatments. P values set in boldface type are repeated-measures analysis of variance performed between treatments. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between mycorrhizal treatments as tested by the LSD test are indicated by asterisks (*). Standard errors are indicated by bars at each data point. M, mycorrhizae; N, nitrogen treatment; W, week measured

 
The P values shown in normal type within each individual graph (Figs. 2, 3) are results of a repeated-measures analysis of variance performed on individual N treatments to evaluate response to mycorrhizal treatment. In this analysis, the only independent variable is mycorrhizae. For instance, a significant PM value is shown only for the mycorrhizal response to NH4+, but not for NO3 or for the control (Fig. 2). The P values in boldface type shown beneath the graphs (Figs. 2, 3) are results of a repeated-measures analysis of variance for plant dimensions over time as dependent variables, and nitrogen and mycorrhizae as independent variables. Significant P values here indicate a significant difference among the nitrogen and mycorrhizal treatments and their interactions. Only those P values that are significant are listed below the graphs in boldface, not all potential interactions. For instance, a significant PN indicates that plants responded more under some N treatments (NH4+) than others, while a significant interaction PNM indicates that mycorrhizal plants responded more to some N treatments (NH4+) than others. Significant PW interactions simply show that the different treatments had different rates of growth over weeks in the repeated-measures analysis.

Biomass
NH4+-treated plants of both species had a positive total biomass (shoot plus root) response to mycorrhizal inoculum, but inoculum did not cause a significant change in biomass of NO3 treated plants of either species (Fig. 4A, B, Table 1). Mycorrhizae were so important for an NH4+ growth response of A. californica that the nonmycorrhizal NH4+-treated plants were as small as the nonmycorrhizal controls. Control plants of B. madritensis had increased total mass with inoculum compared to uninoculated control plants, but control plants of A. californica were not significantly affected by inoculum. Consequently, there was a significant N x mycorrhizae interaction for the total mass in A. californica with P = 0.006 while for B. madritensis the interaction P = 0.077.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Total biomass of shoot and root mass of (A) A. californica and (B) B. madritensis. Lowercase letters (a, b, for total biomass; l, m, n for shoot mass; y, z for root mass) indicate differences between treatments are significantly different (P < 0.05) within each species. Bar = LSD0.05 for total biomass. M, mycorrhizae; NM, no mycorrhizae

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. P values for results of Fisher's PLSD (protected least significant difference) test between N and mycorrhizal treatments in shoot, root, and total mass of Artemisia californica and Bromus madritensis. C = controls, M = mycorrhizal, NM = nonmycorrhizal. P values set in boldface type are significantly different (P < 0.05) between treatments

 
Statistical differences in shoot mass were similar to total mass of A. californica, but root mass of A. californica did not follow quite the same trend as shoot mass. Most of the treatments produced similar root mass, with the exception of the nonmycorrhizal N treatments; the NO3-treated nonmycorrhizal roots had significantly greater biomass than those treated with NH4+. However, when root:shoot ratios (r : s) were calculated and analyzed statistically, there were no significant differences in r : s among the treatments, with overall mean r : s of 0.81.

For B. madritensis only, the NH4+-treated mycorrhizal plants had both higher shoot and root mass than any of the other treatments. The mean r : s was 1.26, also without significant differences among mycorrhiza and N treatments.

An overall ANOVA comparing the total biomass of the two plant species (not shown) was not significantly different (i.e., they had similar overall mean biomass values), nor were there significant species x N treatment or species x mycorrhizal treatment interactions. In this ANOVA there was only a significant overall N x mycorrhiza interaction (P < 0.001).

Nutrients
Shoot N concentration varied between species. In A. californica, N concentration did not differ greatly (Fig. 5A), except in the NH4+ treatments where the mycorrhizal plants had significantly lower N in their tissues than did the nonmycorrhizal plants. The N concentrations in control plants were not significantly different from the N in NH4+ and NO3 treatments. In B. madritensis (Fig. 5B), control plants contained significantly less N in their tissues (~1% N) than either of the N-treated plants (~3.4–4.2% N). Mycorrhizal colonization did not have any significant effect on shoot N content. Shoot P content in B. madritensis was greater (0.49–0.68%) than A. californica (0.25–0.44%). While there were some significant differences in %P between N treatments in A. californica, there were no differences between mycorrhizal treatments within the N treatments in either A. californica or B. madritensis.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Concentrations of N and P in shoots of (A) A. californica and (B) B. madritensis. Lowercase letters above bars indicate differences between treatments are significantly different (P < 0.05)

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Both A. californica and B. madritensis had a large mycorrhizal response with NH4+ fertilizer. NH4+-treated A. californica had 270% greater biomass of mycorrhizal than nonmycorrhizal plants, and mycorrhizal biomass was 224% greater for B. madritensis for mycorrhizal than for nonmycorrhizal plants. However, neither species had a mycorrhizal response to NO3, but the nonmycorrhizal plants of both species did respond to NO3. The mycorrhizal responses of A. californica and B. madritensis were similar to other studies where mycorrhizae enhanced growth with NH4+ (Ames et al., 1983 ; Vaast and Zasoski, 1992 ). The natural soils where A. californica occurs in this region are slightly acidic with pH 6.0–6.5 and tend to be dominated by NH4+. Soils with low N deposition had a seasonal maximum of 9–17 µg/g NH4+ and 2–7 µg/g NO3 (Padgett et al., 1999 ). Thus, mycorrhizal A. californica is well adapted to growth in these soils, and the invasive B. madritensis also responded well to NH4+ with inoculum.

Other studies showed that mycorrhizal hyphae may transport NO3 and thereby improve its uptake by the plant (Azcón, Gomez, and Tobar, 1992 ; Johansen, Jakobsen, and Jensen, 1993 ; Cuenca and Azcón, 1994 ), but there was no mycorrhizal response to NO3 by either of our species. The plants were taking up both forms of N, as tissue N increased under fertilization. For B. madritensis, the increase in leaf N was a large 1.2% in controls to 4.2% with NO3, although leaf N was not as plastic for A. californica. These ranges of tissue N concentrations have been observed in other field and greenhouse studies (Mooney et al., 1977 ; Garnier et al., 1997 ; Padgett and Allen, 1999 ). The lack of growth response by mycorrhizal NO3- treated plants could be readily explained if these plants had lower mycorrhizal colonization, because plants with sufficient nutrients can reject mycorrhizal fungi. For instance, lower mycorrhizal colonization was observed for A. californica and annual grasses under high NO3 deposition in the field (Egerton-Warburton and Allen, 2000) . However, further detailed analyses of colonization rates over time coupled with carbon balance of N-fertilized plants need to be undertaken.

Although mycorrhizal colonization was low, the results of the preliminary sequential harvest indicated that by 6 wk 15% of A. californica and B. madritensis roots became colonized with arbuscules. This percentage of arbuscules may be sufficient to colonize all the actively growing root tips and cause a beneficial mycorrhizal response (Allen, 2001) . Mycorrhizal colonization was likely highest at 6 wk and had declined by the time plants were harvested at 7–8 wk. Mycorrhizal structures such as arbuscules are short-lived and can be expected to turn over in 1–2 wk (Smith and Read, 1997 ). Although soil P levels were relatively high (28 µg/g) and plants might not be expected to respond to inoculum, the NH4+-amended plants still had a high response to mycorrhizae. The soils of this region are generally high in P (Padgett et al., 1999 ), so these results reflect normal field soil conditions. Low colonization of 10–20% were typical for both these species in the greenhouse (Yoshida, 1999 ; Sigüenza, 2000 ), yet colonization levels up to 40–80% have been reported in the field for mature A. californica (Egerton-Warburton and Allen, 2000; Sigüenza, 2000) . Soil disturbance during potting disrupted the network of external mycorrhizal hyphae and would have reduced the fungal infectivity of the soil (Jasper, Abbott, and Robson, 1989 ). However, seedlings of A. californica in a restored field plot with minimum soil disturbance had only 22% colonization after 2 yr (Sigüenza, 2000 ). The results of this study can be extrapolated to establishing seedlings, but the mycorrhizal response to N may be greater in a mature CSS community with higher levels of colonization.

These two plant species have different life forms, but both had somewhat similar patterns of NO3 and NH4+ growth response with and without mycorrhizae. One difference in N response was that nonmycorrhizal A. californica had growth with NO3 as large as the mycorrhizal NH4+-treated plants, while B. madritensis treated with NO3 were significantly smaller than mycorrhizal NH4+-treated plants. The other difference in response was that the mycorrhizal controls of B. madritensis had higher biomass and were taller with more tillers than nonmycorrhizal controls, while controls of A. californica did not respond significantly to inoculum. Overall, later-successional and woody plants tend to be responsive to mycorrhizae, while early-successional plants tend to be less responsive (Corkidi and Rincon, 1997 ). However, if anything, B. madritensis was slightly more responsive than the shrub because both the control and the NH4+-treated B. madritensis responded to mycorrhizae. With regard to N uptake, there is variance in whether plant species prefer NH4+ or NO3, and life form need not be a factor in preference (Wallace et al., 1978 ; Smirnoff and Stewart, 1985 ). It was not possible from these two plant species to predict NH4+ and NO3 uptake or mycorrhizal response based on life form. Artemisia californica and B. madritensis may be considered members of the same successional stage, because the invasive species has stabilized in CSS communities. The similar responses to mycorrhizae and N may be reflective of adaptation to the same environmental conditions.

The spore species of mycorrhizal fungi are reduced in diversity and density in NO3-affected soils in southern California (Egerton-Warburton and Allen, 2000) , which may cause a further feedback on plant growth. For instance, plant growth was reduced by inoculum from N-fertilized soils in Minnesota, as AMF that are poor mutualists became dominant in eutrophied soils (Johnson, 1993 ). In our study, we used only inoculum from a soil unaffected by N deposition, so the results are relevant to a situation where the full complement of spore species is present. If the AMF adapted to high N soils are poorer mutualists (Johnson, 1993 ), then poor plant performance with N-affected inoculum may be an additional stress on plants. This will be the subject of a separate study.

The mycorrhizal growth responses alone do not explain the poor performance of A. californica in declining shrublands of southern California. A longer term experiment under elevated NH4NO3 gave a different result, where soil N levels of 50 µg/g caused mortality of A. californica after 6–9 mo, even though it grew very large in this experiment (Allen et al., 1998 ). Bromus madritensis completes its life cycle and produces seeds within the short Mediterranean growing season (2–3 mo), so it escapes the potential negative effects of high soil N. N levels in the surface of eutrophied soil may be up to 87 µg/g, although we have not verified N-induced shrub mortality in the field. Additional life history traits of B. madritensis and A. californica may also explain shrub decline. For instance, B. madritensis has rapid germination with the first winter rains, prolific seed production, and high densities and competitive ability compared to A. californica (Eliason and Allen, 1997 ; Stylinski and Allen, 1999 ). Mycorrhizae would likely be more important to growth of these two plant species under NH4+ deposition. The eutrophication of a soil with moderate levels of NH4+ to a soil with high NO3 means that the functioning of mycorrhizae will change from a beneficial response to a less important role for promoting plant growth.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank S. Morita, S. Lau, and N. Storms for their technical help, P. Padgett for help with nitrogen dynamics, and D. Parker for immense help with P analyses. Research was supported by a US EPA STAR graduate fellowship number U-914994-01-0 and USDA NRI number 95-37101-1700. Back

2 Author for reprint requests, current address: School of Biological Sciences, 419 Steinhaus Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2527 USA (FAX: 949-824-6599; lyoshida{at}uci.edu ). Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Allen E. B. S. A. Eliason V. J. Marquez G. P. Schultz N. K. Storms C. D. Stylinski T. A. Zink M. F. Allen 2000 What are the limits to restoration of coastal sage scrub in southern California?. In J. E. Keeley, M. B. Keeley, and C. J. Fotheringham [eds.], Second interface between ecology and land development in California, 253–261. USGS Open-File Report 00-62, Sacramento, California, USA

———, P. E. Padgett A. Bytnerowicz R. A. Minnich 1998 Nitrogen deposition effects on coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In A. Bytnerowicz, M. J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling [tech. coords.], Proceedings of the International Symposium on Air Pollution and Climate Change Effects on Forest Ecosystems. Riverside, California, February 5–9, 1996. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, PSW-GTR-166, 131–140. http://www.rfl.psw.fs.fed.us/pubs/psw-gtr-164/fulltext/allen/allen.html-anchor1473574

Allen M. F. 2001 Modeling arbuscular mycorrhizal infection: is % infection an appropriate variable?. Mycorrhiza. In press

———, T. S. Moore Jr. M. Christensen N. Stanton 1979 Growth of vesicular-arbuscular-mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis in a defined medium. Mycologia 71: 666-669[CrossRef][ISI]

Ames R. N. C. P. P. Reid L. K. Porter C. Cambardell 1983 Hyphal uptake and transport of nitrogen from two 15N-labelled sources by Glomus mosseae, a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytologist 95: 381-396[CrossRef][ISI]

Azcón R. M. Gomez R. Tobar 1992 Effects of nitrogen source on growth, nutrition, photosynthetic rate and nitrogen metabolism of mycorrhizal and phosphorus-fertilized plants of Lactuca sativa L. New Phytologist 121: 227-234[CrossRef][ISI]

———, and R. M. Tobar 1998 Activity of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in shoot and root of mycorrhizal Allium cepa: effect of drought stress. Plant Science 133: 1-8[CrossRef][ISI]

Bobbink R. M. Horning J. G. M. Roelofs 1998 The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. Journal of Ecology 86: 717-738[CrossRef][ISI]

Chapin III F. S. 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 233-260

Corkidi L. E. Rincon 1997 Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a tropical sand dune ecosystem on the Gulf of Mexico: II. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of species distributed in different early successional stages. Mycorrhiza 7: 17-23

Cuenca G. R. Azcón 1994 Effects of ammonium and nitrate on the growth of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal Erythrina poeppigiana O. I. Cook seedlings. Biology and Fertility of Soils 18: 249-254

Egerton-Warburton L. M. E. B. Allen 2000 Shifts in the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi along an anthropogenic nitrogen gradient. Ecological Applications 10: 484-496[CrossRef][ISI]

Eliason S. A. E. B. Allen 1997 Competition as a mechanism for exotic grass persistence following conversion from native shrubland. Restoration Ecology 5: 245-255

Falkengren-Grerup U. 1995 Interspecies differences in the preference of ammonium and nitrate in vascular plants. Oecologia 102: 305-311[CrossRef][ISI]

Fenn M. E. A. Bytnerowicz 1997 Summer throughfall and winter deposition in the San Bernardino mountains in southern California. Atmospheric Environment 31: 673-683[CrossRef]

———, M. A. Poth J. D. Aber J. S. Baron B. T. Bormann D. W. Johnson A. D. Lemly S. G. McNulty D. F. Ryan R. S. Stottlemeyer 1998 Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies. Ecological Applications 8: 706-733[CrossRef][ISI]

Freudenberger D. O. B. E. Fish J. E. Keeley 1987 Distribution and stability of grasslands in the Los Angeles Basin. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 86: 13-26

Garnier E. P. Cordonnier J. L. Guillerm L. Sonié 1997 Specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration in annual and perennial grass species growing in Mediterranean old-fields. Oecologia 11: 490-498

George E. H. Marschner I. Jakobsen 1995 Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen from soil. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 15: 257-270[ISI]

Haynes R. J. K. M. Goh 1978 Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of plants. Biological Reviews 58: 465-510

Heil G. W. M. J. A. Werger W. de Mol D. van Dam B. Heijne 1988 Capture of atmospheric ammonium by grassland canopies. Science 239: 764-765[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ho I. J. M. Trappe 1975 Nitrate reducing capacity of two vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia 67: 886-888

Jasper D. A. L. K. Abbott A. D. Robson 1989 Soil disturbance reduces the infectivity of external hyphae of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 112: 93-99[CrossRef][ISI]

Johansen A. I. Jakobsen E. S. Jensen 1993 External hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum L. 3. Hyphal transport of 32P and 15N. New Phytologist 124: 61-68[CrossRef][ISI]

Johnson N. C. 1993 Can fertilization of soil select less mutualistic mycorrhizae?. Ecological Applications 3: 749-757[CrossRef][ISI]

———, D. R. Zak D. Tilman F. L. Pfleger 1991 Dynamics of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during old field succession. Oecologia 86: 349-358[CrossRef][ISI]

Koske R. E. J. N. Gemma 1989 A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycological Research 92: 486-488[ISI]

Lents J. M. W. J. Kelly 1993 Clearing the air in Los Angeles. Scientific American 269: 32-39[ISI][Medline]

Miller R. O. R. N. Sah 1992 Spontaneous reaction for acid dissolution of biological tissues in closed vessels. Analytical Chemistry 64: 230-233[Medline]

Minnich R. A. R. J. Dezzani 1998 Historical decline of coastal sage scrub in the Riverside-Perris plain, California. Western Birds 29: 366-391

Mooney H. A. J. Kummerow A. W. Johnson D. J. Parsons S. Keeley A. Hoffman R. I. Hays J. Giliberto C. Chu 1977 The producers—their resources and adaptive responses. In H. A. Mooney [ed.], Convergent evolution in Chile and California: Mediterranean climate ecosystems, 85–143. Dowden, Hutchinsen and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA

Ohno T. L. M. Zibilske 1991 Determinations of low concentrations of phosphorus in soil extracts using malachite green. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55: 892-895[Abstract/Free Full Text]

O'Leary J. F. 1995 Coastal sage scrub: threats and current status. Fremontia 23: 27-31

Padgett P. E. E. B. Allen 1999 Differential responses to nitrogen fertilization in native shrubs and exotic annuals common to mediterranean coastal sage scrub of California. Plant Ecology 144: 93-101[CrossRef][ISI]

———, ———, A. Bytnerowicz R. A. Minnich 1999 Changes in soil inorganic nitrogen as related to atmospheric nitrogenous pollutants in southern California. Atmospheric Environment 33: 769-781[CrossRef]

Sigüenza C. 2000 Nitrogen deposition and soil microorganisms of Artemisia californica and exotic grasses in southern California. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Riverside, California, USA

Smirnoff N. G. R. Stewart 1985 Nitrate assimilation by higher plants: comparative physiology and ecological consequences. Physiologia Plantarum 64: 133-140[CrossRef]

Smith S. E. D. J. Read 1997 Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA

———, B. J. St. John F. A. Smith D. J. D. Nicholas 1985 Activity of glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in Allium cepa L. and Trifolium subterraneum L.: effect of mycorrhizal infection and phosphate nutrition. New Phytologist 99: 211-227[CrossRef][ISI]

Stylinski C. D. E. B. Allen 1999 Lack of native species recovery following severe exotic disturbance in southern California shrublands. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 544-554[CrossRef][ISI]

Tobar R. R. Azcón J. M. Barea 1994 Improved nitrogen uptake and transport from 15N-labelled nitrate by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhiza under water-stressed conditions. New Phytologist 126: 119-122[CrossRef][ISI]

Vaast P. R. J. Zasoski 1992 Effects of VA-mycorrhizae and nitrogen sources on rhizosphere soil characteristics, growth and nutrient acquisition of coffee seedlings (Coffea arabica L.). Plant and Soil 147: 31-39[CrossRef][ISI]

van Dam D. D. W. Heil R. Bobbink B. Heijne 1990 Atmospheric deposition to grassland canopies: lysimeter budgets discriminating between interception deposition, mineral weathering and mineralization. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 53: 83-101[ISI]

Vitousek P. M. J. D. Aber R. W. Howarth G. E. Likens P. A. Matson D. W. Schindler W. H. Schlesinger D. G. Tilman 1997 Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7: 737-750[CrossRef][ISI]

Wallace A. E. M. Romney G. E. Kleinkopf S. M. Soufi 1978 Uptake of mineral forms of nitrogen by desert plants. In N. E. West and J. J. Skujins [eds.], Nitrogen in desert ecosystems, US/IBP Synthesis Series, vol. 9, 130–151. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania, USA

Yoshida L. C. 1999 Ammonium and nitrate additions to a mycorrhizal annual invasive grass, Bromus madritensis, and Artemisia californica in coastal sage scrub: greenhouse and field studies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Riverside, California, USA




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Pornon, N. Escaravage, and T. Lamaze
Complementarity in mineral nitrogen use among dominant plant species in a subalpine community
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1778 - 1785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, E. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, E. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS