|
|
||||||||
Biomechanics |
Institute for Biology III, University of Freiburg, Germany
Received for publication March 29, 2001. Accepted for publication July 31, 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
= 0, 0.5, and 1. For other values of
, including cases where the modulus of elasticity varies over the length of the stem, approximations leading to an upper and a lower estimate of the frequency of oscillation can be derived. For the limiting case of
= 0, the differential equation is identical with Greenhill's equation for the stability against Euler buckling of a top-loaded slender pole. For stems without top loads, Mathematica 4.0 returns solutions only for two limiting cases, zero gravity (realized approximately for oscillations in a horizontal orientation of the stem) and for
= 0 (Greenhill's equation). Approximations can be derived for all other cases. As an example, the oscillation of an Arundo donax plant stem is described.
Key Words: Arundo donax differential equations free oscillation taper top load
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present approach generalizes this to plant stems with or without apical loads, with different tapering modes and with changes of the modulus of elasticity and of density from the base to the apex as usually observed in plant stems. Geometric input parameters are the total length, the cross-sectional area and the second moment of area of the stem at the base. The results, therefore, relate to any cross section if, at least for cross sections with a symmetry less than threefold, the plane of bending is specified.
Several examples of the solution of the differential equation are presented and approximations for others are outlined. Intermediate values can be interpolated or calculated directly by the Mathematica 4.0 program given. The accuracy of the approach is tested against the oscillation frequency of a tapered plastic rod. Its applicability for plant stems is exemplified by quantitative analyses of video recordings of an Arundo donax stem.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| COMPUTATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
![]() | (1) |
With
= y/yT, Differential Eq. 1 can be rewritten in the form
For A = 0 (i.e.,
= 0) Eq. 3ae becomes identical to Greenhill's equation for the stability of a top-loaded slender rod against Euler buckling (Greenhill, 1881
; Spatz, 2000
).
The remaining problem is to find numerical values for combinations of A and B, which characterize the fundamental frequency of free vibration. The equivalent condition for any given value of B is the solution of Differential Eq. 3a with the boundary conditions (Eq. 3d), which fullfills
(zT) = 1.
Figure 2 is an example of a solution of Differential Eq. 3 as returned by Mathematica 4.0. The output gives the function
(z). The plot
(z) against z displays the actual bending line. Figure 3 shows how the acceleration term A and therefore
according to Eq. 3c depends on the gravitational term B for those values of the tapering mode for which a solution is available. The lines through the data points are fitted by a second-order polynomial
|
|
= 0.5. It is physically impossible to apply a weight on the very tip of a tapering column. Correspondingly for
or ß
0 solutions are only obtained for zT > 0, i.e., for a truncated column.
|
= 1/yT x (y g/
2) we obtain for (
2 +
2)
2
Eq. 6ad is equivalent to Eq. 3ae for B = 0, i.e., in principle for zero gravity. It should be noted though that Eq. 4 is only valid if the stem in its resting position can be considered nearly horizontal over its entire length. This requires a very stiff rod, such that the downward deflection is small. From cantilever theory it follows that this can be expressed by
Exact solutions in form of linear combinations of elementary functions are obtained for Differential Eq. 6ad, i.e., for oscillations of a top-loaded plant stem or rod oriented horizontally. Figure 5 shows how the acceleration term A and therefore
according to Eq. 6b depends on the tapering mode
and the mode of dependence of the modulus of elasticity ß.
|
, aB the cross-sectional area at the base, and
the density of the stem at a particular height. For plant stems the variation of
along the stem can be approximated by
=
Bz
with z = x/L, where
B is the density at the base and
the mode of dependence.
|
For H = 0 (i.e.,
= 0) Eq. 8ae becomes identical to Greenhill's equation for the stability of a slender pole without top load (Greenhill, 1881; Spatz, 2000
).
The remaining problem is to find numerical values for H and G, which characterize the fundamental frequency of free vibration. The equivalent condition is the least positive singularity in the solution of the differential equation with the above boundary conditions. Mathematica 4.0 solves Differential Eq. 8ae only for G = 0 or H = 0 (Fig. 7). Approximations for G and H
0 can be obtained as outlined below.
|
according to Eq. 8c as a function of the tapering mode
, the mode of dependence of the modulus of elasticity ß, and the mode of dependence of the gravity
along the stem as typically observed for plant stems (V. Fässler and H.-C. Spatz, unpublished data). The data can be approximated by fifth-order polynomials (Table 1). For this and all other cases considered intermediate values can be interpolated or computed directly with Mathematica 4.0 as shown in Figs. 2 and 7.
|
|
| APPROXIMATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
+ ß = 0, 2 or 4 with independent
and ß. For all other values, solutions are only provided for A = 0 or B = 0. As noted before, for A = 0 Differential Eq. 3ae is identical to Greenhill's equation, and B = 0 corresponds to zero gravity or is realized by a stem in the horizontal position being nearly straight (see above).
For all other cases approximations can be obtained by considering the potential energy during oscillations (Timoshenko and Young, 1948
).
The strain energy of bending the stem is
h. The corresponding potential energy is
With
= y/yT, Eq. 3a and 3b and the abbreviations
![]() | (12) |
The evaluation of the numerical terms K1 and K2 requires the knowledge of the bending line y(z). Timoshenko and Young (1948)
used a cosine function. A better approximation, especially for strongly tapered columns, uses the bending lines for the two limiting cases: (1) For A
0,
(z) is chosen as solution of Eq. 3ae with A = 0, i.e., Greenhill's equation for Euler buckling; (2) For B
0,
(z) is chosen as solution of Differential Eq. 3ae with B = 0, i.e., zero gravity or horizontal orientation provided that the downward deflection in its resting position is small.
This is illustrated for
= 1 in Fig. 9. Applying Eq. 10 and choosing a solution of Eq. 3ae for A = 0 leads to a straight line through (0, A0) and (B*, 0), and choosing a solution of equation Eq. 3ae for B = 0 leads to a straight line through (0, A*) and (B0, 0), where A0 = A(B = 0) and B0 = B(A = 0) are exact solutions.
![]() | (6) |
|
between 0 and 1.5.
|
= 0.25.
|
The strain energy of bending the stem can be calculated analogically to Eq. 9
During the oscillation each part of the stem experiences a vertical displacement. The corresponding potential energy is
The bending line y(z) for H
0 is approximated as the solution of Differential Eq. 8ae for H = 0, i.e., Greenhill's equation. The bending line y(z) for B
0 is approximated as the solution of Differential Eq. 8ae for B = 0, i.e., zero gravity.
Table 3 gives values for G0, G*, H0, and H* as function of the tapering mode
.
1, the differences between G0 and G* and H0 and H* are small, such that the straight line from (G0, 0) to (0, H0) serves as a good approximation (Fig. 11). Values for ß
0 and/or
0 are not tabulated for this case. They can easily be computed using the Mathematica 4.0 program shown in Fig. 7.
|
|
During the oscillation each part of the stem as well as the additional load experiences a vertical displacement
= y/yT the balance T = V1 + V2 can be written as
As outlined above the evaluation of the numerical terms N1, N2, N3, and N4 requires the knowledge of the normalized bending line
(z). In general this is only available if three of the terms A, B, G, or H are zero, while the fourth is determined as a solution of Differential Eqs. 3ae or 8ae. The numerical terms N1, N2, N3, and N4 can be computed for the corresponding function
(z) being different for the four limiting cases A0, B0, G0, or H0. Table 4 shows the results of these computations for a given set of input values
, ß,
, zT, and z (tip). The values for A*, B*, G*, and H* allow to construct plots as in Fig. 9 to determine upper and lower estimates for the oscillation frequencies or for the stability against Euler buckling. Some special cases deserve mentioning. (a) G = 0; H = 0 describes the case of a stem with a top load but negligible mass of the stem itself as discussed above; (b) A = 0 and B = 0 describes the case of a stem with nonnegligible mass and no top load as discussed above; (c) B = 0; G = 0 describes the oscillation of a stem in the horizontal orientation with non-negligible mass and an additional mass attached (Spatz and Zebrowski, 2001
). For
= 0, ß = 0,
= 0, and zT = 0 and the oscillation frequency being dominated by the additional mass M the upper estimate reads
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
![]() | (13) |
= 0, it therefore describes the stability against Euler buckling for a stem with a nonnegligible self mass and an additional load attached (Spatz, 2000
|
2 (A0),
2 (B0),
2 (G0),
2 (H0). The upper estimate for the oscillation frequency is the minimum of these four values. The lower estimate can be computed as | RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
= 0.1415 and a nontapered rod of the same material were recorded. Differential Eq. 8ae was solved for ß = 0,
= 0, and G = 0 and the solution corrected for the reduction of the oscillation frequency due to a finite gravitational term according to Eq. 16. This results in a determination of the modulus of elasticity of 3.40 GPa for the tapered rod and 3.27 GPa for the nontapered rod compared to 3.32 GPa from independent three-point-bending experiments.
As an example of the applicability of the approach to the oscillation of plant stems the results of the analysis of video recordings of an Arundo donax stem are presented in Fig. 12. In this particular example the leaves were removed. The length of the stem is L = 4.33 m. The sample is part of a study of damping of oscillations performed on eight plants under various conditions (to be published elsewhere). The data are compatible with a damped harmonic oscillation, implying that the oscillation did not go beyond the linear elastic range of the material. The frequency of oscillation was
= 3.648 ± 0.004 sec1. The analysis of the amplitude as function of the height along the plant stem shows that it is a bending oscillation. It is not compatible with a pendulum with a hinge in the transition zone from stem to underground rhizome.
|
, ß, and
. With Arundo donax as a hollow stem, the outer and the inner radius have to be known to determine the cross-sectional area and the second moment of area. A double logarithmic plot of the second moment of area has a slope of 0.79. This yields an effective
= 0.20; 4
+ ß is determined from measurements of the bending stiffness as function of the position along the stem. A larger data set (Spatz et al., 1997
+ ß = 1. 71 ± 0.11. This leads to ß = 0.93, consistent with the shape of the bending line. The density was found independent of the position along the stem, i.e.,
= 0. The solution of Differential Eq. 8ae for these values and G = 0 gives H0 = 16.39. The correlation coefficient between the measured and the calculated amplitudes as function of the height above ground is R2 = 0.999.
Eq. 16 written in the form
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kerzenmacher T. B. Gardiner 1998 A mathematical model to describe the dynamic response of a spruce tree to the wind. Trees 12: 385-394[CrossRef]
Niklas K. J. 1989 Nodal septa and the rigidity of aerial shoots of Equisetum hyemale. American Journal of Botany 76: 521-531[CrossRef][ISI]
Niklas K. J. 1990 The mechanical significance of clasping leaf sheaths in grasses: evidence from two cultivars of Avena sativa. Annals of Botany 65: 505-512
Niklas K. J. 1991 Bending stiffness of cylindrical plant organs with a core-rind construction: evidence from Juncus effusus leaves. American Journal of Botany 78: 561-568[CrossRef][ISI]
Niklas K. J. 1992 Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Niklas K. J. 1997 Responses of hollow, septate stems to vibrations: biomechanical evidence that nodes can act mechanically as spring-like joints. Annals of Botany 80: 437-448
Niklas K. J. F. C. Moon 1988 Flexural stiffness and modulus of elasticity of flower stalks from Allium sativum as measured by multiple resonance frequency spectra. American Journal of Botany 75: 1517-1525[CrossRef][ISI]
Spatz H.-Ch. 2000 Greenhill's formula for the critical Euler buckling length revisited. In H.-Ch. Spatz and T. Speck [eds.], Plant biomechanics. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany
Spatz H.-Ch. H. Beismann F. Brüchert A. Emanns T. Speck 1997 Biomechanics of the giant reed Arundo donax. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 352: 1-10[CrossRef]
Spatz H.-Ch. J. Zebrowski In press Oscillation frequencies of plant stems with apical loads. Planta 214: 215-219
Speck O. H.-Ch. Spatz 2000 Oscillation and damping behaviour of the giant reed Arundo donax. In H.-Ch. Spatz and T. Speck [eds.], Plant biomechanics. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany
Timoshenko S. D. H. Young 1948 Advanced dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA
Vincent J. F. V. 1990 Structural biomaterials. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Young W. C. 1989 Roark's formulas for stress and strain. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA
Zebrowski J. 1991 The use of free vibrations to measure peduncle stiffness in Triticale. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 1207-1212
Zebrowski J. 1999 Dynamic behaviour of inflorescence bearing Triticale and Triticum stems. Planta 207: 410-417[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Sellier, Y. Brunet, and T. Fourcaud A numerical model of tree aerodynamic response to a turbulent airflow Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 279 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jaouen, T. Almeras, C. Coutand, and M. Fournier How to determine sapling buckling risk with only a few measurements Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1583 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Spatz, F. Bruchert, and J. Pfisterer Multiple resonance damping or how do trees escape dangerously large oscillations? Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1603 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Friedman and L. D. Harder Functional associations of floret and inflorescence traits among grass species Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2005; 92(11): 1862 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sellier and T. Fourcaud A mechanical analysis of the relationship between free oscillations of Pinus pinaster Ait. saplings and their aerial architecture J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2005; 56(416): 1563 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Speck and H.-C. Spatz Damped oscillations of the giant reed Arundo donax (Poaceae) Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 789 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Speck Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1253 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |