Am. J. Bot.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costello, A.
Right arrow Articles by Motley, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Costello, A.
Right arrow Articles by Motley, T. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Costello, A.
Right arrow Articles by Motley, T. J.
(American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:644-655.)
© 2004 Botanical Society of America, Inc.


Structure and Development

The development of the superior ovary in Tetraplasandra (Araliaceae)1

Annemarie Costello2,4 and Timothy J. Motley3

2Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003-6688 USA; 3The Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular Systematic Studies, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458-5126 USA

Received for publication May 23, 2003. Accepted for publication January 8, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Tetraplasandra is a small Hawaiian genus of seven species with remarkable diversity in ovary position, ranging from inferior to completely superior. Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa is the only member of the Araliaceae with a fully superior ovary. A comparative study of floral anatomy and development in superior and inferior ovary species of Tetraplasandra revealed that the superior ovary in T. gymnocarpa is unusual in that it develops within an epigynous ground plan. During the course of development, the ovary changes from inferior to secondarily superior primarily by an upward expansion of the ovary from the insertion point of the perianth and androecium to the ovary apex. The superior ovary of T. gymnocarpa, evident in late ontogeny, is a modified inferior ovary; thus it is not structurally homologous to a truly superior ovary. The adaptive significance of the switch from inferior to superior ovary is reexamined. A recent phylogeny of Tetraplasandra and the biogeography of the extant species provide evidence that the change in ovary position may be associated with a shift in pollination strategy that may have occurred as recently as 2.6 million years ago.

Key Words: Araliaceae • floral anatomy • floral ontogeny • Hawaiian Islands • inferior ovary • superior ovary • Tetraplasandra


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In general, ovary position is classified as superior or inferior. In a hypogynous flower, the ovary is superior and lies above the attachment of the stamens, petals, and sepals. In an epigynous flower, the ovary is inferior and lies below the attachment of the outer floral whorls. Epigyny has evolved from hypogyny many times independently and occurs in most major clades of angiosperms (Gustafsson and Albert, 1999 ). Reversals from epigyny to hypogyny are relatively rare, and in many large groups, the condition is fixed.

One exception is found in the Araliaceae in the Hawaiian endemic genus Tetraplasandra in which positions range from completely inferior (T. hawaiensis A. Gray, T. flynnii Lowry and Wood, T. oahuensis A. Gray, T. waialealae Rock, and T. waimeae Wawra) to partially superior [T. kavaiensis (H. Mann) Sherff] and fully superior [T. gymnocarpa (Hillebr.) Sherff]. Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa is the only member of the Araliaceae with a completely superior ovary (Eyde and Tseng, 1969 ). The nested position of Tetraplasandra within the Araliaceae (Plunkett et al., 1996 , 1997 ) and T. gymnocarpa within Tetraplasandra (Costello and Motley, 2001 ) phylogenetically corroborates Eyde and Tseng's (1969) hypothesis that hypogyny is secondarily derived in Tetraplasandra. This reversal contradicts a major trend in floral evolution toward epigyny (Coulter et al., 1910 ; Stebbins, 1974 ; Cronquist, 1981 ; Takhtajan, 1991 ; Gustafsson and Albert, 1999 ).

Although the derivation of epigyny historically has been controversial (Douglas, 1944 , 1957 ; Puri, 1951 , 1952 ; Kaplan, 1967 ), developmental and anatomical series in various plant families (e.g., Rosaceae—Bonne, 1928 ; Jackson, 1934 ; MacDaniels, 1940 ; Palser, 1961 ; Ericaceae—Eames, 1931 ; Onagraceae—Bonner, 1948 ), including the Araliaceae (Eames and MacDaniels, 1947 ; Singh, 1954 ), have shown that most epigynous flowers are appendicular in nature, implying that the inferior ovary originated through fusion with the bases of the outer floral organs. Nevertheless, in a small number of plant groups, the inferior ovary has been interpreted as receptacular (e.g., Calycanthaceae—Smith, 1928 ; Cactaceae—Leinfellner, 1941 ; Tiagi, 1955 ; Boke, 1964 ; Santalaceae—Smith and Smith, 1942 ), which implies that the ovary is embedded in the tissues of the floral receptacle.

Anatomical studies of floral vasculature support both types of development (Douglas, 1957 ; Kaplan, 1967 ). In receptacular epigynous flowers, the vascular bundles providing traces to the floral appendages run upward through the length of the ovary wall and then descend sharply to supply the ovule traces (Fig. 1A). In appendicular epigynous flowers, the vascular strands ascend from the pedicel to supply the ovule traces and diverge in an acropetal sequence to supply the stamens, petals, and sepals, just as they do in a typical hypogynous flower (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of longitudinal sections showing the vascular system of epigynous flowers indicated as (A) receptacular in origin and (B) appendicular in origin (from Kaplan, 1967 )

 
The adaptive significance of epigyny is still problematic. Grant (1950) considered epigyny to be largely a response to bird pollination. In epigynous flowers, the ovules are protected from foraging birds that eat superior floral parts. Stebbins (1974) proposed two hypotheses. One is that the inferior ovary provides developing ovules better protection against environmental stresses. Secondly, epigyny might enable quicker floral development and maturation of seeds.

Based on these hypotheses, is there evidence suggesting that the shift to hypogyny in Tetraplasandra was a response to natural selection? Eyde and Tseng (1969) suggested that the switch to hypogyny was probably not driven by selective pressure, but might simply reflect the relaxation of selection pressures on hypogynous mutants in an isolated island habitat. However, recent phylogenetic analyses of Tetraplasandra derived from morphological, ITS, and 5S-NTS sequence data (Costello and Motley, 2001 ; Costello, 2002 ) provide evidence that the change to hypogyny may have evolved over time in response to underlying selective forces. Within the T. gymnocarpa clade (see Fig. 2), T. flynnii has an inferior ovary, T. kavaiensis has a partially superior ovary, and T. gymnocarpa has a fully superior ovary. The range of ovary positions found in this clade suggests that hypogyny was a gradual transformation that evolved in a stepwise fashion. All three species have a substantial reduction in floral parts, most notably decreases in stamen number, and T. flynnii also shows a switch to andromonoecy. The shift to hypogyny, combined with a reduction in floral parts and a change in sex expression, provides evidence suggesting that the trend toward hypogyny in Tetraplasandra corresponds with changes in reproductive biology. Members of the sister clade to T. gymnocarpa (e.g., T. waimeae and T. waialealae) have a suite of morphological features that suggest a switch to ornithophily (Lowry, 1990 ). A shift from insect to bird pollination has occurred several times in the Hawaiian flora (e.g., Scaevola, Geranium, Hibiscadelphus, Kokia; Carlquist, 1980 ).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A simplified phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequence data with bootstrap value above 50% modified from Costello and Motley (2001) . Dashed branch indicates the addition of Tetraplasandra flynnii as the sister taxon to T. gymnocarpa and T. kavaiensis

 
The remarkable diversity in ovary position exhibited in Tetraplasandra provides an excellent system to study the evolution of ovary position within a phylogenetic context. In this study, we comparatively examine floral anatomy and development in superior and inferior ovary species of Tetraplasandra and use Kaplan's (1984) criteria of homology (cf. Remane, 1952 ) to determine whether the divergent ovary positions in Tetraplasandra are or are not homologous. Our goals are to elucidate the developmental transformations involved in shifting from an inferior to superior ovary, assess homology of ovary position in developing flowers, and reexamine the adaptive significance of hypogyny in Tetraplasandra.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Floral anatomy and ontogeny
Flower buds of Tetraplasandra were collected (Table 1) and preserved in the field in FAA (formaldehyde–ethanol– glacial acetic acid), dehydrated in an ethanol–toluene series (70%, 95%, 2 x 100% ethanol; 90%–10%, 70%–30%, 50%–50%, 30%–70%, 10%–90%, ethanol–toluene, 2 x 100% toluene), embedded in Paraplast Plus (Oxford, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), and sectioned serially at a thickness ranging from 10 to 15 µm with a Spencer 820 microtome (American Optical, Southbridge, Massachusetts, USA). Sections were stained with safranin and astra blue according to standard procedures (Johansen, 1940 ; Berlyn and Miksche, 1976 ). Permanent slides were made using Permount (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA) and photographed using a Nikon FX-35 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Collections of flower buds for anatomical1 and ontogenetic2 material for species of Tetraplasandra (HI = Hawaii)

 
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Flower buds were dissected, dehydrated to 100% ethanol, and then gradually infiltrated to 100% acetone. The samples were critical-point dried (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, New Jersey, USA) and mounted on stubs, coated with gold-palladium using a Hummer 1 sputter coater (Anatech, Springfield, Virginia, USA) and studied using a JEOL TSM-T300 scanning electron microscope (Jeol USA, Peabody, Massachusetts, USA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Floral morphology
The flowers of Tetraplasandra are actinomorphic, with the calyx forming an undulated cup that is fused to the ovary. Generally, there are 5–9 valvate petals (Fig. 3A). The flowers are bisexual (except for T. flynnii, which is andromonoecious; Lowry and Wood, 2000 ). The stamens alternate with the petals (e.g., T. gymnocarpa, T. kavaiensis, T. flynnii), are opposite and alternate with the petals (e.g., T. hawaiensis, T. waimeae, T. waialealae) and are equal to the number of petals (e.g., T. gymnocarpa, T. kavaiensis, T. flynnii), or are 2–8 times the number of petals (e.g., T. hawaiensis, T. waimeae, T. waialealae). The stamens are attached to the edge of a nectary disk that lies on top of the inferior ovary. The styles are fused, forming a stylopodium, which is confluent with the disk (see Fig. 3B). The stylopodium is greatly reduced in the superior ovary species T. gymnocarpa (Fig. 3F). In general, the ovary consists of 2–10 carpels, with an equal number of locules, each with a single pendulous ovule. Ovary positions of mature flowers vary among species of Tetraplasandra (Fig. 3C–F).



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Light micrographs of longitudinal sections of flower buds of Tetraplasandra illustrating the range of ovary position in the genus. (A) Floral diagram of the genus based on the type species, T. hawaiensis. (B) Schematic of longitudinal section of an epigynous flower. Note the stylopodium and apical placentation of the ovules. (C) T. hawaiensis (bar = 2 mm) and (D) T. flynnii have an inferior ovary (bar = 2 mm), (E) T. kavaiensis has a partially superior ovary (bar = 0.35 mm), and (F) T. gymnocarpa (bar = 0.35 mm) has a superior ovary. Abbreviations: Ca, calyx; Co, corolla; Ov, ovule; Nd, nectary disk; St, stamen(s); Sty, stylopodium. All light micrographs are brightfield and stained with safranin and astra blue

 
Vascular anatomy and the interpretation of the inferior ovary
The course of the principal vascular bundles in the ovary and the place of origin of the carpellary traces strongly indicate that the inferior ovary in Tetraplasanda is appendicular in nature (Fig. 4). The pattern of floral vasculature in Tetraplasandra is comparable to that shown in Fig. 1B depicting appendicular epigyny. According to the appendicular theory of the inferior ovary, the floral receptacle would be located at the base of the ovary where traces to the floral whorls have their origin from the pedicel stele.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Light micrographs of longitudinal sections of flower buds of Tetraplasandra oahuensis illustrating the appendicular nature of the inferior ovary. (A) The pedicel is the origin of the vascular traces to the ovary (bar = 0.40 mm). (B) Vascular traces supplying the stamens and perianth ascend along the ovary wall (bar = 0.40 mm). (C) Traces to the ovules run up from the base of the ovary (bar = 0.40 mm). (D) Higher magnification of the ovule traces (bar = 0.16 mm). Arrows indicate vasculature to the ovules and floral whorls

 
Development of the superior ovary in Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa
In the early bud stage (Fig. 5C, D), the receptacle is more or less flattened. The calyx encloses the other floral organs. The corolla is well developed, and the androecium and gynoecium are in early stages of development. The developing stamens are attached to the top of the ovary. As gynoecial development progresses, the receptacle becomes concave and more pronounced (Fig. 5E). At this stage, a pendulous ovule primordium is present in one of the two carpels. The top of the ovary expands upward toward the enclosing corolla. The ovary apex is now above the attachment of the stamens. By late floral development (Fig. 5B), dramatic changes occur in the position of the ovary. Continued expansion of the top of the ovary raises the ovary above the insertion point of the stamens and perianth. By anthesis (Fig. 5A), the ovary is fully superior.



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Floral development in Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa. (A) Flower at anthesis. Light micrographs of longitudinal sections of flower buds at (B) maturity (bar = 0.07 mm), (C) early stage (bar = 0.30 mm), (D) early stage at higher magnification (bar = 0.12 mm), (E) middle stage (bar = 0.86 mm), and (F) middle stage at higher magnification (bar = 0.35 mm). The arrows in (C, D, and E) indicate the receptacle at the base of the ovary

 
A comparison of floral development in T. gymnocarpa and in the inferior ovary species T. oahuensis reveals that early stages of floral development are quite similar. In both species, the stamens are attached to the top of the ovary (Fig. 6A, B). The major difference is in the depth of the inferior ovary. In T. gymnocarpa, the position of the ovary is shallow (Fig. 5C) compared to the deeper position shown in T. oahuensis (Fig. 7A). In mid- to late stages of floral development, differential growth of the ovaries is indicated. In T. gymnocarpa, the top of the ovary expands upward (Figs. 5E, 6C), and in T. oahuensis, the base of the ovary expands downward into the floral tube (Figs. 6D, 7B). By late floral development, the top of the ovary is expanded in T. gymnocarpa, and the stamens are attached at the base of the ovary (Fig. 6E). Conversely, in T. oahuensis, the base of the ovary is fully expanded, and the stamens are attached to the top of the ovary (Fig. 6F).



View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Scanning electron micrographs of flower buds of Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa (left) and T. oahuensis (right) at different developmental stages illustrating differential growth in the superior and inferior ovaries. Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa at (A) early bud stage (bar = 100 µm), (C) middle bud stage (bar = 100 µm), and (E) late bud stage (bar = 1 mm). Tetraplasandra oahuensis at (B) early bud stage (bar = 100 µm), (D) middle bud stage (bar = 0.5 mm), and (F) late bud stage (bar = 1 mm). The perianth and some stamens were dissected from the buds for a better view of the top of the ovary.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Floral development in Tetraplasandra oahuensis. Light micrographs of longitudinal sections of flower buds at (A) early stage (bar = 0. 40 mm) and (B) late stage development (bar = 0. 40 mm)

 
A developmental shift from epigyny to hypogyny
This study indicates that T. gymnocarpa has an atypical superior ovary that is revealed late in ontogeny. Further evidence supporting the atypical nature is the variation in floral bud morphology during the course of development. A hypogynous flower usually has a convex floral bud throughout development (Boke, 1964 , 1966 ; Kaplan, 1967 ; Fig. 1 in Kuzoff et al., 2001 ). In contrast, in T. gymnocarpa the floral bud becomes increasingly concave (Fig. 5E) as development progresses, comparable to an epigynous flower (see Fig. 1 in Kuzoff et al., 2001 ).

This pattern of gynoecial development can be explained based on the "principle of variable proportions" (cf. Troll, 1948 , 1949 ; Leins, 1972 ; Leins and Erbar, 1985 ; Igersheim et al., 1994 ). The variability of proportions is interpreted by using a series of three lines (a, b, and c) and by measuring the changes in their length, angle, and distance to one another during ovary development (Igersheim et al., 1994 ). Line "a" is perpendicular to the median longitudinal axis of the ovary, running from the insertion point of the perianth and androecium to the median longitudinal axis. Line "b" is also perpendicular, running from the base of the ovary to the median longitudinal axis (cf. Leins, 1972 ). Line "c" connects line "a" (insertion point) and line "b" (ovary base). As Igersheim et al. (1994) point out, in a truly superior ovary, line "b" would be above line "a," and line "c" would obliquely approach the longitudinal axis toward the distal end (i.e., farthest from the insertion point of the perianth and androecium). The opposite is expected in an inferior ovary; line "a" would be above line "b," and line "c" would obliquely approach the longitudinal axis toward the proximal end. If the floral axis is flat, lines "a," "b," and "c" would be superimposed.

By applying this paradigm to T. gymnocarpa, the shift from an inferior to a superior ovary seems to be a result of differential growth of the ovary causing expansion of the top of the ovary. In a typical inferior ovary, such as in T. oahuensis, there is a deep floral cup. Consequently, during development, the distance between lines "a" and "b" becomes greater and greater (Fig. 8A, B) as the base of the ovary expands. Alternatively in T. gymnocarpa, the floral cup is relatively shallow during early carpel development (Fig. 9A). As development progresses (Fig. 9B), the distance between lines "a" and "b" barely increases. By late development, the vertical distance between lines "a" and "b" decreases dramatically (Fig. 9C). Apical expansion of the ovary as well as extension of the floral axis (i.e., below the ovary base) causes the ovary to become superior. This is a very similar pattern to what has been shown in Gaertnera [e.g., G. macrostipulata Baker, G. oblanceolata King and Gamble var. diversifolia (Ridl) van Beusekom, G. vaginans (DC.) Merr. subsp. junghuhniana (Miq.) van Beusekom, G. vaginans (DC.) Merr. subsp. vaginans] in which the superior ovary is also a consequence of the expansion of the ovary apex (Igersheim et al., 1994 ).



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Tetraplasandra oahuensis at early and late stages of development illustrating the "principle of variable proportions." Light micrographs of longitudinal sections of buds at (A) early stage (bar = 0.40 mm) and (B) late stage floral development (bar = 0.40 mm). Line "a" extends from the insertion point of the perianth and androecium to the median longitudinal axis; line "b" extends from the base of the ovary to the median longitudinal axis; line "c" connects the insertion point (line "a") and the ovary base (line "b")

 


View larger version (188K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa at early to late stages of development illustrating the "principle of variable proportions." Light micrographs of longitudinal sections of buds at (A) early stage (bar = 0.30 mm), (B) middle stage (bar = 0.30 mm), and (C) late stage floral development (bar = 0.38 mm). See Fig. 8 for explanation of the lines

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Endress (1994) characterizes three phases of floral organ development: (1) the floral organs are initiated, (2) the organs attain their shapes by differential growth, and (3) they differentiate their specific tissues. Regardless of the "nature" of the inferior ovary, phase two indicates that the inferior position results from pronounced dilation of the ovary base but little dilation of the ovary apex (Leins, 1972 ). Several ontogenetic studies of different epigynous groups have confirmed this observation (e.g., in the Campanulaceae [Kaplan, 1967 ], Apiaceae [Leins and Erbar, 1985 ], and Araliaceae [Erbar and Leins, 1988 ]).

Based on the evidence reported here for Tetraplasandra, the shift from an inferior to a superior position results mostly from pronounced dilation of the ovary apex but little dilation of the ovary base. Developmental studies in the Haemodoraceae (Simpson, 1998 ), Rubiaceae (Igersheim et al., 1994 ), and Saxifragaceae (Kuzoff et al., 2001 ) corroborate that the switch from an inferior to a superior position can be explained by differential growth. The superior ovary in Gaertnera (Rubiaceae) and the nearly superior ovary found in species of Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae) arises from differential growth from the insertion point of the perianth and androecium to the apex of the ovary. In Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae), the superior ovary is derived primarily from extension of the central axis of the receptacle (Simpson, 1998 ). In Tetraplasandra, as well as Wachendorfia and Gaertnera, the ontogeny of the superior ovary reflects phylogeny. All three genera are nested well within epigynous families, and floral development indicates that the superior ovary found in these genera is really a modified inferior ovary.

Homology of ovary position
Remane (1952) considers structures homologous if they fulfill one or more of three criteria: (1) equivalent positions within the general ground plan, (2) equivalent special quality, and (3) connection of differing structures by intermediates. According to Remane's criteria of homology, the superior ovary of T. gymnocarpa is homologous to an inferior ovary. The ovary of T. gymnocarpa arises inferior, but subsequently becomes displaced (i.e., superior) by differential growth. Kaplan (1984) points out that when a character state changes during the ontogeny of the structure, developmental stages can function as intermediates linking the two divergent character states. According to Kaplan, this criterion is the most useful in determining homologies. In T. gymnocarpa, the ovary is inferior initially, partially superior (i.e., intermediate) at middle stages of floral development (Fig. 4E), and fully superior by anthesis. Structural intermediates can also be found between different species of closely related taxa (Kaplan, 1984 ). As mentioned earlier, Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa shares a clade with the hemi-epigynous species T. kavaiensis and the epigynous species T. flynnii (see Fig. 2). Based on the intermediate criterion of homology, the partially superior ovary of T. kavaiensis may represent a phylogenetic intermediate connecting the inferior ovary (T. flynnii) and the fully superior ovary (T. gymnocarpa).

The developmental pathway of least resistance
Stebbins (1950) proposed that most of the trends of plant evolution are best expressed by the fourth and fifth of Ganong's (1901) "cardinal principles of morphology." Ganong's (1901 , p. 428) "principle of indeterminate anatomical plasticity" states that in all anatomical characters (including position), plant organs "... are not limited by anything in their morphological nature, but under proper influence may be led to wax and wane indefinitely in any of these respects" (p. 429). His principle of "metamorphosis along the lines of least resistance" further states that when a change in environmental conditions necessitates the performance of a new function, it will be assumed by that part which is "... most available for that purpose, regardless of its morphological nature, either because that part already has a structure most nearly answering the demands of the new function, or because it happens to be set free from its former function by change of habit, or for some other non- morphological reason" (p. 429).

Although Stebbins (1974) advocated Ganong's "principle of indeterminate anatomical plasticity," he pointed out that the developmental pattern of an epigynous flower is so complex that reversion to the hypogynous condition is difficult to achieve. He argued that adaptive modifications along the pathway of least resistance can give rise to a number of modifications of the epigynous pattern, rather than its abandonment. For example, epigynous flowers can give rise to fruit structures that are functionally analogous but not homologous to various kinds of fruits derived from hypogynous flowers (e.g., dehiscent capsules, many-seeded berries, stone fruits).

Evidence from this study and other developmental studies in epigynous groups (e.g., Igersheim et al., 1994 ; Simpson, 1998 ) validate Ganong's point of view regarding anatomical plasticity and indicate that the inferior ovary is a labile character state that can be modified along a developmental pathway of least resistance, well before fruit development. The superior ovary in Tetraplasandra, Wachendorfia, and Gaertnera is an inferior ovary that has been modified developmentally simply by differential growth. Tetraplasandra and Gaertnera are endemic to island environments, which can foster the development of unique adaptations through founder effects and genetic drift (Mayr, 1954 , 1965 ; Carson, 1981 ). Gaertnera is endemic to Madagascar, Borneo, and Sri Lanka. Tetraplasandra is endemic to the Hawaiian Islands where another putative secondarily hypogynous species, Hillebrandia sandwicensis in the Begoniaceae (Charpentier et al., 1989 ), occurs.

Adaptive significance of shifting ovary position
Eyde and Tseng (1969) suggested that the switch to hypogyny was probably not a response to selection pressures, but that selection pressures against hypogynous mutants might have been relaxed on the Hawaiian Islands. Random mutations could be fixed extremely rapidly in small island populations as a result of founder effects and drift (Mayr, 1954 ; Carson, 1981 ). Carlquist (1969) also suggested that the switch to hypogyny was probably quick, because intermediate stages would be expected if the transition had developed over a long period of time. The partial hypogyny in T. kavaiensis (Fig. 2) may represent an intermediate state. In that case, the switch to hypogyny may have occurred over time as a result of natural selection.

Based on the distribution of the extant species and the geological age of the Hawaiian Islands, the possibility that the change occurred quite rapidly, perhaps as the result of a single mutation cannot be ruled out. Among the members of the T. gymnocarpa clade, T. flynnii is a recently discovered species of only three known individuals endemic to Kauai (Lowry and Wood, 2000 ), the oldest of the Hawaiian Islands (5.1 million years [my]; Carson and Clague, 1995 ). Tetraplasanda kavaiensis is common on Kauai and apparently rarer on the younger islands (Lowry, 1990 ). Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa is an extremely rare species restricted to Oahu (Lowry, 1990 ), an island several million years younger (3.7 my) than Kauai. Given the phylogenetic relationships and biogegraphy of the modern species of Tetraplasandra as well as the age of the Hawaiian Islands, the superior ovary evolved at least 2.6 my ago. This change is a fairly recent evolutionary event and is found in a single population along the crest of the Koolau Mountain Range.

Additionally, Eyde and Tseng (1969) suggested that selection for increased outcrossing, an important evolutionary trend on oceanic islands (Carlquist, 1966 , 1980 ), may have played a role in the secondary derivation of the superior ovary. In buds of herbarium specimens of T. gymnocarpa, they observed that the stigma is separated from the anthers, and at anthesis the stigma remains above the anthers. This arrangement seems well adapted for inhibiting self-pollination. In the inferior ovary species of Tetraplasandra, the stigma is located below the anthers.

Alternatively, increasing evidence supports a shift in pollination strategy. Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa, T. kavaiensis, and T. flynnii show decreases in the number of ovary cells (2– 5) and a substantial reduction in the number of stamens (equal to the number of petals). The reduction in floral parts is probably not associated with developmental constraints due to the changes in ovary position, because T. flynnii has both a reduction in the number of floral parts and an inferior ovary. Interestingly, T. flynnii is the only species in the genus that is andromonoecious (Lowry and Wood, 2000 ). Although the adaptive significance of andromonoecy in T. flynnii is unknown, changes in sexual system are usually associated with changes in pollination biology (Bawa and Beach, 1981 ). It is plausible that the derived floral character states found in members of the T. gymnocarpa clade reflect a response to changes in pollination or dispersal opportunities.

The Kauai endemics, T. waialealae and T. waimeae, have a suite of specialized floral character states that suggest the development of ornithophily (Lowry, 1990 ). The ovary is inferior and the large fuchsia flowers are clustered in dense compound umbellules, producing abundant quantities of nectar. As mentioned earlier, the epigynous species of the Tetraplasandra group have a nectary disk surmounting the inferior ovary. Both T. waimeae and T. waialealae have prominent nectary disks. In longitudinal sections of flowers, the nectary disk is indicated by a darkened staining pattern at the top of the ovary (Fig. 3C, D). In longitudinal sections of flowers of T. gymnocarpa, there is no such staining pattern at the top or base of the ovary indicating a nectary disk (Fig. 3F). The absence or a reduction of the nectary disk may be associated with the transformations involved in the development of the superior ovary. A loss or reduction in the nectary disk provides further evidence supporting the hypothesis that the switch to hypogyny corresponds with changes in reproductive ecology.

Based on differences in floral morphology and their sister- clade relationship, the T. gymnocarpa and the T. waimeaeT. waialealae clades may represent lineages that diverged in response to different pollination opportunities. Bird flowers produce relatively large amounts of nectar consisting of almost entirely of hexose sugars, with very little or no sucrose (Baker and Baker, 1983 ). Qualitative differences in floral nectar would be expected among members of the T. gymnocarpa and T. waimeaeT. waialealae clades if there are differences in reproductive biology. Our future research will focus on the reproductive ecology of Tetraplasandra to test whether the differences in floral morphology reflect differences in pollination biology.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Analyses of floral anatomy, ontogeny, and phylogeny indicate that the superior ovary in T. gymnocarpa develops within an epigynous groundplan, but as a result of the upward expansion of the ovary, the ovary is secondarily superior. Therefore, the superior ovary of T. gymnocarpa is a modified inferior ovary and is not homologous to a truly superior ovary. We hypothesize that the switch to superiority in Tetraplasandra is a result of changes in pollination strategy. Future research will focus on the reproductive biology of Tetraplasandra to establish whether the differences in floral morphology are a response to differences in pollinators and/or dispersers. Although the change from epigyny to hypogyny is relatively rare, a number of examples document this change in different plant families. Interestingly, several of these species occur in insular habitats. While the change from inferior to partially superior and superior ovary in Tetraplasandra appears to be a transition that occurred over a long period of time, the dramatic change in floral morphology in T. gymnocarpa may be the genetic consequence of a single mutation event that occurred at least 2.6 my ago in the Koolau Mountain range on Oahu.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The authors thank Dennis W. Stevenson, Lisa Campbell, and Erica Kipp for valuable discussions concerning lab techniques and anatomy and for facilitating research on the SEM; Hank Oppenheimer and Kenneth Wood for providing floral material; Hawaii Department of Land and Material Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife; Lisa Campbell and Paula Mikkelsen for their assistance in photomicroscopy; Gregory Plunkett and Douglas Daly for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. A. C. is grateful to Joel Cracraft and George Barrowclough at the American Museum of Natural History for a Cullman post-doctoral fellowship, which facilitated the writing of this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the American Society of Plant Taxonomists, the International Association of Plant Taxonomists, and The Explorers Club for research awards to A. C. Back

4 E-mail: acostello{at}ross.org Back


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Baker H. G. I. Baker 1983 Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In C. E. Jones and R. J. Little [eds.], Handbook of experimental pollination biology, 117–141. Scientific and Academic Editions, New York, New York, USA

Bawa K. S. J. H. Beach 1981 Evolution of sexual systems in plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 254-274[CrossRef][ISI]

Berlyn G. P. J. K. P. Miksche 1976 Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA

Boke N. H. 1964 The cactus gynoecium: a new interpretation. American Journal of Botany 51: 598-610[CrossRef][ISI]

Boke N. H. 1966 Ontogeny and structure of the flower and fruit of Pereskia aculeata. American Journal of Botany 53: 534-542[CrossRef][ISI]

Bonne G. 1928 Recherches sur le pédicelle et la fleur des Rosacées. Jouve, Paris, France.

Bonner C. E. B. 1948 The floral vascular supply in Epilobium and related genera. Candollea 11: 277-303

Carlquist S. 1966 The biota of long-distance dispersal. III. Loss of dispersibility in the Hawaiian flora. Brittonia 18: 310-335[CrossRef][ISI]

Carlquist S. 1969 Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology 19: 332-362[ISI]

Carlquist S. 1980 Hawaii: a natural history, 2nd ed. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawai, Hawaii, USA

Carson H. L. 1981 Microevolution in insular ecosystems. In D. Mueller- Dombois, K. W. Bridges, and H. L. Carson [eds.], Island ecosystems: biological organization in selected Hawaiian communities, 471–482. Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, USA

Carson H. L. D. A. Clague 1995 Geology and biogeography of the Hawaiian Islands. In W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk [eds.], Hawaiian biogeography: evolution on a hotspot archipelago, 14–29. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA

Charpentier A. L. Brouillet D. Barabé 1989 Organogénèse de la fleur pistilée du Begonia dregei et de l'Hillebrandia sandwicensis (Begoniaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 3625-3639[ISI]

Costello A. 2002 Molecular and morphological systematics of the Tetraplasandra group (Araliaceae) and the development of the superior ovary in Tetraplasandra. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, New York, New York, USA

Costello A. T. J. Motley 2001 Molecular systematics of Tetraplasandra, Munroidendron and Reynoldsia sandwicensis (Araliaceae) and the evolution of superior ovaries in Tetraplasandra. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 58: 229-242[CrossRef]

Coulter J. M. C. R. Barnes H. C. Cowles 1910 A textbook of botany for colleges and universities, vol. 1. American Book Company, New York, New York, USA

Cronquist A. 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Douglas G. E. 1944 The inferior ovary. Botanical Review 10: 125-186

Douglas G. E. 1957 The inferior ovary, II. Botanical Review 23: 1-41[ISI]

Eames A. J. 1931 The vascular anatomy of the flower with refutation of the theory of carpel polymorphism. American Journal of Botany 18: 147-188[CrossRef][ISI]

Eames A. J. L. H. MacDaniels 1947 An introduction to plant anatomy, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA

Endress P. K. 1994 Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA

Erbar C. P. Leins 1988 Blütenentwicklungsgeschichtliche studien an Aralia und Hedera (Araliaceae). Flora 180: 391-406[ISI]

Eyde R. H. C. C. Tseng 1969 Flower of Tetraplasandra gymnocarpa. Hypogyny with epigynous ancestry. Science 166: 506-508[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ganong W. F. 1901 The cardinal principles of morphology. Botanical Gazette 31: 426-434[CrossRef]

Grant V. 1950 The protection of the ovules in flowering plants. Evolution 4: 179-201[CrossRef][ISI]

Gustafsson M. H. G. V. A. Albert 1999 Inferior ovaries and angiosperm diversification. In P. M. Hollingsworth, R. M. Bateman, and R. J. Gornall [eds.], Molecular systematics and plant evolution. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series 57. Taylor and Francis, New York, New York, USA

Igersheim A. C. Puff P. Leins C. Erbar 1994 Gynoecial development of Gaertnera Lam. and of presumably allied taxa of the Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae): secondarily "superior" vs. inferior ovaries. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 116: 401-414

Jackson G. 1934 The morphology of the flowers of Rosa and certain closely related genera. American Journal of Botany 21: 453-466[CrossRef][ISI]

Johansen D. A. 1940 Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA

Kaplan D. R. 1967 Floral morphology, organogenesis and interpretation of the inferior ovary in Downingia bacigalupii. American Journal of Botany 54: 1274-1290[CrossRef][ISI]

Kaplan D. R. 1984 The concept of homology and its central role in the elucidation of plant systematic relationships. In T. Duncan and T. F. Stuessy [eds.], Cladistics: perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history, 51–70. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Kuzoff R. K. L. Hufford D. E. Soltis 2001 Structural homology and developmental transformations associated with ovary diversification in Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 196-205[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leinfellner W. 1941 Über den unterständigen fruchtknoten und einige bemerkungen über den bauplan des verwachsenblättrigen gynoeceums an sich. Botanisches Archiv: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Botanik 42: 1-43

Leins P. 1972 Das Karpell im ober- und unterständigen Gynoeceum. Berichte der Deutschen Botanische Gesellschaft 85: 291-294

Leins P. C. Erbar 1985 Zur frühen Entwicklungsgeschichte des Apiaceen-Gynoeceums. Ein Beitrag zur Entmythologisierung des unterständigen Fruchtknotens. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik Pflanzengeschicte und Pflanzengeographie 106: 53-50

Lowry P. P. II. 1990 Treatment of the Hawaiian Araliaceae. In W. L. Wagner, D. R. Herbst, and S. H. Sohmer [eds.], Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii, 224–237. University of Hawaii Press, Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Lowry P. P. II K. R. Wood 2000 A new, threatened species of Tetraplasandra (Araliaceae) from Kauai, Hawaiian Islands, and notes on its conservation status. Novon 10: 40-44[CrossRef][ISI]

MacDaniels L. H. 1940 The morphology of the apple and other pome fruits. Memoir (Cornell University, Agriculture Experimental Station, Geneva, New York, USA) 230: 1–32

Mayr E. 1954 Change of genetic environment and evolution. In J. Huxley, A. C. Hardy, and E. B. Ford [eds.], Evolution as a process, 157–180. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA

Mayr E. 1965 Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Palser B. F. 1961 Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales V. Organography and vascular anatomy in several United States species of the Vacciniaceae. Botanical Gazette 123: 79-111[CrossRef]

Plunkett G. M. D. E. Soltis P. S. Soltis 1996 Higher level relationships of Apiales (Apiaceae and Araliaceae) based on phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 499-515[CrossRef][ISI]

Plunkett G. M. D. E. Soltis P. S. Soltis 1997 Clarification of the relationship between Apiaceae and Araliaceae based on matK and rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 84: 565-580[Abstract]

Puri V. 1951 The role of floral anatomy in the solution of morphological problems. Botanical Review 17: 471-553

Puri V. 1952 Floral anatomy and inferior ovary. Phytomorphology 2: 122-129[ISI]

Remane A. 1952 Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, Germany

Simpson M. G. 1998 Reversal in ovary position from inferior to superior in the Haemodoraceae: evidence from floral ontogeny. International Journal of Plant Science 159: 466-479[CrossRef][ISI]

Singh D. 1954 Floral morphology and embryology of Hedera nepalensis K. Koch. Agra University. Journal of Research Science 3: 289-299

Smith F. H. E. C. Smith 1942 Anatomy of the inferior ovary of Darbya. American Journal of Botany 29: 464-471[CrossRef][ISI]

Smith G. H. 1928 Vascular anatomy of ranalian flowers. II. Botanical Gazette 85: 152-177[CrossRef]

Stebbins G. L. 1950 Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Stebbins G. L. 1974 Flowering plants, evolution above the species level. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Takhtajan A. 1991 Evolutionary trends in flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA

Tiagi Y. D. 1955 Studies in floral morphology. II. Vascular anatomy of the flower in certain species of the Cactaceae. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 34: 408-428

Troll W. 1948 Allgemeine botanik. Ein lehrbuch auf vergleichend-biologischer grundlage, 3. verb. und verm. Aufl. F. Enke, Stuttgart, Germany

Troll W. 1949 Die stiel-spreiten-relation als ausdruck des prinzips der variable proportionen. Naturwissenschaften 36: 333-338[CrossRef][ISI]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. Groeninckx, A. Vrijdaghs, S. Huysmans, E. Smets, and S. Dessein
Floral Ontogeny of the Afro-Madagascan Genus Mitrasacmopsis with Comments on the Development of Superior Ovaries in Rubiaceae
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2007; 100(1): 41 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costello, A.
Right arrow Articles by Motley, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Costello, A.
Right arrow Articles by Motley, T. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Costello, A.
Right arrow Articles by Motley, T. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS